More Like this

1. The information won't just sink in: Helping teachers provide technology‐assisted data literacy instruction in social studies

   https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13255  

   Shreiner, Tamara L. ; Guzdial, Mark ( July 2022 , British Journal of Educational Technology)

   In this study, support for teaching data literacy in social studies is provided through the design of a pedagogical support system informed by participatory design sessions with both pre‐service and in‐service social studies teachers. It provides instruction on teaching and learning data literacy in social studies, examples of standards‐based lesson plans, made‐to‐purpose data visualization tools and minimal manuals that put existing online tools in a social studies context. Based on case studies of eleven practicing teachers, this study provides insight into features of technology resources that social studies teachers find usable and useful for using data visualizations as part of standards‐ and inquiry‐based social studies instruction, teaching critical analysis of data visualizations and helping students create data visualizations with online computing tools. The final result, though, is that few of our participating teachers have yet adopted the provided resources into their own classrooms, which highlights weaknesses of the technology acceptance model for describing teacher adoption.

   What is already known about this topic

   Data literacy is an important part of social studies education in the United States.

   Most teachers do not teach data literacy as a part of social studies.

   Teachers may adopt technology to help them teach data literacy if they think it is useful and usable.

   What this paper adds

   Educational technology can help teachers learn about data literacy in social studies.

   Social studies teachers want simple tools that fit with their existing curricula, give them new project ideas and help students learn difficult concepts.

   Making tools useful and usable does not predict adoption; context plays a large role in a social studies teachers' adoption.

   Implications for practice and/or policy

   Designing purpose‐built tools for social studies teachers will encourage them to teach data literacy in their classes.

   Professional learning opportunities for teachers around data literacy should include opportunities for experimentation with tools.

   Teachers are not likely to use tools if they are not accompanied by lesson and project ideas.

    

   more » « less
2. Tensions and synergies in arts‐integrated data literacy instruction: Reflections on four classroom implementations

   https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13257  

   Matuk, Camillia ; DesPortes, Kayla ; Amato, Anna ; Vacca, Ralph ; Silander, Megan ; Woods, Peter J. ; Tes, Marian ( July 2022 , British Journal of Educational Technology)

   Data‐art inquiry is an arts‐integrated approach to data literacy learning that reflects the multidisciplinary nature of data literacy not often taught in school contexts. By layering critical reflection over conventional data inquiry processes, and by supporting creative expression about data, data‐art inquiry can support students' informal inference‐making by revealing the role of context in shaping the meaning of data, and encouraging consideration of the personal and social relevance of data. Data‐art inquiry additionally creates alternative entry points into data literacy by building on learners' non‐STEM interests. Supported by technology, it can provide accessible tools for students to reflect on and communicate about data in ways that can impact broader audiences. However, data‐art inquiry instruction faces many barriers to classroom implementation, particularly given the tendency for schools to structure learning with disciplinary silos, and to unequally prioritize mathematics and the arts. To explore the potential of data‐art inquiry in classroom contexts, we partnered with arts and mathematics teachers to co‐design and implement data‐art inquiry units. We implemented the units in four school contexts that differed in terms of the student population served, their curriculum priorities, and their technology infrastructure. We reflect on participant interviews, written reflections, and classroom data, to identify synergies and tensions between data literacy, technology, and the arts. Our findings highlight how contexts of implementation shape the possibilities and limitations for data‐art inquiry learning. To take full advantage of the potential for data‐art inquiry, curriculum design should account for and build on the opportunities and constraints of classroom contexts.

   What is already known about this topic

   Arts‐integrated instruction has underexplored potential for promoting students' data literacy, including their appreciation for the role of context and real‐world implications of data and for the personal and social relevance of data.

   Arts‐integrated instruction is difficult to implement in school contexts that are constrained by disciplinary silos.

   What this paper adds

   Descriptions of four data‐art inquiry units, which take an arts‐integrated approach to data literacy.

   Examples of the synergies and tensions observed between data literacy, technology, and the arts during classroom implementation in four different schools.

   Reflections on the role of school contexts in shaping disciplinary synergies and tensions.

   Implications for practice and/or policy

   Arts‐integration offers opportunities for data literacy learning.

   Consideration of the unique resources and constraints of classroom contexts is critical for fulfilling the promises of data‐art inquiry learning.

   There is a need to develop school support specific to arts‐integrated data literacy instruction.

    

   more » « less
3. Co‐designing teacher support technology for problem‐based learning in middle school science

   https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13363  

   Hutchins, Nicole M. ; Biswas, Gautam ( July 2023 , British Journal of Educational Technology)

   This paper provides an experience report on a co‐design approach with teachers to co‐create learning analytics‐based technology to support problem‐based learning in middle school science classrooms. We have mapped out a workflow for such applications and developed design narratives to investigate the implementation, modifications and temporal roles of the participants in the design process. Our results provide precedent knowledge on co‐designing with experienced and novice teachers and co‐constructing actionable insight that can help teachers engage more effectively with their students' learning and problem‐solving processes during classroom PBL implementations.

   What is already known about this topic

   Success of educational technology depends in large part on the technology's alignment with teachers' goals for their students, teaching strategies and classroom context.

   Teacher and researcher co‐design of educational technology and supporting curricula has proven to be an effective way for integrating teacher insight and supporting their implementation needs.

   Co‐designing learning analytics and support technologies with teachers is difficult due to differences in design and development goals, workplace norms, and AI‐literacy and learning analytics background of teachers.

   What this paper adds

   We provide a co‐design workflow for middle school teachers that centres on co‐designing and developing actionable insights to support problem‐based learning (PBL) by systematic development of responsive teaching practices using AI‐generated learning analytics.

   We adapt established human‐computer interaction (HCI) methods to tackle the complex task of classroom PBL implementation, working with experienced and novice teachers to create a learning analytics dashboard for a PBL curriculum.

   We demonstrate researcher and teacher roles and needs in ensuring co‐design collaboration and the co‐construction of actionable insight to support middle school PBL.

   Implications for practice and/or policy

   Learning analytics researchers will be able to use the workflow as a tool to support their PBL co‐design processes.

   Learning analytics researchers will be able to apply adapted HCI methods for effective co‐design processes.

   Co‐design teams will be able to pre‐emptively prepare for the difficulties and needs of teachers when integrating middle school teacher feedback during the co‐design process in support of PBL technologies.

    

   more » « less
4. The biodesign studio: Constructions and reflections of high school youth on making with living media

   https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13081  

   Walker, Justice T. ; Kafai, Yasmin B. ( March 2021 , British Journal of Educational Technology)

   Most constructionist efforts have focused on supporting learners with tools for designing with digital and/or physical media. Recent developments in life sciences now allow K‐12 learners to design with living materials, or to biodesign. In this paper, we report on the development of a biodesign studio activity called biocakes wherein teams of high school youth genetically modified a yeast strain to bake a nutrient fortified food product. Using a qualitative deductive analysis of classroom observations, interviews and projects, we examined high school youth experiences and reflections of these activities to answer three research questions: (1) What kind of artefacts did youth make with living media? (2) How did youth engage in biodesign? and (3) What did youth have to say about their biodesign experiences? We discuss how our analyses of biodesign applications highlight the importance of assembly practices, social engagement and imaginative design for constructionist learning. These insights provide compelling examples for designing with living media in K‐12 education.

   What is already known about this topic?

   Constructionist perspectives shape important ideas about what we know about science learning, and notably in computer science fields.

   One widely taken up example includes making, where learners use crafts to make interactive computational objects.

   In life science, constructionism also provides insights about learning using digital media to model biological systems or interact with living materials.

   What this paper adds?

   This paper extends these perspectives by examining production and engagement when learners constructwithliving materials—an approach that has only recently been possible with the development of accessible wet lab tools.

   We frame learning activities as a studio model—that emphasised application design, iteration and critique—to better assess the roles assembly, construction and speculative design play in production that uses living materials.

   Our findings suggest that assembly is important for creating accessible points of entry to complex biological fabrication processes.

   We also find that speculative design provides an opportunity for learners to extend their existing abilities beyond what is otherwise available given their expertise or access to resources, and thus expansively explore related ideas.

   Implications for practice and/or policy

   Assembly and speculative design have important places in constructionist‐driven production with living materials and could, therefore, be leveraged in practice.

    

   more » « less
5. Seeds of (r)Evolution: Constructionism Co-Design with High School Science Teachers

   Kelter, J. ; Peel, A. ; Bain, C. ; Anton, G. ; Dabholkar, S. ; Aslan, U. ; Horn, M.S. ; Wilensky, U. ( June 2020 , Constructionism 2020)

   In the decades since Papert published Mindstorms (1980), computation has transformed nearly every branch of scientific practice. Accordingly, there is increasing recognition that computation and computational thinking (CT) must be a core part of STEM education in a broad range of subjects. Previous work has demonstrated the efficacy of incorporating computation into STEM courses and introduced a taxonomy of CT practices in STEM. However, this work rarely involved teachers as more than implementers of units designed by researchers. In The Children’s Machine, Papert asked “What can be done to mobilize the potential force for change inherent in the position of teachers?” (Papert, 1994, pg. 79). We argue that involving teachers as co-design partners supports them to be cultural change agents in education. We report here on the first phase of a research project in which we worked with STEM educators to co-design curricular science units that incorporate computational thinking and practices. Eight high school teachers and one university professor joined nine members of our research team for a month-long Computational Thinking Summer Institute (CTSI). The co-design process was a constructionist design and learning experience for both the teachers and researchers. We focus here on understanding the co-design process and its implications for teachers by asking: (1) How did teachers shift in their attitudes and confidence regarding CT? (2) What different co-design styles emerged and did any tensions arise? Generally, we found that teachers gained confidence and skills in CT and computational tools over the course of the summer. Only one teacher reported a decrease in confidence in one aspect of CT (computational modeling), but this seemed to result from gaining a broader and more nuanced understanding of this rich area. A range of co-design styles emerged over the summer. Some teachers chose to focus on designing the curriculum and advising on the computational tools to be used in it, while leaving the construction of those tools to their co-designers. Other teachers actively participated in constructing models and computational tools themselves. The pluralism of co-design styles allowed teachers of various comfort levels with computation to meaningfully contribute to a computationally enhanced constructionist curriculum. However, it also led to a tension for some teachers between working to finish their curriculum versus gaining experience with computational tools. In the time crunch to complete their unit during CTSI, some teachers chose to save time by working on the curriculum while their co-design partners (researchers) created the supporting computational tools. These teachers still grew in their computational sophistication, but they could not devote as much time as they wanted to their own computational learning. 

   more » « less