An official website of the United States government
Abstract Natural history collections (NHC) provide a wealth of information that can be used to understand the impacts of global change on biodiversity. As such, there is growing interest in using NHC data to estimate changes in species' distributions and abundance trends over historic time horizons when contemporary survey data are limited or unavailable.However, museum specimens were not collected with the purpose of estimating population trends and thus can exhibit spatiotemporal and collector‐specific biases that can impose severe limitations to using NHC data for evaluating population trajectories.Here we review the challenges associated with using museum records to track long‐term insect population trends, including spatiotemporal biases in sampling effort and sparse temporal coverage within and across years. We highlight recent methodological advancements that aim to overcome these challenges and discuss emerging research opportunities.Specifically, we examine the potential of integrating museum records and other contemporary data sources (e.g. collected via structured, designed surveys and opportunistic citizen science programs) in a unified analytical framework that accounts for the sampling biases associated with each data source. The emerging field of integrated modelling provides a promising framework for leveraging the wealth of collections data to accurately estimate long‐term trends of insect populations and identify cases where that is not possible using existing data sources.
more »
« less
Standards and Best Practices for Monitoring and Benchmarking Insects
Benchmark studies of insect populations are increasingly relevant and needed amid accelerating concern about insect trends in the Anthropocene. The growing recognition that insect populations may be in decline has given rise to a renewed call for insect population monitoring by scientists, and a desire from the broader public to participate in insect surveys. However, due to the immense diversity of insects and a vast assortment of data collection methods, there is a general lack of standardization in insect monitoring methods, such that a sudden and unplanned expansion of data collection may fail to meet its ecological potential or conservation needs without a coordinated focus on standards and best practices. To begin to address this problem, we provide simple guidelines for maximizing return on proven inventory methods that will provide insect benchmarking data suitable for a variety of ecological responses, including occurrence and distribution, phenology, abundance and biomass, and diversity and species composition. To track these responses, we present seven primary insect sampling methods—malaise trapping, light trapping, pan trapping, pitfall trappings, beating sheets, acoustic monitoring, and active visual surveys—and recommend standards while highlighting examples of model programs. For each method, we discuss key topics such as recommended spatial and temporal scales of sampling, important metadata to track, and degree of replication needed to produce rigorous estimates of ecological responses. We additionally suggest protocols for scalable insect monitoring, from backyards to national parks. Overall, we aim to compile a resource that can be used by diverse individuals and organizations seeking to initiate or improve insect monitoring programs in this era of rapid change.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10281746
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
- Volume:
- 8
- ISSN:
- 2296-701X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Monitoring is a crucial tool for measuring the progress and success of environmental policies and management programs. While many studies have evaluated the effectiveness of biodiversity sampling methods, few have compared their efficiency, which is crucial given the funding constraints present in all conservation efforts. In this study we demonstrate how existing analytical tools can be applied to (i) assess the relationship between sampling effort and resulting confidence in biodiversity metrics, and (ii) compare the efficiency of different methods for monitoring biodiversity. We tested this methodology on data from marine fish surveys, including: roving surveys within permanent areas, randomly placed belt transects, and randomly placed transects conducted by citizen scientists using a reduced species list. We constructed efficiency curves describing how increasing effort spent on each method reduced uncertainty in biodiversity estimates and the associated ability to detect change in diversity. All programs produced comparable measurements of species diversity for all metrics despite substantial differences in the species being surveyed by each method. The uncertainty of diversity estimations fell faster and reached a lower level for the roving diver method. Strikingly, the transect method conducted by citizen scientists performed almost identically to the more taxonomically resolved transect method conducted by professional scientists, suggesting that sampling strategies that recorded only a subset of species could still be effective, as long as the excluded species were chosen strategically. The methodology described here can guide decisions about how to measure biodiversity and optimize the resources available for monitoring, ultimately improving management outcomes.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT Long-term terrestrial ecosystem monitoring is a critical component of documenting outcomes of land management actions, assessing progress towards management objectives, and guiding realistic long-term ecological goals, all through repeated observation and measurement. Traditional monitoring methods have evolved for specific applications in forestry, ecology, and fire and fuels management. While successful monitoring programs have clear goals, trained expertise, and rigorous sampling protocols, new advances in technology and data management can help overcome the most common pitfalls in data quality and repeatability. This paper presents Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS), a specific form of LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), as an emerging sampling method that can complement and enhance existing monitoring methods. TLS captures in high resolution the 3D structure of a terrestrial ecosystem (forest, grassland, etc.), and is increasingly efficient and affordable (<$30,000). Integrating TLS into ecosystem monitoring can standardize data collection, improve efficiency, and reduce bias and error. Streamlined data processing pipelines can rigorously analyze TLS data and incorporate constant improvements to inform management decisions and planning. The approach described in this paper utilizes portable, push-button TLS equipment that, when calibrated with initial transect sampling, captures detailed forestry, fuels, and ecological features in less than 5 minutes per plot. We also introduce an interagency automated processing pipeline and dashboard viewer for instant, user-friendly analysis, and data retrieval of hundreds of metrics. Forest metrics and inventories produced with these methods offer effective decision-support data for managers to quantify landscape-scale conditions and respond with efficient action. This protocol further supports interagency compatibility for efficient natural resource monitoring across jurisdictional boundaries with uniform data, language, methods, and data analysis. With continued improvement of scanner capabilities and affordability, these data will shape the future of terrestrial ecosystem monitoring as an important means to address the increasingly fast pace of ecological change facing natural resource managers.more » « less
-
Abstract Extreme events have increased in frequency globally, with a simultaneous surge in scientific interest about their ecological responses, particularly in sensitive freshwater, coastal, and marine ecosystems. We synthesized observational studies of extreme events in these aquatic ecosystems, finding that many studies do not use consistent definitions of extreme events. Furthermore, many studies do not capture ecological responses across the full spatial scale of the events. In contrast, sampling often extends across longer temporal scales than the event itself, highlighting the usefulness of long-term monitoring. Many ecological studies of extreme events measure biological responses but exclude chemical and physical responses, underscoring the need for integrative and multidisciplinary approaches. To advance extreme event research, we suggest prioritizing pre- and postevent data collection, including leveraging long-term monitoring; making intersite and cross-scale comparisons; adopting novel empirical and statistical approaches; and developing funding streams to support flexible and responsive data collection.more » « less
-
Abstract The composition and biodiversity of insect community assemblages are mediated by a complex set of biotic and abiotic factors. Among these factors are forest structure and atmospheric variables (like temperature and humidity), which are heavily influenced by frequent hurricane activity in the Caribbean. Despite this, changes in Caribbean insect assemblages as forests recover from hurricane disturbance are poorly documented. Butterflies represent a charismatic model taxon in biodiversity and conservation, and are thus an ideal subject for exemplifying these shifts in insect abundances and diversity across ecological succession. Here, we monitored butterfly communities in two Puerto Rican forests differing in structure (i.e., canopy height, tree size) to assess butterfly diversity, abundances, and community level wing traits (size and color) over 1 year, beginning 6 months after Hurricane Maria. Monthly sampling over the course of 1 year revealed no relationships between abundances and canopy openness or humidity; instead, species abundances fluctuated seasonally and were nonlinearly correlated with temperature. In contrast, wing size and color were linearly correlated with abiotic variables. Specifically, wings were larger in cooler and more open conditions. Wing color saturation and brightness were negatively correlated with humidity. Our results suggest that, first, a functional approach may provide better insight into the factors mediating species responses to disturbances. Second, further disentangling abundance seasonality from impacts of extreme disturbances necessitates long‐term monitoring. Abstract in Spanish is available with online material.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.579193
