Metabolomic studies allow a deeper understanding of the processes of a given ecological community than nucleic acid–based surveys alone. In the case of the gut microbiota, a metabolic profile of, for example, a fecal sample provides details about the function and interactions within the distal region of the gastrointestinal tract, and such a profile can be generated in a number of different ways. This unit elaborates on the use of 1D1H NMR spectroscopy as a commonly used method to characterize small‐molecule metabolites of the fecal metabonome (meta‐metabolome). We describe a set of protocols for the preparation of fecal water extraction, storage, scanning, measurement of pH, and spectral processing and analysis. We also compare the effects of various sample storage conditions for processed and unprocessed samples to provide a framework for comprehensive analysis of small molecules from stool‐derived samples. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC
Glycosylated proteins, namely glycoproteins and proteoglycans (collectively called glycoconjugates), are indispensable in a variety of biological processes. The functions of many glycoconjugates are regulated by their interactions with another group of proteins known as lectins. In order to understand the biological functions of lectins and their glycosylated binding partners, one must obtain these proteins in pure form. The conventional protein purification methods often require long times, elaborate infrastructure, costly reagents, and large sample volumes. To minimize some of these problems, we recently developed and validated a new method termed capture and release (CaRe). This method is time‐saving, precise, inexpensive, and it needs a relatively small sample volume. In this approach, targets (lectins and glycoproteins) are captured in solution by multivalent ligands called target capturing agents (TCAs). The captured targets are then released and separated from their TCAs to obtain purified targets. Application of the CaRe method could play an important role in discovering new lectins and glycoconjugates. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
- PAR ID:
- 10238502
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Current Protocols in Protein Science
- Volume:
- 101
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 1934-3655
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Abstract Basic Protocol 1 : Extracting fecal water from crude fecal samplesAlternate Protocol 1 : Extracting fecal water from small crude fecal samplesBasic Protocol 2 : Acquiring NMR spectra of metabolite samplesAlternate Protocol 2 : Acquiring NMR spectra of metabolite samples using Bruker spectrometer running TopSpin 3.xAlternate Protocol 3 : Acquiring NMR spectra of metabolite samples by semiautomated processBasic Protocol 3 : Measuring sample pHSupport Protocol 1 : Cleaning NMR tubesBasic Protocol 4 : Processing raw spectra dataBasic Protocol 5 : Profiling spectraSupport Protocol 2 : Spectral profiling of sugars and other complex metabolites -
Abstract Protein S‐acylation, predominately in the form of palmitoylation, is a reversible lipid post‐translational modification on cysteines that plays important roles in protein localization, trafficking, activity, and complex assembly. The functions and regulatory mechanisms of S‐acylation have been extensively studied in mammals owing to remarkable development of high‐resolution proteomics and the discovery of the S‐acylation‐related enzymes. However, the advancement of S‐acylation studies in plants lags behind that in mammals, mainly due to the lack of knowledge about proteins responsible for this process, such as protein acyltransferases and their substrates. In this article, a set of systematic protocols to study global S‐acylation in
Arabidopsis seedlings is described. The procedures are presented in detail, including preparation ofArabidopsis seedlings, enrichment of plasma membrane (PM) proteins, ensuing enrichment of S‐acylated proteins/peptides based on the acyl‐biotin exchange method, and large‐scale identification of S‐acylated proteins/peptides via mass spectrometry. This approach enables researchers to study S‐acylation of PM proteins in plants in a systematic and straightforward way. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.Basic Protocol 1 : Preparation ofArabidopsis seedling materialsBasic Protocol 2 : Isolation and enrichment of plasma membrane proteinsSupport Protocol 1 : Determination of protein concentration using BCA assayBasic Protocol 3 : Enrichment of S‐acylated proteins by acyl‐biotin exchange methodSupport Protocol 2 : Protein precipitation by methanol/chloroform methodBasic Protocol 4 : Trypsin digestion and proteomic analysisAlternate Protocol : Pre‐resin digestion and peptide‐level enrichment -
Abstract Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a Gram‐negative, halophilic bacterium and opportunistic pathogen of humans and shrimp. Investigating the mechanisms ofV. parahaemolyticus infection and the multifarious virulence factors it employs requires procedures for bacterial culture, genetic manipulation, and analysis of virulence phenotypes. Detailed protocols for growth assessment, generation of mutants, and phenotype assessment are included in this article. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.Basic Protocol 1 : Assessment of growth ofV. parahaemolyticus Alternate Protocol 1 : Assessment of growth ofV. parahaemolyticus using a plate readerBasic Protocol 2 : Swimming/swarming motility assayBasic Protocol 3 : Genetic manipulationAlternate Protocol 2 : Natural transformationBasic Protocol 4 : Secretion assay and sample preparation for mass spectrometry analysisBasic Protocol 5 : Invasion assay (gentamicin protection assay)Basic Protocol 6 : Immunofluorescence detection of intracellularV. parahaemolyticus Basic Protocol 7 : Cytotoxicity assay for T3SS2 -
Abstract The reversible oxidation of protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) impairs their ability to dephosphorylate substrates in vivo. This transient inactivation of PTPs occurs as their conserved catalytic cysteine residue reacts with cellular oxidants thereby abolishing the ability of this reactive cysteine to attack the phosphate of the target substrate. Hence, in vivo, the inhibition of specific PTPs in response to regulated and localized rises in cellular oxidants enables phospho‐dependent signaling. We present assays that measure the endogenous activity of specific PTPs that become transiently inactivated in cells exposed to growth factors. Here, we describe the methods and highlight the pitfalls to avoid post‐lysis oxidation of PTPs in order to assess the inactivation and the reactivation of PTPs targeted by cellular oxidants in signal transduction. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Basic Protocol 1 : Cell transfection (optional)Support Protocol : Preparation of degassed lysis buffersBasic Protocol 2 : Cellular extraction in anaerobic conditionsBasic Protocol 3 : Enrichment and activity assay of specific PTPsAlternate Protocol : Measurement of active PTPs via direct cysteinyl labeling -
Abstract Fungi infect over a billion people worldwide and contribute substantially to human morbidity and mortality despite all available therapies. New antifungal drugs are urgently needed. Decades of study have revealed numerous protein targets of potential therapeutic interest for which potent, fungal‐selective ligands remain to be discovered and developed. To measure the binding of diverse small molecule ligands to their larger protein targets, fluorescence polarization (FP) can provide a robust, inexpensive approach. The protocols in this article provide detailed guidance for developing FP‐based assays capable of measuring binding affinity in whole cell lysates without the need for purification of the target protein. Applications include screening of libraries to identify novel ligands and the definition of structure‐activity relationships to aid development of compounds with improved target affinity and fungal selectivity. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
This article was corrected on 18 July 2022. See the end of the full text for details.
Basic Protocol 1 : Use of saturation binding curves to optimize tracer and lysate protein concentrationsBasic Protocol 2 : Establishment of competition binding experimentsSupport Protocol 1 : Preparation of fungal cell lysatesSupport Protocol 2 : Preparation of human HepG2 cell lysate