skip to main content

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (NSF-PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 11:00 PM ET on Friday, November 15 until 2:00 AM ET on Saturday, November 16 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Title: Developmental timing differences underlie armor loss across threespine stickleback populations
  more » « less
NSF-PAR ID:
10245551
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley-Blackwell
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Evolution & Development
Volume:
19
Issue:
6
ISSN:
1520-541X
Format(s):
Medium: X Size: p. 231-243
Size(s):
p. 231-243
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    The evolutionary consequences of temporal variation in selection remain hotly debated. We explored these consequences by studying threespine stickleback in a set of bar‐built estuaries along the central California coast. In most years, heavy rains induce water flow strong enough to break through isolating sand bars, connecting streams to the ocean. New sand bars typically re‐form within a few weeks or months, thereby re‐isolating populations within the estuaries. These breaching events cause severe and often extremely rapid changes in abiotic and biotic conditions, including shifts in predator abundance. We investigated whether this strong temporal environmental variation can maintain within‐population variation while eroding adaptive divergence among populations that would be caused by spatial variation in selection. We used neutral genetic markers to explore population structure and then analysed how stickleback armor traits, the associated genesEdaandPitx1and elemental composition (%P) varies within and among populations. Despite strong gene flow, we detected evidence for divergence in stickleback defensive traits andEdagenotypes associated with predation regime. However, this among‐population variation was lower than that observed among other stickleback populations exposed to divergent predator regimes. In addition, within‐population variation was very high as compared to populations from environmentally stable locations. Elemental composition was strongly associated with armor traits,Edagenotype and the presence of predators, thus suggesting that spatiotemporal variation in armor traits generates corresponding variation in elemental phenotypes. We conclude that gene flow, and especially temporal environmental variation, can maintain high levels of within‐population variation while reducing, but not eliminating, among‐population variation driven by spatial environmental variation.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Plant functional strategies change considerably as plants develop, driven by intraindividual variability in anatomical, morphological, physiological and architectural traits.

    Developmental trait variation arises through the complex interplay among genetically regulated phase change (i.e. ontogeny), increases in plant age and size, and phenotypic plasticity to changing environmental conditions. Although spatial drivers of intraspecific trait variation have received extensive research attention, developmentally driven intraspecific trait variation is largely overlooked, despite widespread occurrence.

    Ontogenetic trait variation is genetically regulated, leads to dramatic changes in plant phenotypes and evolves in response to predictable changes in environmental conditions as plants develop.

    Evidence has accumulated to support a general shift from fast to slow relative growth rates and from shade to sun leaves as plants develop from the highly competitive but shady juvenile niche to the stressful adult niche in the systems studied to date.

    Nonetheless, there are major gaps in our knowledge due to examination of only a few environmental factors selecting for the evolution of ontogenetic trajectories, variability in how ontogeny is assigned, biogeographic sampling biases on trees in temperate biomes, dependencies on a few broadly sampled leaf morphological traits and a lack of longitudinal studies that track ontogeny within individuals. Filling these gaps will enhance our understanding of plant functional ecology and provide a framework for predicting the effects of global change threats that target specific ontogenetic stages.

    Read the freePlain Language Summaryfor this article on the Journal blog.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Aim

    Natural selection typically results in the homogenization of reproductive traits, reducing natural variation within populations; thus, highly polymorphic species present unresolved questions regarding the mechanisms that shape and maintain gene flow given a diversity of phenotypes. We used an integrative framework to characterize phenotypic diversity and assess how evolutionary history and population genetics affect the highly polymorphic nature of a California endemic lily.

    Location

    California, United States.

    Taxon

    Butterfly mariposa lily,Calochortus venustus(Liliaceae).

    Methods

    We summarized phenotypic diversity at both metapopulation and subpopulation scales to explore spatial phenotypic distributions. We sampled 174 individuals across the species range representing multiple samples for each population and each phenotype. We used restriction‐site‐associated DNA sequencing (RAD‐Seq) to detect population clusters, gene flow between phenotypes and between populations, infer haplotype networks, and reconstruct ancestral range evolution to infer historical migration and range expansion.

    Results

    Polymorphic floral traits within the species such as petal pigmentation and distal spots are geographically structured, and inferred evolutionary history is consistent with a ring species pattern involving a complex of populations having experienced sequential change in genetic and phenotypic variation from the founding population. Populations remain interconnected yet have differentiated from each other along a bifurcating south‐to‐north range expansion, consequently indicating parallel evolution towards the white morphotype in the northern range. Thus, our phylogeographical analyses reveal morphological convergence with population genetic cohesion irrespective of phenotypic diversity.

    Main conclusions

    Phenotypic variation in the highly polymorphicCalochortus venustusis not due to genetic differentiation between phenotypes; rather there is genetic cohesion within six geographically defined populations, some of which maintain a high level of within‐population phenotypic diversity. Our results demonstrate that analyses of polymorphic taxa greatly benefit from disentangling phenotype from genotype at various spatial scales. We discuss results in light of ring species concepts and the need to determine the adaptive significance of the patterns we report.

     
    more » « less
  4. Seahorses, pipefishes, and seadragons are fishes from the family Syngnathidae that have evolved extraordinary traits including male pregnancy, elongated snouts, loss of teeth, and dermal bony armor. The developmental genetic and cellular changes that led to the evolution of these traits are largely unknown. Recent syngnathid genomes revealed suggestive gene content differences and provide the opportunity for detailed genetic analyses. We created a single cell RNA sequencing atlas of Gulf pipefish embryos to understand the developmental basis of four traits: derived head shape, toothlessness, dermal armor, and male pregnancy. We completed marker gene analyses, built genetic networks, and examined spatial expression of select genes. We identified osteochondrogenic mesenchymal cells in the elongating face that express regulatory genes bmp4, sfrp1a, and prdm16. We found no evidence for tooth primordia cells, and we observed re-deployment of osteoblast genetic networks in developing dermal armor.Finally, we found that epidermal cells expressed nutrient processing and environmental sensing genes, potentially relevant for the brooding environment. The examined pipefish evolutionary innovations are composed of recognizable cell types, suggesting derived features originate from changes within existing gene networks. Future work addressing syngnathid gene networks across multiple stages and species is essential for understanding how their novelties evolved.

     
    more » « less
  5. Abstract Objectives

    The Giles hypothesis posits that differences in the cranial morphology ofPan troglodytesandGorilla gorillaare largely the result of allometric scaling. However, previous support for the Giles hypothesis was based on bivariate plots of linear measurements. This investigation uses geometric morphometric methods to retest this hypothesis and its prediction that extending the ontogenetic trajectory of a chimpanzee would produce an adult gorilla‐like cranial morphology.

    Materials and Methods

    Forty‐three 3D cranial landmarks were collected from an ontogenetic series of 76Pan troglodytesand 58Gorilla gorillaspecimens. Ontogenetic trajectories of cranial shape change were computed via multivariate regression of Procrustes aligned coordinates against LnCS (size vector) and molar eruption stage (developmental vector). These two vectors were then used in developmental simulations to extend the ontogenetic trajectories of adult chimpanzees. Allometric trajectories of chimpanzees and gorillas were also directly compared using Procrustes ANOVA.

    Results

    PanandGorillasignificantly differ in their allometric trajectories, and none of the Pan developmental simulations resembled actual adult gorillas. Additionally, the more thePandevelopmental vector was extended, the more morphologically distinct the simulations became from actual adult gorillas.

    Discussion

    Taken together, these results do not support the Giles hypothesis that allometric scaling is primarily responsible for observed morphological differences between chimpanzee and gorilla crania. This investigation demonstrates that neither “growing” a chimpanzee to the size of a gorilla, nor extending a chimpanzee's developmental shape trajectory will result in an adult gorilla‐like cranial morphology as they differ in their patterns of allometry.

     
    more » « less