More Like this

1. Soft dendritic microparticles with unusual adhesion and structuring properties

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0508-z  

   Roh, Sangchul; Williams, Austin H.; Bang, Rachel S.; Stoyanov, Simeon D.; Velev, Orlin D. (December 2019, Nature Materials)
2. Tunable adhesion properties of hydrolytically degradable aliphatic polyester triblock/diblock copolymer blends

   https://doi.org/10.1039/D5PY00506J  

   Liang, Shuang; Ellison, Christopher J; Hillmyer, Marc A (January 2025, Polymer Chemistry)

   Tuning the molecular architecture of block copolymer blends is a powerful strategy to optimize their performance in pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) formulations. 

   more » « less
3. Dispersion characterizations and adhesion properties of epoxy composites reinforced by carboxymethyl cellulose surface treated carbon nanotubes

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117505  

   Zhang, Dawei; Huang, Ying (May 2022, Powder Technology)
4. Controlled comparative tensile tests of backed versus non‐backed edges’ adhesion: Inferences into stone tool functional properties

   https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.13025  

   Wilson, Michael; Buchanan, Briggs; Fisch, Michael; Bebber, Michelle_R; Eren, Metin_I; Pargeter, Justin (August 2024, Archaeometry)

   Abstract Backing is a procedure for retouching a stone tool edge to an angle of or near 90°. Archaeologists have recorded backed lithic specimens in the Pleistocene and Holocene around the world. One prominent hypothesis for the occurrence of backing is that it increases a stone tool's adhesion relative to what it would have otherwise been with unmodified, sharp edges. We conducted a highly controlled semi‐static tensile test in which we assessed lithic specimens that possessed both a backed and a non‐backed edge, opposing each other. We hafted each specimen's backed and non‐backed edges to wood, and the bi‐hafted stone implement was then pulled apart using an Universal Instron Materials Tester, allowing for a direct ‘head‐to‐head’ comparison of the two edge types’ adhesive properties. Our tensile test results suggested no significant difference between backed and non‐backed edges in terms of adhesion, which does not support the hypothesis that backing increases a lithic specimen's adhesion. 

   more » « less
5. Adhesion directed capillary origami

   https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SM01142A  

   Twohig, Timothy; Croll, Andrew B. (October 2021, Soft Matter)

   Capillary origami takes advantage of the surface forces of a liquid drop to assemble thin film structures. After a structure is assembled, the drop then evaporates away. The transient nature of the liquid drop means that the creation of dry and stable structures is impossible. Work presented in this paper shows that adhesion is, in fact, a key tool that enables the creation of stable, complex, capillary assembled origami structures, rather than a problem to be avoided. Here, polydimethylsiloxane thin films were used in several simple experiments designed to identify the balance between substrate–film adhesion and film–film adhesion in the context of capillary assembly. We then demonstrate how directional adhesion can be used to direct film peeling in order to create non-trivial patterned folds after a fluid drop is deposited. A minimal complex structure, a “double-fold” was created to demonstrate how adhesion uniquely facilitates multiple-step capillary assembly. Finally, a familiar “origami airplane” was created with these methods, demonstrating that adhesion aided capillary origami can be used to assemble complex, functional structures. 

   more » « less