More Like this

1. In Defense of Merit in Science

   https://doi.org/10.35995/jci03010001  

   Abbot, D.; Bikfalvi, A.; Bleske-Rechek, A.L.; Bodmer, W.; Boghossian, P.; Carvalho, C.M.; Ciccolini, J.; Coyne, J.A.; Gauss, J.; Gill, P.M.W.; et al (April 2023, Journal of Controversial Ideas)

   Merit is a central pillar of liberal epistemology, humanism, and democracy. The scientific enterprise, built on merit, has proven effective in generating scientific and technological advances, reducing suffering, narrowing social gaps, and improving the quality of life globally. This perspective documents the ongoing attempts to undermine the core principles of liberal epistemology and to replace merit with non-scientific, politically motivated criteria. We explain the philosophical origins of this conflict, document the intrusion of ideology into our scientific institutions, discuss the perils of abandoning merit, and offer an alternative, human-centered approach to address existing social inequalities. 

   more » « less
2. Defects in deformation twins in plagioclase

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00269-019-01055-9  

   Xie, Dongyue; Hirth, Greg; Hirth, J. P.; Wang, Jian (November 2019, Physics and Chemistry of Minerals)
3. Intersectionality in HCI: lost in translation

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3416498  

   Rankin, Yolanda A.; Thomas, Jakita O.; Joseph, Nicole M. (September 2020, Interactions)

   null (Ed.)
4. Transparency in Practice in Qualitative Research

   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000955  

   Kapiszewski, Diana; Karcher, Sebastian (April 2021, PS: Political Science & Politics)

   null (Ed.)
5. Reconsidering initial Pb in titanite in the context of in situ dating

   https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2020-7274  

   Bonamici, Chloe E Blum (November 2020, American Mineralogist)