skip to main content


Title: Differentially Private Clustering via Maximum Coverage
This paper studies the problem of clustering in metric spaces while preserving the privacy of individual data. Specifically, we examine differentially private variants of the k-medians and Euclidean k-means problems. We present polynomial algorithms with constant multiplicative error and lower additive error than the previous state-of-the-art for each problem. Additionally, our algorithms use a clustering algorithm without differential privacy as a black-box. This allows practitioners to control the trade-off between runtime and approximation factor by choosing a suitable clustering algorithm to use.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1750716
NSF-PAR ID:
10316110
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Volume:
35
Issue:
13
ISSN:
2159-5399
Page Range / eLocation ID:
11555 to 11563
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Given a data set of size n in d'-dimensional Euclidean space, the k-means problem asks for a set of k points (called centers) such that the sum of the l_2^2-distances between the data points and the set of centers is minimized. Previous work on this problem in the local differential privacy setting shows how to achieve multiplicative approximation factors arbitrarily close to optimal, but suffers high additive error. The additive error has also been seen to be an issue in implementations of differentially private k-means clustering algorithms in both the central and local settings. In this work, we introduce a new locally private k-means clustering algorithm that achieves near-optimal additive error whilst retaining constant multiplicative approximation factors and round complexity. Concretely, given any c>sqrt(2), our algorithm achieves O(k^(1 + O(1/(2c^2-1))) * sqrt(d' n) * log d' * poly log n) additive error with an O(c^2) multiplicative approximation factor. 
    more » « less
  2. We introduce a new (ϵₚ, δₚ)-differentially private algorithm for the k-means clustering problem. Given a dataset in Euclidean space, the k-means clustering problem requires one to find k points in that space such that the sum of squares of Euclidean distances between each data point and its closest respective point among the k returned is minimised. Although there exist privacy-preserving methods with good theoretical guarantees to solve this problem, in practice it is seen that it is the additive error which dictates the practical performance of these methods. By reducing the problem to a sequence of instances of maximum coverage on a grid, we are able to derive a new method that achieves lower additive error than previous works. For input datasets with cardinality n and diameter Δ, our algorithm has an O(Δ² (k log² n log(1/δₚ)/ϵₚ + k √(d log(1/δₚ))/ϵₚ)) additive error whilst maintaining constant multiplicative error. We conclude with some experiments and find an improvement over previously implemented work for this problem. 
    more » « less
  3. We consider the problem of clustering data sets in the presence of arbitrary outliers. Traditional clustering algorithms such as k-means and spectral clustering are known to perform poorly for data sets contaminated with even a small number of outliers. In this paper, we develop a provably robust spectral clustering algorithm that applies a simple rounding scheme to denoise a Gaussian kernel matrix built from the data points and uses vanilla spectral clustering to recover the cluster labels of data points. We analyze the performance of our algorithm under the assumption that the “good” data points are generated from a mixture of sub-Gaussians (we term these “inliers”), whereas the outlier points can come from any arbitrary probability distribution. For this general class of models, we show that the misclassification error decays at an exponential rate in the signal-to-noise ratio, provided the number of outliers is a small fraction of the inlier points. Surprisingly, this derived error bound matches with the best-known bound for semidefinite programs (SDPs) under the same setting without outliers. We conduct extensive experiments on a variety of simulated and real-world data sets to demonstrate that our algorithm is less sensitive to outliers compared with other state-of-the-art algorithms proposed in the literature. Funding: G. A. Hanasusanto was supported by the National Science Foundation Grants NSF ECCS-1752125 and NSF CCF-2153606. P. Sarkar gratefully acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation Grants NSF DMS-1713082, NSF HDR-1934932 and NSF 2019844. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2317 . 
    more » « less
  4. We study the A-optimal design problem where we are given vectors υ1, …, υn ∊ ℝd, an integer k ≥ d, and the goal is to select a set S of k vectors that minimizes the trace of (∑i∊Svivi⊺)−1. Traditionally, the problem is an instance of optimal design of experiments in statistics [35] where each vector corresponds to a linear measurement of an unknown vector and the goal is to pick k of them that minimize the average variance of the error in the maximum likelihood estimate of the vector being measured. The problem also finds applications in sensor placement in wireless networks [22], sparse least squares regression [8], feature selection for k-means clustering [9], and matrix approximation [13, 14, 5]. In this paper, we introduce proportional volume sampling to obtain improved approximation algorithms for A-optimal design. Given a matrix, proportional volume sampling involves picking a set of columns S of size k with probability proportional to µ(S) times det(∑i∊Svivi⊺) for some measure µ. Our main result is to show the approximability of the A-optimal design problem can be reduced to approximate independence properties of the measure µ. We appeal to hardcore distributions as candidate distributions µ that allow us to obtain improved approximation algorithms for the A-optimal design. Our results include a d-approximation when k = d, an (1 + ∊)-approximation when and -approximation when repetitions of vectors are allowed in the solution. We also consider generalization of the problem for k ≤ d and obtain a k-approximation. We also show that the proportional volume sampling algorithm gives approximation algorithms for other optimal design objectives (such as D-optimal design [36] and generalized ratio objective [27]) matching or improving previous best known results. Interestingly, we show that a similar guarantee cannot be obtained for the E-optimal design problem. We also show that the A-optimal design problem is NP-hard to approximate within a fixed constant when k = d. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    As neuroimaging data increase in complexity and related analytical problems follow suite, more researchers are drawn to collaborative frameworks that leverage data sets from multiple data‐collection sites to balance out the complexity with an increased sample size. Although centralized data‐collection approaches have dominated the collaborative scene, a number of decentralized approaches—those that avoid gathering data at a shared central store—have grown in popularity. We expect the prevalence of decentralized approaches to continue as privacy risks and communication overhead become increasingly important for researchers. In this article, we develop, implement and evaluate a decentralized version of one such widely used tool: dynamic functional network connectivity. Our resulting algorithm, decentralized dynamic functional network connectivity (ddFNC), synthesizes a new, decentralized group independent component analysis algorithm (dgICA) with algorithms for decentralizedk‐means clustering. We compare both individual decentralized components and the full resulting decentralized analysis pipeline against centralized counterparts on the same data, and show that both provide comparable performance. Additionally, we perform several experiments which evaluate the communication overhead and convergence behavior of various decentralization strategies and decentralized clustering algorithms. Our analysis indicates that ddFNC is a fine candidate for facilitating decentralized collaboration between neuroimaging researchers, and stands ready for the inclusion of privacy‐enabling modifications, such as differential privacy.

     
    more » « less