skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Learning Theory, Classroom Assessment, and Equity
Despite increasing awareness about the role of classroom assessments in perpetuating educational inequities, the research community continues to struggle with how to support teachers to design and use classroom assessments for achieving equity. In response to recent calls to better connect learning theory to the design of classroom assessments, we explore the links among contemporary learning theories, classroom assessments, equity, and teachers’ professional learning. Building a conceptual argument that we should shift our attention from assessment tasks to a classroom activity system to better support minoritized students’ learning via classroom assessment, we examine how teachers participate in assessment codesign activities in two research-practice partnerships (RPPs), and then identify emerging tensions in relation to promoting equity. Each RPP drew upon contemporary learning theories—sociocognitive and sociocultural learning theories, respectively—to create a coherent system of curriculum, instruction, and assessment. The examples show that the tensions emerging from each project are at least partially related to the learning theory that led the researchers to set up professional learning settings in a particular way. Our findings suggest that managing these tensions is an inherent part of the work as researchers seek to support equitable student learning. We discuss specific implications for the assessment community.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1846227
PAR ID:
10287047
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Educational measurement issues and practice
ISSN:
0731-1745
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; (, Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education)
    Cook, S; Katz, B; Moore_Russo, D (Ed.)
    an assemblage of argumentation analytic methods that can support research about faculty learning communities interacting across substantive differences. Drawing on our research with a cross-institutional faculty online learning community, we use data to show how theories from discourse analysis, systemic functional linguistics, and argumentation modeling can be operationalized to support researchers in brooking methodological tensions, including framing argumentation as the topic of or a resource for investigation and considerations of collaborative discourse as both process and content. Our methodological findings illustrate an example of this operationalization, highlighting analysis of transdisciplinary, collaborative discourse in a community composed of instructors of college geometry courses required for pre-service teachers. We share possible uses for this methodological approach vis-a-vis research about the professional work of undergraduate mathematics education and pre-service teacher preparation. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings)
    Research based assessments have a productive and storied history in PER. While useful for conducting research on student learning, their utility is limited for instructors interested in improving their own courses. We have developed a new assessment design process that leverages three-dimensional learning, evidence-centered design, and self-regulated learning to deliver actionable feedback to instructors about supporting their students' learning. We are using this approach to design the Thermal and Statistical Physics Assessment (TaSPA), which also allows instructors to choose learning goals that align with their teaching. Perhaps more importantly, this system will be completely automated when it is completed, making the assessment scalable with minimal burden on instructors and researchers. This work represents an advancement in how we assess physics learning at a large scale and how the PER community can better support physics instructors and students. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, 2023 AERA Annual Meeting)
    Although the professional learning opportunities for teachers to introduce computational thinking (CT) into K-12 education are increasing, it remains challenging to support teachers in integrating CT into their everyday classroom practices. In this study, we have identified six elementary teachers who showed evident eagerness or reluctance in a CT integration professional learning experience. We further analyzed the emerging verbal and non-verbal participation patterns of eagerness and reluctance and the challenges teachers have encountered in the professional learning experience. The results shed light on how to better understand and address the challenges in creating sustainable and effective professional learning. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; (, Institute for Scientist & Engineer Educators (ISEE))
    Seagroves, Scott; Barnes, Austin; Metevier, Anne; Porter, Jason; Hunter, Lisa (Ed.)
    The ISEE PDP program offers vital support to graduate students that is often missing in the U.S. doctoral training tradition. This panel will explore some of the advantages and uses of the ISEE methodology in a variety of educational and also professional settings. First, we explore the relationships between learner identities and outcomes, including the benefits of “facilitation for equity” in the classroom, to facilitate research discussions, and beyond. Second, the paper delves into “backward design” as a method for establishing learning outcomes, curricular plans, and translating theory into practice. Finally, we discuss how ISEE concepts can help all learners of all ages and backgrounds to navigate their career goals and vision, including teaching educators and researchers how to use goal-oriented curricular development. While each vignette approaches the subject from different angles and professions, the structured planning and theory behind curricular design holds true across a variety of settings. 
    more » « less
  5. ; (, ACM)
    A research-practice partnership (RPP) used a teacher co-design process, supported by equity-focused professional development, to create an elementary-level curriculum that integrates content, practices, and learning progressions from state computing standards with other standards-based curricula. Most district students are part of historically marginalized groups and the RPP chose to develop an equity and inclusion-focused curriculum that would be taught in all elementary classrooms to all students. Twelve teacher teams, supported by researchers and ELL and SPED specialists, designed, piloted, and documented 23 modules of 4-8, 45-minute lessons across K-5. Early adopter teachers followed the pilots and implemented the modules in their classrooms with the goal of facilitating adoption by all elementary classroom teachers. After being interrupted by the pandemic, the RPP developed a strategy where principals in cohorts of schools agreed to collaborate with RPP school-based lead teachers to establish professional learning communities (PLCs) to support classroom implementation of the modules. Eleven schools participated in a 2021-22 cohort and nine more schools joined in 2022-23. Centering equity, PLCs, and quality module documentation and materials are key to sustaining and evolving the CSforAll curriculum. The modules were revised based on feedback obtained from ELL and SPED specialists, early adopters, teacher coordinators, researchers, and district curriculum directors. Using a large data set of meeting and classroom observation records, interviews, field notes, focus groups, surveys, and module documentation, we track the evolution of the curriculum and provide a detailed analysis of one module as an example. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email