skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Time scales of the Greenland Freshwater Anomaly in the Subpolar North Atlantic
Abstract The impact of increasing Greenland freshwater discharge on the subpolar North Atlantic (SPNA) remains unknown as there are uncertainties associated with the time scales of the Greenland freshwater anomaly (GFWA) in the SPNA. Results from numerical simulations tracking GFWA and an analytical approach are employed to estimate the response time suggesting a decadal time scale (13 years) required for the SPNA to adjust for increasing GFWA. Analytical solutions obtained for a long-lasting increase of freshwater discharge show a non-steady state response of the SPNA with increasing content of the GFWA. In contrast, solutions for a short-lived pulse of freshwater demonstrate different responses of the SPNA with a rapid increase of freshwater in the domain followed by an exponential decay after the pulse has passed. Derived theoretical relation between time scales show that residence time scales are time-dependent for a non-steady state case and asymptote the response time scale with time. Residence time of the GFWA deduced from Lagrangian experiments is close to and smaller than the response time, in agreement with the theory. The Lagrangian analysis shows dependence of the residence time on the entrance route of the GFWA and on the depth. The fraction of the GFWA exported through Davis Strait has limited impact on the interior basins, whereas the fraction entering the SPNA from the southwest Greenland shelf spreads into the interior regions. In both cases, the residence time of the GFWA increases with depth demonstrating long persistence of the freshwater anomaly in the subsurface layers.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1845877
PAR ID:
10316478
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Climate
ISSN:
0894-8755
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. null (Ed.)
    Abstract A unique feature of small mountainous rivers is that discharge can be elevated by an order of magnitude during a large rain event. The impact of time-varying discharge on freshwater transport pathways and alongshore propagation rates in the coastal ocean is not well understood. A suite of simulations in an idealized coastal ocean domain using the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) with varying steady background discharge conditions (25–100 m 3 s −1 ), pulse amplitude (200–800 m 3 s −1 ), pulse duration (1–6 days), and steady downwelling-favorable winds (0–4 m s −1 ) are compared to investigate the downstream freshwater transport along the coast (in the direction of Kelvin wave propagation) following a discharge pulse from the river. The nose of the pulse propagates rapidly alongshore at 0.04–0.32 m s −1 (faster propagation corresponds with larger pulse volume and faster winds) transporting 13%–66% of the discharge. The remainder of the discharge volume initially accumulates in the bulge near the river mouth, with lower retention for longer pulse duration and stronger winds. Following the pulse, the bulge eddy disconnects from the river mouth and is advected downstream at 0–0.1 m s −1 , equal to the depth-averaged wind-driven ambient water velocity. As it transits alongshore, it sheds freshwater volume farther downstream and the alongshore freshwater transport stays elevated between the nose and the transient bulge eddy. The evolution of freshwater transport at a plume cross section can be described by the background discharge, the passage of the pulse nose, and a slow exponential return to background conditions. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract We use an idealized numerical model to investigate the dynamics and fate of a small river discharging into the surf zone. Our study reveals that the plume reaches a steady state, at which point the combined advective and diffusive freshwater fluxes from the surf zone to the inner shelf balance the river discharge. At a steady state, the surf zone is well mixed vertically due to wave-enhanced vertical turbulent diffusion and has a strong cross-shore salinity gradient. The horizontal gradient drives a cross-shore buoyancy-driven circulation, directed offshore at the surface and onshore near the bottom, which opposes the wave-driven circulation. Using a scaling analysis based on momentum and freshwater budgets, we determine that the steady-state alongshore plume extent (Lp) and the fraction of river water trapped in the surf zone depend on the ratio of the near-field plume length to the surf-zone width (Lnf/Lsz) across a wide range of discharge and wave conditions and a limited set of tidal conditions. This scaling also allows us to predict the residence time and freshwater fraction (or dilution ratio) in the steady-state plume within the surf zone, which ranges from approximately 0.1 to 10 days and from 0.1 to 0.3, respectively. Our findings establish the basic dynamics and scales of an idealized plume in the surf zone, as well as estimates of residence times and dilution rates that may provide guidance to coastal managers. Significance StatementSmall rivers and estuaries often carry pollutants, sediments, and larvae into the coastal ocean, where wave action in the surf zone can trap them near the shore. This process can play an important role in the flux of material into and out of the nearshore ecosystem and presents a potential risk to swimmers when materials are harmful. The present study uses a numerical model to investigate the fate of freshwater discharged from small rivers into the surf zone and the processes through which trapped riverine freshwater escapes from the surf zone. These results establish a basis for predicting the fate of river-borne materials from coastal rivers and understanding the exchange between the surf zone and the inner shelf. Additionally, this work provides a theoretical framework for predicting the residence time and concentration of river-borne material trapped in the surf zone. 
    more » « less
  3. We use an idealized numerical model to investigate the dynamics and fate of a small river discharging into the surf zone. Our study reveals that the plume reaches a steady state, at which point the combined advective and diffusive freshwater fluxes from the surf zone to the inner shelf balance the river discharge. At a steady state, the surf zone is well-mixed vertically due to wave-enhanced vertical turbulent diffusion and has a strong cross-shore salinity gradient. The horizontal gradient drives a cross-shore buoyancy-driven circulation, directed offshore at the surface and onshore near the bottom, which opposes the wave-driven circulation. Using a scaling analysis based on momentum and freshwater budgets, we determine that the steady-state alongshore plume extent (Lp) and the fraction of river water trapped in the surf zone depend on the ratio of the near-field plume length to the surf zone width (Lnf/Lsz) across a wide range of discharge and wave conditions, and a limited set of tidal conditions. This scaling also allows us to predict the residence time and freshwater fraction (or dilution ratio) in the steady-state plume within the surf zone, which range from approximately 0.1 to 10 days and 0.1 to 0.3, respectively. Our findings establish the basic dynamics and scales of an idealized plume in the surf zone, as well as estimates of residence times and dilution rates that may provide guidance to coastal managers. # Data from: Dynamics and scaling of a small river discharging into the surf zone [https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2280gb608](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2280gb608) The present dataset includes the [COAWST model](https://www.usgs.gov/centers/whcmsc/science/coawst-a-coupled-ocean-atmosphere-wave-sediment-transport-modeling-system) outputs used to describe the dynamics and scaling of a small river discharging into the surf zone. ## File structure The data are structured as follows: 1. plume_scale.mat - Data of plume scales of all the cases, where * Hs: significant wave height [m] * Q: river discharge [m^3 s^-1] * L_nf: near-field plume length [m] * L_p: alongshore plume extent [m] * h_sz: water depth at the surf zone edge [m] * x_sz: surf zone width [m] * S_in: inflow salinity [PSU] * g_p: reduced gravity at the river mouth [m s^-2] * g_p*_*0: reduced gravity at the river mouth calculated using the density difference between river inflow and ambient ocean water [m s^-2] * Eta_0: water surface elevation anomaly at the river mouth [m] * V_sz: total volume of freshwater trapped in the surf zone [m^3] * T: the time required for the plume to reach a steady state [day] * L_t: plume turning distance [m] * S_bar: averaged salinity in the plume [PSU] 2. DepthAveraged.mat - Depth-averaged flow fields. DepthAveraged_BaseCase.mat, DepthAveraged_Case1.mat, DepthAveraged_Case3.mat, DepthAveraged_Case4.mat, DepthAveraged_Case6.mat, DepthAveraged_Case7.mat, DepthAveraged_Case8.mat, DepthAveraged_Case9.mat, DepthAveraged_Case16.mat, DepthAveraged_Case17.mat, DepthAveraged_Case18.mat, DepthAveraged_Case19.mat includes the results of the base case, cases 1, 3, 4, 6-9, and 16-19, respectively. In these files: * Wetdry_mask: wet/dry mask on RHO-points [binary] * Wetdry_mask_u: wet/dry mask on U-points [binary] * Wetdry_mask_v: wet/dry mask on V-points [binary] * Z: free-surface [m] * S: surface salinity [PSU] * Hs: significant wave height [m] * U: vertically integrated u-momentum component [m s^-1] * U_st: vertically-integrated u-Stokes drift velocity [m s^-1] * V: vertically integrated v-momentum component [m s^-1] * V_st: vertically-integrated v-Stokes drift velocity [m s^-1] 3. FullField_BaseCase.mat - 3D flow fields for the base case, where * Z: free-surface [m] * S: salinity [PSU] * Hs: significant wave height [m] * Lw: mean wavelength [m] * U: u-momentum component [m s^-1] * U_st: u-Stokes drift velocity [m s^-1] * V: v-momentum component [m s^-1] * V_st: v-Stokes drift velocity [m s^-1] * W: w-momentum component [m s^-1] * W_st: w-Stokes drift velocity [m s^-1] * Aks: salinity vertical diffusion coefficient [m^2 s^-1] * Akv: vertical viscosity coefficient [m^2 s^-1] * Cs_r: S-coordinate stretching curves at RHO-points [-] * Cs_w: S-coordinate stretching curves at W-points [-] 4. FreshwaterTrace_BaseCase.mat - Time series of freshwater volume and fluxes for the base case, where * i_sz: XI-index of the location of the surf zone edge [-] * i_shore: XI-index of the location of the shoreline [-] * Vsz: volume of freshwater in the plume in the surf zone [m^3] * Vis: volume of freshwater in the plume in the inner shelf [m^3] * Vsz_total: total volume of freshwater in the surf zone [m^3] * Vis_total: total volume of freshwater in the inner shelf [m^3] * R2SZ_flux: freshwater flux discharging into the surf zone [m^3 s^-1] * Vchannel: volume of freshwater in the plume in the river channel [m^3] * Vchannel_total: volume of freshwater in the river channel [m^3] * SBoundary_flux_SZ: the freshwater fluxes through the southern domain boundaries of the surf zone [m^3 s^-1] * SBoundary_flux_IS: the freshwater fluxes through the southern domain boundaries of the inner shelf [m^3 s^-1] * NBoundary_flux_SZ: the freshwater fluxes through the northern domain boundaries of the surf zone [m^3 s^-1] * NBoundary_flux_IS: the freshwater fluxes through the northern domain boundaries of the inner shelf [m^3 s^-1] * WBoundary_flux: the freshwater fluxes through the westhern domain boundary [m^3 s^-1] 5. DepthAveraged_XDiagnostic.mat - Depth-averaged diagnostic output of cross-shore momentum terms. DepthAveraged_XDiagnostic_BaseCase.mat includes the results of the base case at the steady state, and DepthAveraged_XDiagnostic_0day_1mWave.mat includes those at the start of river flow. In these files: * ubar_xadv: time-averaged 2D u-momentum, horizontal XI-advection term [m s^-2] * ubar_yadv: time-averaged 2D u-momentum, horizontal ETA-advection term [m s^-2] * ubar_xvisc: time-averaged 2D u-momentum, horizontal XI-viscosity term [m s^-2] * ubar_yvisc: time-averaged 2D u-momentum, horizontal ETA-viscosity term [m s^-2] * ubar_prsgrd: time-averaged 2D u-momentum, pressure gradient term [m s^-2] * ubar_zqsp: time-averaged 2D u-momentum, quasi-static pressure [m s^-2] * ubar_zbeh: time-averaged 2D u-momentum, Bernoulli head [m s^-2] * ubar_bstr: time-averaged 2D u-momentum, bottom stress term [m s^-2] * ubar_wbrk: time-averaged 2D u-momentum, wave breaking term [m s^-2] 6. DepthAveraged_YDiagnostic_BaseCase.mat - Depth-averaged diagnostic output of alongshore momentum terms, where * vbar_xadv: time-averaged 2D v-momentum, horizontal XI-advection term [m s^-2] * vbar_yadv: time-averaged 2D v-momentum, horizontal ETA-advection term [m s^-2] * vbar_xvisc: time-averaged 2D v-momentum, horizontal XI-viscosity term [m s^-2] * vbar_yvisc: time-averaged 2D v-momentum, horizontal ETA-viscosity term [m s^-2] * vbar_prsgrd: time-averaged 2D v-momentum, pressure gradient term [m s^-2] * vbar_zqsp: time-averaged 2D v-momentum, quasi-static pressure [m s^-2] * vbar_zbeh: time-averaged 2D v-momentum, Bernoulli head [m s^-2] * vbar_bstr: time-averaged 2D v-momentum, bottom stress term [m s^-2] * vbar_wbrk: time-averaged 2D v-momentum, wave breaking term [m s^-2] 7. grid.zip - Model grid file. * This grid file is designed for use with [ROMS](https://www.myroms.org/index.php), the hydrodynamic module of the COAWST modeling system. A diagram illustrating how the variables are placed on the grid and where the boundaries lie relative to the grid is available on [WikiROMS](https://www.myroms.org/wiki/Grid_Generation). * This grid file is in NetCDF format, which can be opened and used by a wide range of application software such as MATLAB, Python, and Panoply. For more detailed information, please refer to its [official website](https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/). ## Code/Software All the post-processing scripts and data are prepared by MATLAB. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Freshwater from the Greenland Ice Sheet is routed to the ocean through narrow fjords along the coastline where it impacts ecosystems both within the fjord and on the continental shelf, regional circulation, and potentially the global overturning circulation. However, the timing of freshwater export is sensitive to the residence time of waters within glacial fjords. Here, we present evidence of seasonal freshwater storage in a tidewater glacial fjord using hydrographic and velocity data collected over 10 days during the summers of 2012 and 2013 in Saqqarleq (SQ), a midsize fjord in west Greenland. The data revealed a rapid freshening trend of −0.05 ± 0.01 and −0.04 ± 0.01 g kg −1 day −1 in 2012 and 2013, respectively, within the intermediate layer of the fjord (15–100 m) less than 2.5 km from the glacier terminus. The freshening trend is driven, in part, by the downward mixing of outflowing glacially modified water near the surface and increasingly stratifies the fjord from the surface downward over the summer melt season. We construct a box model that recreates the first-order dynamics of the fjord and describes freshwater storage as a balance between friction and density-driven exchange outside the fjord. The model can be used to diagnose the time scale for this balance to be reached, and for SQ we find a month lag between subglacial meltwater discharge and net freshwater export. These results indicate a fjord-induced delay in freshwater export to the ocean that should be represented in large-scale models seeking to understand the impact of Greenland freshwater on the regional climate system. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract The Greenland Ice Sheet is losing mass at an accelerating pace, increasing its contribution to the freshwater input into the Nordic Seas and the subpolar North Atlantic. It has been proposed that this increased freshwater may impact the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation by affecting the stratification of the convective regions of the North Atlantic and Nordic Seas. Observations of the transformation and pathways of meltwater from the Greenland Ice Sheet on the continental shelf and in the gyre interior, however, are lacking. Here, we report on noble gas derived observations of submarine meltwater distribution and transports in the East and West Greenland Current Systems of southern Greenland and around Cape Farewell. In southeast Greenland, submarine meltwater is concentrated in the East Greenland Coastal Current core with maximum concentrations of 0.8%, thus significantly diluted relative to fjord observations. It is found in water with density ranges from 1,024 to 1027.2 kg m−3and salinity from 30.6 to 34, which extends as deep as 250 m and as far offshore as 60 km on the Greenland shelf. Submarine meltwater transport on the shelf averages 5.0 ± 1.6 mSv which, if representative of the mean annual transport, represents 60%–80% of the total solid ice discharge from East Greenland and suggests relatively little offshore export of meltwater east and upstream of Cape Farewell. The location of the meltwater transport maximum shifts toward the shelfbreak around Cape Farewell, positioning the meltwater for offshore flux in regions of known cross‐shelf exchange along the West Greenland coast. 
    more » « less