An official website of the United States government
As many school districts nationwide continue to incorporate Computer Science (CS) and Computational Thinking (CT) instruction at the K-8 level, it is crucial that we understand the factors and skills, such as reading and math proficiency, that contribute to the success of younger learners in a computing curriculum and are typically developed at this age. Yet, little is known about the relationship between reading and math proficiency, and the learning of key CS concepts at the elementary level. This study focused on 4th-grade students (ages 9-10) who were taught events, sequence, and repetition through an adaptation of the Creative Computing Curriculum. While all students benefited from access to such a curriculum, there were statistically-significant differences in learning outcomes, especially between students whose reading and math proficiency are below grade-level, and students whose proficiency are at or above grade-level. This performance gap suggests the need for curricular improvement and learning strategies that are CS specific for students who struggle with reading and math.
more »
« less
Understanding the Link between Computer Science Instruction and Reading & Math Performance
Worldwide, national initiatives have led to many school districts implementing computing curricula at the primary level. At that age, students are learning the foundational skills of reading and math. It is important to understand how computing can influence the development of these skills. While some argue that learning computing sharpens problem-solving skills that are applicable to other subjects, evidence supporting this belief is thin. In a quasi-experimental study of fourth-grade (ages 9-10) students, we compared state reading and math test scores of students receiving computing instruction with students who did not. Our findings demonstrated that a more open-ended, less scaffolded form of computing instruction was linked to performance gains in math, but not in reading (𝐹 (2, 232) = 11.08, 𝑝 < .01, 𝜂𝑝2 = .0625). When looking at students who face academic challenges that can impact reading and math, the same trend applied to students with economic disadvantages and students with limited English proficiency, but not for students with disabilities. These results suggest that moderately scaffolded computing instruction supports the development of skills applicable to math, a step towards better understanding the relationship between learning opportunities in computing and outcomes in other subjects.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10256866
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’21)
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 408 to 414
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)With the growth of Computer Science (CS) and Computational Thinking (CT) instruction in the primary/elementary domain, it is important that such instruction supports diverse learners. Four categories of students ś students in poverty, multi-lingual students, students with disabilities, and students who have below-grade-level proficiency in reading and math, may face academic challenges that can hinder their learning in CS/CT curricula. However, little is known about how to support these students in CS/CT instruction, especially at this young age. TIPP&SEE, a meta-cognitive strategy that scaffolds learning by proceduralizing engagement through example code, may offer some support. A quasi-experimental study revealed that the gaps between students with and without academic challenges narrowed when using the TIPP&SEE strategy, indicating its promise in providing equitable learning opportunities in CS/CT.more » « less
-
The quantum computing curriculum developed in the Freshman Research Initiative at The University of Texas at Austin caters to students who have not yet studied advanced math and science. We lower the barrier to entry by simplifying notation and teaching through application of the concepts, only covering math methods as they become necessary. Physical motivation and simulation connect with students, and embedded examples and practice problems help cement their understanding. Through learning to program in Python and completing creative technical projects, students gain valuable, transferable skills while exploring quantum information and computing.more » « less
-
Quantum computing presents a paradigmatic shift in the field of computation, in which unintuitive properties of quantum mechanics can be harnessed to change the way we approach a wide range of problems. However, due to the mathematics and physics perspective through which quantum computing is traditionally presented, most resources are inaccessible to many undergraduate students, let alone the general public. It is thus imperative to develop resources and best-practices for quantum computing instruction accessible to students at all levels. In this paper, we describe the development and results of our Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) "Introduction to Quantum Computing for Everyone." This course presents an introduction to quantum computing with few technical prerequisites. In the first half of the course, quantum computing concepts are introduced with a unique, purely visual representation, allowing students to develop conceptual understanding without the burden of learning new mathematical notation. In the second half, students are taught the formal notation for concepts and objects already introduced, reinforcing student understanding of these concepts and providing an applicable context for the technical material. Most notably, we find that introducing the math content in the curriculum's second stage led to no drops in engagement or student performance, suggesting that our curriculum's spiral structure eased the technical burden.more » « less
-
This paper presents a comparison of two instructional strategies meant to help learners better comprehend code and learn programming concepts: reading code examples annotated with expert explanation (worked-out examples) versus scaffolded self-explanation of code examples using an automated system (Intelligent Tutoring System). A randomized controlled trial study was conducted with 90 university students who were assigned to either the control group (reading worked-out examples, a passive strategy) or the experimental group where participants were asked to self-explain and received help, if needed, in the form of questions from the tutoring system( scaffolded self-explanation, an interactive strategy). We found that students with low prior knowledge in the experimental condition had significantly higher learning gains than students with high prior knowledge. However, in the control condition, this distinction in learning outcomes based on prior knowledge was not observed. We also analyzed the effect of self-efficacy on learning gains and the nature of self-explanation. Low self-efficacy students learn almost twice as much in the interactive condition versus the passive condition although the difference was not significant probably because of low sample size. We also found that high self-efficacy students tend to provide more relational explanations whereas low self-efficacy students provide more multi-structural or line-by-line explanations.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3430665.3456313
