skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Can Instructional Prompts Support Effective Learner Behaviors with Tangible and Digital 3D Models?
This study investigated the impact of instructional prompts on how learners interacted with two forms of 3D models during a science education task: tangible (3D prints) or digital (desktop-based) 3D models of fossils from a natural history museum collection. Learners observed and reasoned with 3D models to answer a scientific question. Two forms of instructional prompts were compared: functional prompts to manipulate the models in ways that explored how the fossil may have functioned, and general prompts to manipulate the models in ways that help answer the scientific question. Results suggest that functional prompts encouraged different participant interactions with tangible models, but not with digital models.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1812844
PAR ID:
10262178
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Editor(s):
Gresalfi, M.; Horn, I. S.
Date Published:
Journal Name:
The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020
Volume:
2
Page Range / eLocation ID:
839-840
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. This study investigated the impact of instructional prompts on how learners interacted with two forms of 3D models during a science education task: tangible (3D prints) or digital (desktop-based) 3D models of fossils from a natural history museum collection. Learners used 3D models to engage in observation and reasoning to determine the type of bone that was modeled and whether the dinosaur that the bone came from was a carnivore or herbivore. Two forms of instructional prompts were compared: functional prompts that encouraged learners to manipulate the models in ways that allowed them to determine how the fossil may have functioned in real life, and general prompts that simply encouraged learners to use models to help them complete the task. Results suggest that functional prompts encourage different participant interactions with tangible 3D models, but not with digital 3D models. 
    more » « less
  2. Building a skilled cybersecurity workforce is paramount to building a safer digital world. However, the diverse skill set, constantly emerging vulnerabilities, and deployment of new cyber threats make learning cybersecurity challenging. Traditional education methods struggle to cope with cybersecurity's rapidly evolving landscape and keep students engaged and motivated. Different studies on students' behaviors show that an interactive mode of education by engaging through a question-answering system or dialoguing is one of the most effective learning methodologies. There is a strong need to create advanced AI-enabled education tools to promote interactive learning in cybersecurity. Unfortunately, there are no publicly available standard question-answer datasets to build such systems for students and novice learners to learn cybersecurity concepts, tools, and techniques. The education course material and online question banks are unstructured and need to be validated and updated by domain experts, which is tedious when done manually. In this paper, we propose CyberGen, a novel unification of large language models (LLMs) and knowledge graphs (KG) to generate the questions and answers for cybersecurity automatically. Augmenting the structured knowledge from knowledge graphs in prompts improves factual reasoning and reduces hallucinations in LLMs. We used the knowledge triples from cybersecurity knowledge graphs (AISecKG) to design prompts for ChatGPT and generate questions and answers using different prompting techniques. Our question-answer dataset, CyberQ, contains around 4k pairs of questions and answers. The domain expert manually evaluated the random samples for consistency and correctness. We train the generative model using the CyberQ dataset for question answering task. 
    more » « less
  3. Recently there have been calls to integrate engineering design experiences to support students’ scientific understanding. There is a need for instructional strategies in which learners are encouraged to identify and reflect on ways scientific principles can be applied to inform their designs and evaluate alternative designs. Studies show that the inclusion of contrasting cases can improve students’ conceptual understanding and reasoning. Yet, such tasks depend on how they are scaffolded. In this study, pre-service elementary teachers in a conceptual physics course analyzed contrasting solutions to a design problem. Two forms of scaffolds were embedded to facilitate case evaluation: 1) identify similarities and differences and 2) evaluate and produce an argument for a “good” design solution. We investigated the scientific ideas that the participants used as they contrasted multiple design solutions and the impact of the two approaches in students’ understanding of heat transfer. We found no significant differences in students’ conceptual understanding, but the argumentation condition had a significantly larger number of scientific ideas ‘cited’, ‘explained’ or ‘applied’ in their solutions,. The results suggest that contrasting designs with argumentation may be a promising intervention to facilitate students to use science concepts in engineering design. Future work is needed in order to investigate better scaffolds that can help students’ increase in conceptual learning. 
    more » « less
  4. Recently there have been calls to integrate engineering design experiences to support students’ scientific understanding. There is a need for instructional strategies in which learners are encouraged to identify and reflect on ways scientific principles can be applied to inform their designs and evaluate alternative designs. Studies show that the inclusion of contrasting cases can improve students’ conceptual understanding and reasoning. Yet, such tasks depend on how they are scaffolded. In this study, pre-service elementary teachers in a conceptual physics course analyzed contrasting solutions to a design problem. Two forms of scaffolds were embedded to facilitate case evaluation: 1) identify similarities and differences and 2) evaluate and produce an argument for a “good” design solution. We investigated the scientific ideas that the participants used as they contrasted multiple design solutions and the impact of the two approaches in students’ understanding of heat transfer. We found no significant differences in students’ conceptual understanding, but the argumentation condition had a significantly larger number of scientific ideas ‘cited’, ‘explained’ or ‘applied’ in their solutions,. The results suggest that contrasting designs with argumentation may be a promising intervention to facilitate students to use science concepts in engineering design. Future work is needed in order to investigate better scaffolds that can help students’ increase in conceptual learning. 
    more » « less
  5. NA (Ed.)
    This article describes the use of a digital tool to conduct investigations that allow young children to collect data to answer questions that are interesting and developmentally appropriate for preschoolers. The curricular program is designed as a set of hands-on experiences for preschoolers to engage in problem-solving with data. The digital tool supports the teacher to mediate each step in the investigation process, as preschoolers collaborate to pose a question of interest, identify categories or variables that can help answer the question, proceed through the data collection process, and quickly generate a visualization (graph or tally chart) that drives a deeper discussion or “data talk” to make sense of the data. By maximizing the affordances of technology, data can be efficiently collected while children engage in science practices (e.g. asking questions) and mathematics learning (e.g. gather relevant data, sort and classify by attributes, analysis and interpretation of data). The use of this digital resource amplifies the scaffolding of each investigation, assists in the details of planning and conducting investigations, and provides colorful, engaging visuals to spur discussions about the data in relevant, age-appropriate ways. Throughout the process, children can build on and expand their mathematics and scientific knowledge and skills. 
    more » « less