Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Algorithmic Journalism and Its Impacts on Work
In the artificial intelligence era, algorithmic journalists can produce news reports in natural language from structured data thanks to natural language generation (NLG) algorithms. This paper presents several algorithmic content generation models and discusses the impacts of algorithmic journalism on work within a framework consisting of three levels: replacing tasks of journalists, increasing efficiency, and developing new capabilities within journalism. The findings indicate that algorithmic journalism technology may lead some changes in journalism by enabling individual users to produce their own stories. This paper may contribute to an understanding of how algorithmic news is created and how algorithmic journalism technology impacts work.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2026583
PAR ID:
10301595
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
C+J 2020 Symposium
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; (, ACM)
    Recent discussions at the intersection of journalism, HCI, and human-centered computing ask how technologies can help create reader-oriented news experiences. The current paper takes up this initiative by focusing on immigrant readers, a group who reports significant difficulties engaging with mainstream news yet has received limited attention in prior research. We report findings from our co-design research with eleven immigrant readers living in the United States and seven journalists working in the same region, aiming to enhance the news experience of the former. Data collected from all participants revealed an “unaddressed-or-unaccountable” paradox that challenges value alignment across immigrant readers and journalists. This paradox points to four metaphors regarding how conversational AI agents can be designed to assist news reading. Each metaphor requires conversational AI, journalists, and immigrant readers to coordinate their shared responsibilities in a distinct manner. These findings provide insights into reader-oriented news experiences with AI in the loop. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, Computational Journalism Symposium)
    Concerns about the spread of misinformation online via news articles have led to the development of many tools and processes involving human annotation of their credibility. However, much is still unknown about how different people judge news credibility or the quality or reliability of news credibility ratings from populations of varying expertise. In this work, we consider credibility ratings from two “crowd” populations: 1) students within journalism or media programs, and 2) crowd workers on UpWork, and compare them with the ratings of two sets of experts: journalists and climate scientists, on a set of 50 climate-science articles. We find that both groups’ credibility ratings have higher correlation to journalism experts compared to the science experts, with 10-15 raters to achieve convergence. We also find that raters’ gender and political leaning impact their ratings. Among article genre of news/opinion/analysis and article source leaning of left/center/right, crowd ratings were more similar to experts respectively with opinion and strong left sources. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; (, Computational Journalism C+J)
    null (Ed.)
    Concerns about the spread of misinformation online via news articles have led to the development of many tools and processes involving human annotation of their credibility. However, much is still unknown about how different people judge news credibility or the quality or reliability of news credibility ratings from populations of varying expertise. In this work, we consider credibility ratings from two “crowd” populations: 1) students within journalism or media programs, and 2) crowd workers on UpWork, and compare them with the ratings of two sets of experts: journalists and climate scientists, on a set of 50 climate-science articles. We find that both groups’ credibility ratings have higher correlation to journalism experts compared to the science experts, with 10-15 raters to achieve convergence. We also find that raters’ gender and political leaning impact their ratings. Among article genre of news/opinion/analysis and article source leaning of left/center/right, crowd ratings were more similar to experts respectively with opinion and strong left sources. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; (, Science Communication)
    Environmental journalists, as gatekeepers, often become arbiters of risk and benefit information. This study explores how their routine news value judgments may influence reporting on marine aquaculture, a growing domestic industry with complex social and ecological impacts. We interviewed New England newspaper journalists using Q methodology, a qualitative dominant mixed-method approach to study shared subjectivity in small samples. Results revealed four distinct reporting perspectives—“state structuralist,” “neighborhood preservationist,” “industrial futurist,” and “local proceduralist”—stemming from the news value and objectivity routines journalists used in news selection. Findings suggest implications for public understanding of, and positionality toward, natural resource use and development. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; (, Statistical Language and Speech Processing)
    Espinosa-Anke, Luis; Martín-Vide, Carlos; Spasić, Irena (Ed.)
    Algorithmic journalism refers to automatic AI-constructed news stories. There have been successful commercial implementations for news stories in sports, weather, financial reporting and similar domains with highly structured, well defined tabular data sources. Other domains such as local reporting have not seen adoption of algorithmic journalism, and thus no automated reporting systems are available in these categories which can have important implications for the industry. In this paper, we demonstrate a novel approach for producing news stories on government legislative activity, an area that has not widely adopted algorithmic journalism. Our data source is state legislative proceedings, primarily the transcribed speeches and dialogue from floor sessions and committee hearings in US State legislatures. Specifically, we create a library of potential events called phenoms. We systematically analyze the transcripts for the presence of phenoms using a custom partial order planner. Each phenom, if present, contributes some natural language text to the generated article: either stating facts, quoting individuals or summarizing some aspect of the discussion. We evaluate two randomly chosen articles with a user study on Amazon Mechanical Turk with mostly Likert scale questions. Our results indicate a high degree of achievement for accuracy of facts and readability of final content with 13 of 22 users in the first article and 19 of 20 subjects of the second article agreeing or strongly agreeing that the articles included the most important facts of the hearings. Other results strengthen this finding in terms of accuracy, focus and writing quality. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Text Encoded Conversion
  • XML
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email