skip to main content


Title: Paraoxonase‐1 (PON1) Status Analysis Using Non‐Organophosphate Substrates
Abstract

Human paraoxonase‐1 (PON1) is a high‐density lipoprotein‐associated enzyme with antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and antiapoptotic roles. The ability of PON1 to hydrolyze specific organophosphate (OP) compounds and prevent accumulation of oxidized lipids in lipoproteins has prompted a large number of studies investigating PON1's role in modulating toxicity and disease. Most of these studies, however, have only focused onPON1single nucleotide polymorphism analyses and have ignored PON1 activity levels, arguably the most important parameter in determining protection against exposure and disease. We developed a two‐substrate activity assay termed “PON1 status” that reveals both the functionalPON1192genotype and plasma PON1 activity levels. While our previous studies with PON1 status demonstrated that bothPON1192functional genotype and enzymatic activity levels obtained exclusively by determining PON1 status are required for a proper evaluation of PON1's role in modulating OP exposures and risk of disease, the original PON1 status assay requires the use of highly toxic OP metabolites. As many laboratories are not prepared to handle such toxic compounds and the associated waste generated, determination of PON1 status has been limited to rather few studies. Here, we describe a PON1 status protocol that uses non‐OP substrates with a resolution equivalent to that of the original PON1 status approach. We have also included useful suggestions to ensure the assays can easily be carried out in any laboratory. The protocols described here will enable a proper examination of the risk of exposure or susceptibility to disease in PON1 epidemiological studies without the need to handle highly toxic substrates. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

This article was corrected on 18 July 2022. See the end of the full text for details.

Basic Protocol: Determining PON1 status using non‐organophosphate substrates

Support Protocol 1: Experimental pathlength determination

Support Protocol 2:PON1DNA genotyping for the Q192R (rs662) polymorphism

 
more » « less
NSF-PAR ID:
10238665
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Current Protocols
Volume:
1
Issue:
1
ISSN:
2691-1299
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    Protein S‐acylation, predominately in the form of palmitoylation, is a reversible lipid post‐translational modification on cysteines that plays important roles in protein localization, trafficking, activity, and complex assembly. The functions and regulatory mechanisms of S‐acylation have been extensively studied in mammals owing to remarkable development of high‐resolution proteomics and the discovery of the S‐acylation‐related enzymes. However, the advancement of S‐acylation studies in plants lags behind that in mammals, mainly due to the lack of knowledge about proteins responsible for this process, such as protein acyltransferases and their substrates. In this article, a set of systematic protocols to study global S‐acylation inArabidopsisseedlings is described. The procedures are presented in detail, including preparation ofArabidopsisseedlings, enrichment of plasma membrane (PM) proteins, ensuing enrichment of S‐acylated proteins/peptides based on the acyl‐biotin exchange method, and large‐scale identification of S‐acylated proteins/peptides via mass spectrometry. This approach enables researchers to study S‐acylation of PM proteins in plants in a systematic and straightforward way. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

    Basic Protocol 1: Preparation ofArabidopsisseedling materials

    Basic Protocol 2: Isolation and enrichment of plasma membrane proteins

    Support Protocol 1: Determination of protein concentration using BCA assay

    Basic Protocol 3: Enrichment of S‐acylated proteins by acyl‐biotin exchange method

    Support Protocol 2: Protein precipitation by methanol/chloroform method

    Basic Protocol 4: Trypsin digestion and proteomic analysis

    Alternate Protocol: Pre‐resin digestion and peptide‐level enrichment

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Organophosphate (OP) and carbamate (CM) insecticides are widely used in the United States and share the same mode of toxic action. Both classes are frequently documented in aquatic ecosystems, sometimes at levels that exceed aquatic life benchmarks. We previously identified a population of the nontarget amphipod,Hyalella azteca, thriving in an agricultural creek with high sediment levels of the OP chlorpyrifos, suggesting the population may have acquired genetic resistance to the pesticide. In the present study, we surveyed 17 populations ofH. aztecain California to screen for phenotypic resistance to chlorpyrifos as well as genetic signatures of resistance in the acetylcholinesterase (ace‐1) gene. We found no phenotypic chlorpyrifos resistance in populations from areas with little or no pesticide use. However, there was ~3‐ to 1,000‐fold resistance inH. aztecapopulations from agricultural and/or urban areas, with resistance levels in agriculture being far higher than urban areas due to greater ongoing use of OP and CM pesticides. In every case of resistance inH. azteca, we identified a glycine‐to‐serine amino acid substitution (G119S) that has been shown to confer OP and CM resistance in mosquitoes and has been associated with resistance in other insects. We found that the G119S mutation was always present in a heterozygous state.Further, we provide tentative evidence of anace‐1 gene duplication inH. aztecathat may play a role in chlorpyrifos resistance in some populations. The detection of a genetically based, adaptive OP and CM resistance in some of the same populations ofH. aztecapreviously shown to harbor a genetically based adaptive pyrethroid resistance indicates that these nontarget amphipod populations have become resistant to many of the insecticides now in common use. The terrestrial application of pesticides has provided strong selective pressures to drive evolution in a nontarget, aquatic species.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    A technique to assess the ability of distinctCandidastrains to efflux substrates, as well as to compare the effectiveness of efflux inhibitors, is important for analysis of antifungal drug resistance mechanisms and the mode of action of antifungals. We describe a method that measures the ability ofCandidaspecies to extrude the fluorescent dye Nile red as an output for efflux activity. This involves exposing cells to Nile red and using flow cytometry to quantify cellular fluorescence, enabling numerous samples to be processed in a limited time frame. This protocol provides a simple, yet effective method for quantifying efflux in drug‐resistantCandidaspecies. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC

    Basic Protocol 1: Growth and sample preparation of stainedCandida

    Basic Protocol 2: Quantitative measurement of fluorescence by flow cytometry

    Alternate Protocol: Qualitative determination of fluorescence using microscopy

     
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    Protein labeling strategies have been explored for decades to study protein structure, function, and regulation. Fluorescent labeling of a protein enables the study of protein‐protein interactions through biophysical methods such as microscale thermophoresis (MST). MST measures the directed motion of a fluorescently labeled protein in response to microscopic temperature gradients, and the protein's thermal mobility can be used to determine binding affinity. However, the stoichiometry and site specificity of fluorescent labeling are hard to control, and heterogeneous labeling can generate inaccuracies in binding measurements. Here, we describe an easy‐to‐apply protocol for high‐stoichiometric, site‐specific labeling of a protein at its N‐terminus withN‐hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) esters as a means to measure protein‐protein interaction affinity by MST. This protocol includes guidelines for NHS ester labeling, fluorescent‐labeled protein purification, and MST measurement using a labeled protein. As an example of the entire workflow, we additionally provide a protocol for labeling a ubiquitin E3 enzyme and testing ubiquitin E2‐E3 enzyme binding affinity. These methods are highly adaptable and can be extended for protein interaction studies in various biological and biochemical circumstances. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

    This article was corrected on 18 July 2022. See the end of the full text for details.

    Basic Protocol 1: Labeling a protein of interest at its N‐terminus with NHS esters through stepwise reaction

    Alternate Protocol: Labeling a protein of interest at its N‐terminus with NHS esters through a one‐pot reaction

    Basic Protocol 2: Purifying the N‐terminal fluorescent‐labeled protein and determining its concentration and labeling efficiency

    Basic Protocol 3: Using MST to determine the binding affinity of an N‐terminal fluorescent‐labeled protein to a binding partner.

    Basic Protocol 4: NHS ester labeling of ubiquitin E3 ligase WWP2 and measurement of the binding affinity between WWP2 and an E2 conjugating enzyme by the MST binding assay

     
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    Antibody detection assays are essential for evaluating immunity of individuals against a given virus, and this has been particularly relevant during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Current serology assays either require a laboratory setting and take >1 hr (i.e., enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) or are rapid but only qualitative in nature and cannot accurately track antibody levels over time (i.e., lateral flow assay [LFA]). Therefore, there is a need for development of a rapid and simple but also quantitative assay that can evaluate antibody levels in patients accurately over time. We have developed an assay that uses a split nanoluciferase fused to the spike or nucleocapsid proteins of the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus to enable luminescent‐based detection of spike‐ or nucleocapsid‐binding antibodies in serum, plasma, and whole blood samples. The resulting approach is simple, rapid, and quantitative and is highly amenable to low‐/medium‐throughput scale using plate‐based assays, high‐throughput scale using robotics, and point‐of‐care applications. In this article, we describe how to perform the assay in a laboratory setting using a plate reader or liquid‐handling robotics and in a point‐of‐care setting using a handheld, battery‐powered luminometer. Together, these assays allow antibody detection to be easily performed in multiple settings by simplifying and reducing assay time in a laboratory or clinical environment and by allowing for antibody detection in point‐of‐care, nonlaboratory settings. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

    Basic Protocol: SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody detection using the split‐luciferase assay on a medium‐throughput scale with a laboratory luminometer

    Alternate Protocol 1: High‐throughput‐based protocol for SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody detection using a robotic platform

    Alternate Protocol 2: Point‐of‐care‐based protocol for SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody detection using a handheld luminometer

    Support Protocol: Determining positive/negative cutoffs for test samples and standardizing the assay between days

     
    more » « less