The production mechanism for terrestrial gamma ray flashes (TGFs) is not entirely understood, and details of the corresponding lightning activity and thunderstorm charge structure have yet to be fully characterized. Here we examine sub‐microsecond VHF (14–88 MHz) radio interferometer observations of a 247‐kA peak‐current EIP, or energetic in‐cloud pulse, a reliable radio signature of a subset of TGFs. The EIP consisted of three high‐amplitude sferic pulses lasting
This study employed a parallel-plate capacitor model by which the electrostatic energy of lightning flashes could be estimated by considering only their physical dimensions and breakdown electric fields in two simulated storms. The capacitor model has previously been used to approximate total storm electrostatic energy but is modified here to use the geometry of individual lightning flashes to mimic the local charge configuration where flashes were initiated. The energy discharged may then be diagnosed without context of a storm’s entire charge structure. The capacitor model was evaluated using simulated flashes from two storms modeled by the National Severe Storms Laboratory’s Collaborative Model for Multiscale Atmospheric Simulation (COMMAS). Initial capacitor model estimates followed the temporal evolution of the flash discharge energy of COMMAS for each storm but demonstrated the need to account for an adjustment factor
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10303133
- Publisher / Repository:
- American Meteorological Society
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
- Volume:
- 78
- Issue:
- 12
- ISSN:
- 0022-4928
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- p. 3909-3924
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract ≃ 60μ s in total, which peaked during the second (main) pulse. The EIP occurred during a normal‐polarity intracloud lightning flash that was highly unusual, in that the initial upward negative leader was particularly fast propagating and discharged a highly concentrated region of upper‐positive storm charge. The flash was initiated by a high‐power (46 kW) narrow bipolar event (NBE), and the EIP occurred about 3 ms later after≃ 3 km upward flash development. The EIP was preceded≃ 200μ s by a fast6 × 106 m/s upward negative breakdown and immediately preceded and accompanied by repeated sequences of fast (107 –108 m/s) downward then upward streamer events each lasting 10 to 20μ s, which repeatedly discharged a large volume of positive charge. Although the repeated streamer sequences appeared to be a characteristic feature of the EIP and were presumably involved in initiating it, the EIP sferic evolved independently of VHF‐producing activity, supporting the idea that the sferic was produced by relativistic discharge currents. Moreover, the relativistic currents during the main sferic pulse initiated a strong NBE‐like event comparable in VHF power (115 kW) to the highest‐power NBEs. -
more » « less
Abstract In Part I, an electrification scheme was described and a simulation of an observed cold-based storm from the U.S. Great Plains was validated with electrical observations. Most charge in the storm was separated by rebounding collisions of secondary ice originating from prior graupel–snow collisions. In this Part II, sensitivity tests are performed with the control simulation (Part I) and influences from environmental factors (aerosols, temperature, moisture, and shear) on lightning are elucidated. Environmental factors [e.g., convective available potential energy (CAPE)] controlling updraft speed are salient. When ascent is reduced by 30% and 70%, flashes become 70% fewer and disappear, respectively; faster ascent promotes positive cloud-to-ground (+CGs) flashes. Since cloud base is too cold (1°C) for coalescence, cloud condensation nucleus aerosol concentrations do not influence the lightning appreciably. The electrical response to varying concentrations of active ice nuclei is limited by most ice particles being secondary and less sensitive—a natural “buffer.” Imposing a maritime sounding suggests that the land–sea contrast in lightning for such storms is due to the vertical structure of environmental temperature and humidity. Weak CAPE, and both entrainment and condensate weight from a low cloud base, suppress ascent and charging. Maritime thermodynamic conditions reduce simulated flash rates by two orders of magnitude. Reducing aerosol loadings from continental to maritime only slightly reinforces this suppression. Last, a conceptual model is provided for how any simulated storm is either normal because graupel/hail is mostly positively charged or else is inverted/anomalous because graupel/hail is mostly negatively charged, with environmental factors controlling the charging. Impacts from microphysical processes, including three processes of secondary ice production, on lightning are analyzed.
-
more » « less
Abstract Lightning is frequently initiated within the convective regions of thunderstorms, and so flash rates tend to follow trends in updraft speed and volume. It has been suggested that lightning production is linked to the turbulent flow generated by updrafts as turbulent eddies organize charged hydrometeors into complex charge structures. These complex charge structures consist of local regions of increased charge magnitudes between which flash-initiating electric fields may be generated. How turbulent kinematics influences lightning production, however, remains unclear. In this study, lightning flashes produced in a multicell and two supercell storms simulated using The Collaborative Model for Multiscale Atmospheric Simulation (COMMAS) were examined to identify the kinematic flow structures within which they occurred. By relating the structures of updrafts to thermals, initiated lightning flashes were expected to be located where the rate of strain and rotational flow are equal, or between updraft and eddy flow features. Results showed that the average lightning flash is initiated in kinematic flow structures dominated by vortical flow patterns, similar to those of thermals, and the structures’ kinematics are characterized by horizontal vorticity and vertical shearing. These kinematic features were common across all cases and demonstrated that where flash-initiating electric fields are generated is along the periphery of updrafts where turbulent eddies are produced. Careful consideration of flow structures near initiated flashes is consistent with those of thermals rising through a storm.
-
more » « less
Abstract In an effort to improve our knowledge on the horizontal and vertical distribution of lightning initiation and propagation, ~500 multicells (producing a total of 72,619 flashes), 27 mesoscale convective systems (producing 214,417 flashes) and 23 supercells (producing 169,861 flashes) that occurred over northern Alabama and southern Tennessee were analyzed using data from the North Alabama Lightning Mapping Array and the Multi‐Radar Multi‐Sensor suite. From this analysis, two‐dimensional (2‐D) histograms of where flashes initiated and propagated relative to radar reflectivity and altitude were created for each storm type. The peak of the distributions occurred between 8.0 and 10.0 km (−24.0 to −38.5 °C) and between 30 and 35 dB
Z for flashes that initiated within multicellular storms. For flashes that initiated within mesoscale convective systems, these peaks were 8.0–9.0 km (−27.1 to −34.6 °C) and 30–35 dBZ , respectively, and for supercells, they were 10.0–12.0 km (−42.6 to −58.1 °C) and 35–40 dBZ , respectively. The 2‐D histograms for the flash propagations were slightly different than for the flash initiations and showed that flashes propagated in lower reflectivities as compared to where they initiated. The 2‐D histograms were also compared to test cases; the root‐mean‐square errors and the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient (R ) were calculated with several of the comparisons havingR values >0.7 while the root‐mean‐square errors were always ≤0.017 (≤10%), irrespective of storm type. Finally, the mean flash sizes for the multicell, mesoscale convective system, and supercell flashes were 8.3, 9.9, and 7.4 km, respectively. -
more » « less
Abstract The properties of the first 5–12 classic initial breakdown pulses (IBPs) of three cloud‐to‐ground (CG) lightning flashes were determined using a modified transmission line model. As part of the modeling, the current with respect to time of each IBP was determined from the measured electric field changes at multiple sites using three theoretical methods called Hilbert transform, Hertzian dipole, and matrix inversion. In the transmission line modeling the length of each IBP was estimated from high‐speed video data of the IBPs. The modeling provided the following properties of the larger classic IBPs in each flash: peak current, velocity, total charge, charge moment, radiated power, and total energy dissipated for successive IB pulses in three developing lightning flashes. For the main initial leader channel in the three CG flashes (and for one long branch), IBP peak current was largest for the first or second classic IBP and declined mostly monotonically with successive IBPs. For the same channels, IBP current velocity was smallest for the first classic IBP and increased mostly monotonically with successive IBPs. The smallest velocities were (2.0, 2.5, 2.5, 3.0) × 107m/s, respectively, while the largest velocities were (9.2, 12.2, 11.5, 12.0) × 107m/s, respectively. These data support earlier hypotheses that it is the classic IB pulses during initial leader of normal negative CG flashes that change the nonconductive air into an ionized path that is sufficiently long and conductive to start the stepped leader.
