skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Porosity and Location-Dependent Variation of Trabecular Length and Trabecular Number per Connection in Human Calcanei
Award ID(s):
1662970
PAR ID:
10294312
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
8th World Congress of Biomechanics
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Captive (zoo) specimens in natural history collections allow researchers to inspect the morphologies of rare or CITES-listed taxa, but the lifestyles, diets, and lifespans of captive animals differ from those of their wild counterparts. To quantify these differences, we compared trabecular bone architecture (TBA) of dorsal vertebrae in captive and wild specimens of xenarthran mammals (anteaters, armadillos, and sloths). Because TBA develops following in-vivo bone force regimes, it reflects ecology and behavior, but this also means that it may differ between captive and wild specimens of the same species. We collected μCT scans of the last six presacral vertebrae in 15 species of fossorial, terrestrial, and suspensorial xenarthrans ranging in body mass from 120g (Chlamyphorus) to 35kg (Myrmecophaga). For each vertebra, we measured bone volume fraction (BVF), trabecular number (TbN), mean trabecular thickness (TbTh), degree of anisotropy, and trabecular orientation. We found that wild specimens generally have a greater BVF, TbN, and TbTh than captive specimens, but that these metrics differ by species, vertebral position, ecology, and pathology. Wild specimens of Dasypus have greater BVF, TbN, and TbTh than captive specimens in the three most posterior lumbar vertebrae, but have much closer metrics in the anterior three vertebrae. In Choloepus, BVF, TbN, and TbTn are greater in wild specimens in the anterior vertebrae and more similar in the posterior vertebrae. Arthritis in captive Tamandua increased BVF and TbTh, whereas wild specimens had greater TbN. Our results add to overall understanding of variation in mammalian vertebral trabecular bone, and suggest caution when including captive specimens in research on the relationship between TBA and ecology. 
    more » « less
  2. The regionalized vertebral column is a hallmark of mammalian morphology and reflects functional differentiation of the vertebral regions. Mammalian vertebrae are serially homologous and morphologically patterened by Hox expression, but also vary in number and gross morphology across species. The trabecular bone inside vertebral centra is more plastic than gross vertebral bone, and structurally adapts to better withstand forces it experiences during life. However, the functional regionalization of vertebral trabecular bone is poorly examined. Are there trabecular "regions” reflecting the differing functions and in-vivo stress patterns of gross morphological vertebral regions? Or is trabecular morphology homogeneous throughout the spine, suggesting that differences in functional demands are borne exclusively by external characteristics? To address these questions, we collected μCT scans and linear measurements of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebrae in four species of large shrews, including two species of the hero shrew Scutisorex, which has a highly modified vertebral column. We compared linear measurements and trabecular bone characteristics of the cranial and caudal ends of each centrum across species. To detect unique vertebral regions, we executed principal coordinates analysis and segmented regression on three versions of our data set: trabecular bone data only, external measurements only, and the two combined. We found that some regionalization is recovered using only trabecular bone data, but trabecular bone regions do not correspond exactly to gross vertebral regions. This reflects divergence between the functional signals of internal and external vertebral bone morphology, which should be further examined in a kinematic context. 
    more » « less