More Like this

1. Phase Diversity in Ptychographic Reconstructions with a Programmable Phase Plate

   https://doi.org/10.1093/micmic/ozad067.137  

   Ribet, Stephanie M; Zeltmann, Steven E; Varnavides, Georgios; dos_Reis, Roberto; Dravid, Vinayak P; Ophus, Colin (July 2023, Microscopy and Microanalysis)
2. Critical phase induced by Berry phase and dissipation in a spin chain

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043270  

   Martin, Simon; Grover, Tarun (December 2023, Physical Review Research)
3. Phase reduction and phase-based optimal control for biological systems: a tutorial

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-018-0780-z  

   Monga, Bharat; Wilson, Dan; Matchen, Tim; Moehlis, Jeff (April 2019, Biological Cybernetics)
4. Effects of the inert phase on solidification near a triple-phase line

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2023.127438  

   Bagheri-Sadeghi, Nojan; Helenbrook, Brian T (January 2024, Journal of Crystal Growth)

   The local temperature solution near the triple-phase line of a solidifying front, its melt, and a surrounding inert phase was obtained analytically including all three phases and solidification kinetics. This analytical solution was validated using a three-phase numerical model of the horizontal ribbon growth of silicon and compared to a two-phase analysis that models the effect of the third phase (e.g. the gas) as an applied heat flux. Although the three-phase solutions have additional modes to represent the gas behavior, for many conditions the two-phase and three-phase models predicted consistent behaviors. However, introduction of a non-zero growth angle causes the gas phase heat fluxes to have strong gradients near the triple-phase line. Even with zero growth angle, there are conditions in which the two-phase and three-phase solutions are very different; one predicting infinite heat fluxes while the other predicts finite fluxes. This depended on the ratios of thermal conductivities, and the angle at which the solid-melt interface intersected the free surface. In particular, when the thermal conductivity of the inert phase was comparable to the melt or solid phases there were significant differences. 

   more » « less
5. Dynamic quantitative phase microscopy: a single-shot approach using geometric phase interferometry

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01750-2  

   Espinosa-Momox, Ana; Norton, Brandon; Serrano-García, David_I; Porras-Aguilar, Rosario (July 2024, Communications Physics)

   Abstract There is a significant gap in cost-effective quantitative phase microscopy (QPM) systems for studying dynamic cellular processes while maintaining accuracy for long-term cellular monitoring. Current QPM systems often rely on complex and expensive voltage-controllable components like Spatial Light Modulators or two-beam interferometry. To address this, we introduce a QPM system optimized for time-varying phase samples using azobenzene liquid crystal as a Zernike filter with a polarization-sensing camera. This system operates without input voltage or moving components, reducing complexity and cost. Optimized for gentle illumination to minimize phototoxicity, it achieves a 1 Hz frame rate for prolonged monitoring. The system demonstrated accuracy with a maximum standard deviation of ±42 nm and low noise fluctuations of ±2.5 nm. Designed for simplicity and single-shot operations, our QPM system is efficient, robust, and precisely calibrated for reliable measurements. Using inexpensive optical components, it offers an economical solution for long-term, noninvasive biological monitoring and research applications. 

   more » « less