An official website of the United States government
Elicitation studies have become a popular method of participatory design. While traditionally used to examine unimodal gesture interactions, elicitation has started being used with other novel interaction modalities. Unfortunately, there has been no work that examines the impact of referent display on elicited interaction proposals. To address that concern this work provides a detailed comparison between two elicitation studies that were similar in design apart from the way that participants were prompted for interaction proposals (i.e., the referents). Based on this comparison the impact of referent display on speech and gesture interaction proposals are each discussed. The interaction proposals between these elicitation studies were not identical. Gesture proposals were the least impacted by referent display, showing high proposal similarity between the two works. Speech proposals were highly biased by text referents with proposals directly mirroring text-based referents an average of 69.36% of the time. In short, the way that referents are presented during elicitation studies can impact the resulting interaction proposals; however, the level of impact found is dependent on the modality of input elicited.
more »
« less
Understanding Gesture and Speech Multimodal Interactions for Manipulation Tasks in Augmented Reality Using Unconstrained Elicitation
This research establishes a better understanding of the syntax choices in speech interactions and of how speech, gesture, and multimodal gesture and speech interactions are produced by users in unconstrained object manipulation environments using augmented reality. The work presents a multimodal elicitation study conducted with 24 participants. The canonical referents for translation, rotation, and scale were used along with some abstract referents (create, destroy, and select). In this study time windows for gesture and speech multimodal interactions are developed using the start and stop times of gestures and speech as well as the stoke times for gestures. While gestures commonly precede speech by 81 ms we find that the stroke of the gesture is commonly within 10 ms of the start of speech. Indicating that the information content of a gesture and its co-occurring speech are well aligned to each other. Lastly, the trends across the most common proposals for each modality are examined. Showing that the disagreement between proposals is often caused by a variation of hand posture or syntax. Allowing us to present aliasing recommendations to increase the percentage of users' natural interactions captured by future multimodal interactive systems.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1948254
- PAR ID:
- 10283559
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
- Volume:
- 4
- Issue:
- ISS
- ISSN:
- 2573-0142
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 21
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Gesture elicitation studies are a popular means of gaining valuable insights into how users interact with novel input devices. One of the problems elicitation faces is that of legacy bias, when elicited interactions are biased by prior technologies use. In response, methodologies have been introduced to reduce legacy bias. This is the first study that formally examines the production method of reducing legacy bias (i.e., repeated proposals for a single referent). This is done through a between-subject study that had 27 participants per group (control and production) with 17 referents placed in a virtual environment using a head-mounted display. This study found that over a range of referents, legacy bias was not significantly reduced over production trials. Instead, production reduced participant consensus on proposals. However, in the set of referents that elicited the most legacy biased proposals, production was an effective means of reducing legacy bias, with an overall reduction of 11.93% for the chance of eliciting a legacy bias proposal.more » « less
-
Understanding abstract concepts in mathematics has continuously presented as a challenge, but the use of directed and spontaneous gestures has shown to support learning and ground higher-order thought. Within embodied learning, gesture has been investigated as part of a multimodal assemblage with speech and movement, centering the body in interaction with the environment. We present a case study of one dyad’s undertaking of a robotic arm activity, targeting learning outcomes in matrix algebra, robotics, and spatial thinking. Through a body syntonicity lens and drawing on video and pre- and post- assessment data, we evaluate learning gains and investigate the multimodal processes contributing to them. We found gesture, speech, and body movement grounded understanding of vector and matrix operations, spatial reasoning, and robotics, as anchored by the physical robotic arm, with implications for the design of learning environments that employ directed gestures.more » « less
-
Skarnitzl, R. & (Ed.)The timing of both manual co-speech gestures and head gestures is sensitive to prosodic structure of speech. However, head gesters are used not only by speakers, but also by listeners as a backchanneling device. Little research exists on the timing of gestures in back-channeling. To address this gap, we compare timing of listener and speaker head gestures in an interview context. Results reveal the dual role that head gestures play in speech and conversational interaction: while they are coordinated in key ways to one’s own speech, they are also coordinated to the gestures (and hence, the speech) of a conversation partner when one is actively listening to them. We also show that head gesture timing is sensitive to social dynamics between interlocutors. This study provides a novel contribution to literature on head gesture timing and has implications for studies of discourse and accommodation.more » « less
-
Abstract Gestures that accompany speech are an essential part of natural and efficient embodied human communication. The automatic generation of such co‐speech gestures is a long‐standing problem in computer animation and is considered an enabling technology for creating believable characters in film, games, and virtual social spaces, as well as for interaction with social robots. The problem is made challenging by the idiosyncratic and non‐periodic nature of human co‐speech gesture motion, and by the great diversity of communicative functions that gestures encompass. The field of gesture generation has seen surging interest in the last few years, owing to the emergence of more and larger datasets of human gesture motion, combined with strides in deep‐learning‐based generative models that benefit from the growing availability of data. This review article summarizes co‐speech gesture generation research, with a particular focus on deep generative models. First, we articulate the theory describing human gesticulation and how it complements speech. Next, we briefly discuss rule‐based and classical statistical gesture synthesis, before delving into deep learning approaches. We employ the choice of input modalities as an organizing principle, examining systems that generate gestures from audio, text and non‐linguistic input. Concurrent with the exposition of deep learning approaches, we chronicle the evolution of the related training data sets in terms of size, diversity, motion quality, and collection method (e.g., optical motion capture or pose estimation from video). Finally, we identify key research challenges in gesture generation, including data availability and quality; producing human‐like motion; grounding the gesture in the co‐occurring speech in interaction with other speakers, and in the environment; performing gesture evaluation; and integration of gesture synthesis into applications. We highlight recent approaches to tackling the various key challenges, as well as the limitations of these approaches, and point toward areas of future development.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3427330
