skip to main content


Title: X-Ray Spectroscopy in the Microcalorimeter Era. III. Line Formation under Case A, Case B, Case C, and Case D in H- and He-like Iron for a Photoionized Cloud
Award ID(s):
1816537
NSF-PAR ID:
10278176
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
The Astrophysical Journal
Volume:
912
Issue:
1
ISSN:
0004-637X
Page Range / eLocation ID:
26
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Gravelly soils have liquefied at multiple sites in at least 27 earthquakes over the past 130 years. These gravels typically contain more than 25% sand which lowers the permeability and makes them susceptible to liquefaction. Developing a reliable, cost-effective liquefaction triggering procedure for gravelly soils has been a challenge for geotechnical engineers. Typical SPT- or CPT-based correlations can be affected by large-size gravel particles and can lead to erroneous results. To deal with these problems, we have developed liquefaction triggering curves for gravelly soils based on (1) shear wave velocity (Vs) and (2) a large diameter cone penetrometer. With a cone diameter of 74 mm, the Chinese Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DPT) is superior to smaller penetrometers and can be economically performed with conventional drilling equipment. Using logistic regression analysis, the DPT has been directly correlated to liquefaction resistance at sites where gravels did and did not liquefy in past earthquakes. Probabilistic liquefaction resistance curves were developed based on 137 data points from 10 different earthquakes in seven countries. Using a similar data set, probabilistic liquefaction triggering curves were also developed based on Vs measurements in gravelly soils. The Vs-based liquefaction triggering curves for gravels shift to the right relative to similar curves based on sands. New magnitude scaling factor (MSF) curves have also been developed specifically for gravel liquefaction which were found to be reasonably consistent with previous curves for sand.

     
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
    This paper describes a systematic study of an approach to Farsi-Spanish low-resource Neural Machine Translation (NMT) that leverages monolingual data for joint learning of forward and backward translation models. As is standard for NMT systems, the training process begins using two pre-trained translation models that are iteratively updated by decreasing translation costs. In each iteration, either translation model is used to translate monolingual texts from one language to another, to generate synthetic datasets for the other translation model. Two new translation models are then learned from bilingual data along with the synthetic texts. The key distinguishing feature between our approach and standard NMT is an iterative learning process that improves the performance of both translation models, simultaneously producing a higher-quality synthetic training dataset upon each iteration. Our empirical results demonstrate that this approach outperforms baselines. 
    more » « less
  3. Keystroke dynamics has gained relevance over the years for its potential in solving practical problems like online fraud and account takeovers. Statistical algorithms such as distance measures have long been a common choice for keystroke authentication due to their simplicity and ease of implementation. However, deep learning has recently started to gain popularity due to their ability to achieve better performance. When should statistical algorithms be preferred over deep learning and vice-versa? To answer this question, we set up experiments to evaluate two state-of-the-art statistical algorithms: Scaled Manhattan and the Instance-based Tail Area Density (ITAD) metric, with a state-of-the-art deep learning model called TypeNet, on three datasets (one small and two large). Our results show that on the small dataset, statistical algorithms significantly outperform the deep learning approach (Equal Error Rate (EER) of 4.3% for Scaled Manhattan / 1.3% for ITAD versus 19.18% for TypeNet ). However, on the two large datasets, the deep learning approach performs better (22.9% & 28.07% for Scaled Manhattan / 12.25% & 20.74% for ITAD versus 0.93% & 6.77% for TypeNet). 
    more » « less