Recent advances in Natural Language Interfaces (NLIs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed the way we tackle NLP tasks, shifting the focus towards a more Pragmatics-based perspective. This shift enables more natural interactions between humans and voice assistants, which have historically been difficult to achieve. Pragmatics involves understanding how users often speak out of turn, interrupt one another, or provide relevant information without being explicitly asked (maxim of quantity). To explore this, we developed a digital assistant that continuously listens to conversations and proactively generates relevant visualizations during data exploration tasks. In a within-subject study, participants interacted with both proactive and non-proactive versions of a voice assistant while exploring the Hawaii Climate Data Portal (HCDP). Results suggest that interaction with the proactive assistant increased the total number of utterances and discoveries, facilitated quicker and more reliable insights, and led to greater usage of the system’s chart capabilities. Our study highlights the potential of proactive AI in NLIs and identifies key challenges in its implementation, offering insights for future research.
more »
« less
Look at Me When I Talk to You: A Video Dataset to Enable Voice Assistants to Recognize Errors
People interacting with voice assistants are often frustrated by voice assistants' frequent errors and inability to respond to backchannel cues. We introduce an open-source video dataset of 21 participants' interactions with a voice assistant, and explore the possibility of using this dataset to enable automatic error recognition to inform self-repair. The dataset includes clipped and labeled videos of participants' faces during free-form interactions with the voice assistant from the smart speaker's perspective. To validate our dataset, we emulated a machine learning classifier by asking crowdsourced workers to recognize voice assistant errors from watching soundless video clips of participants' reactions. We found trends suggesting it is possible to determine the voice assistant's performance from a participant's facial reaction alone. This work posits elicited datasets of interactive responses as a key step towards improving error recognition for repair for voice assistants in a wide variety of applications.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1700832
- PAR ID:
- 10249789
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- ArXivorg
- ISSN:
- 2331-8422
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Voice assistants capable of answering user queries during various physical tasks have shown promise in guiding users through complex procedures. However, users often find it challenging to articulate their queries precisely, especially when unfamiliar with the specific terminologies required for machine-oriented tasks. We introduce PrISM-Q&A, a novel question-answering (Q&A) interaction termed step-aware Q&A, which enhances the functionality of voice assistants on smartwatches by incorporating Human Activity Recognition (HAR) and providing the system with user context. It continuously monitors user behavior during procedural tasks via audio and motion sensors on the watch and estimates which step the user is performing. When a question is posed, this contextual information is supplied to Large Language Models (LLMs) as part of the context used to generate a response, even in the case of inherently vague questions like What should I do next with this? Our studies confirmed that users preferred the convenience of our approach compared to existing voice assistants. Our real-time assistant represents the first Q&A system that provides contextually situated support during tasks without camera use, paving the way for the ubiquitous, intelligent assistant.more » « less
-
Voice assistants are becoming increasingly pervasive due to the convenience and automation they provide through the voice interface. However, such convenience often comes with unforeseen security and privacy risks. For example, encrypted traffic from voice assistants can leak sensitive information about their users' habits and lifestyles. In this paper, we present a taxonomy of fingerprinting voice commands on the most popular voice assistant platforms (Google, Alexa, and Siri). We also provide a deeper understanding of the feasibility of fingerprinting third-party applications and streaming services over the voice interface. Our analysis not only improves the state-of-the-art technique but also studies a more realistic setup for fingerprinting voice activities over encrypted traffic.Our proposed technique considers a passive network eavesdropper observing encrypted traffic from various devices within a home and, therefore, first detects the invocation/activation of voice assistants followed by what specific voice command is issued. Using an end-to-end system design, we show that it is possible to detect when a voice assistant is activated with 99% accuracy and then utilize the subsequent traffic pattern to infer more fine-grained user activities with around 77-80% accuracy.more » « less
-
Many companies, including Google, Amazon, and Apple, offer voice assistants as a convenient solution for answering general voice queries and accessing their services. These voice assistants have gained popularity and can be easily accessed through various smart devices such as smartphones, smart speakers, smartwatches, and an increasing array of other devices. However, this convenience comes with potential privacy risks. For instance, while companies vaguely mention in their privacy policies that they may use voice interactions for user profiling, it remains unclear to what extent this profiling occurs and whether voice interactions pose greater privacy risks compared to other interaction modalities. In this paper, we conduct 1171 experiments involving 24530 queries with different personas and interaction modalities during 20 months to characterize how the three most popular voice assistants profile their users. We analyze factors such as labels assigned to users, their accuracy, the time taken to assign these labels, differences between voice and web interactions, and the effectiveness of profiling remediation tools offered by each voice assistant. Our findings reveal that profiling can happen without interaction, can be incorrect and inconsistent at times, may take several days or weeks to change, and is affected by the interaction modality.more » « less
-
Intelligent voice assistants, and the thirdparty apps (aka “skills” or “actions”) that power them, are increasing in popularity and beginning to experiment with the ability to continuously listen to users. This paper studies how privacy concerns related to such always-listening voice assistants might affect consumer behavior and whether certain privacy mitigations would render them more acceptable. To explore these questions with more realistic user choices, we built an interactive app store that allowed users to install apps for a hypothetical always-listening voice assistant. In a study with 214 participants, we asked users to browse the app store and install apps for different voice assistants that offered varying levels of privacy protections. We found that users were generally more willing to install continuously-listening apps when there were greater privacy protections, but this effect was not universally present. The majority did not review any permissions in detail, but still expressed a preference for stronger privacy protections. Our results suggest that privacy factors into user choice, but many people choose to skip this information.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

