<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Discovery of a Double-detonation Thermonuclear Supernova Progenitor</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher></publisher>
				<date>01/27/2022</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10321887</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.3847/2041-8213/ac48f1</idno>
					<title level='j'>The Astrophysical Journal Letters</title>
<idno>2041-8205</idno>
<biblScope unit="volume">925</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>					

					<author>Thomas Kupfer</author><author>Evan B. Bauer</author><author>Jan van Roestel</author><author>Eric C. Bellm</author><author>Lars Bildsten</author><author>Jim Fuller</author><author>Thomas A. Prince</author><author>Ulrich Heber</author><author>Stephan Geier</author><author>Matthew J. Green</author><author>Shrinivas R. Kulkarni</author><author>Steven Bloemen</author><author>Russ R. Laher</author><author>Ben Rusholme</author><author>David Schneider</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[Abstract                          We present the discovery of a new double-detonation progenitor system consisting of a hot subdwarf B (sdB) binary with a white dwarf companion with a              P              orb              = 76.34179(2) minutes orbital period. Spectroscopic observations are consistent with an sdB star during helium core burning residing on the extreme horizontal branch. Chimera light curves are dominated by ellipsoidal deformation of the sdB star and a weak eclipse of the companion white dwarf. Combining spectroscopic and light curve fits, we find a low-mass sdB star,              M              sdB              = 0.383 ± 0.028              M              ⊙              with a massive white dwarf companion,              M              WD              = 0.725 ± 0.026              M              ⊙              . From the eclipses we find a blackbody temperature for the white dwarf of 26,800 K resulting in a cooling age of ≈25 Myr whereas our              MESA              model predicts an sdB age of ≈170 Myr. We conclude that the sdB formed first through stable mass transfer followed by a common envelope which led to the formation of the white dwarf companion ≈25 Myr ago. Using the              MESA              stellar evolutionary code we find that the sdB star will start mass transfer in ≈6 Myr and in ≈60 Myr the white dwarf will reach a total mass of 0.92              M              ⊙              with a thick helium layer of 0.17              M              ⊙              . This will lead to a detonation that will likely destroy the white dwarf in a peculiar thermonuclear supernova. PTF1 J2238+7430 is only the second confirmed candidate for a double-detonation thermonuclear supernova. Using both systems we estimate that at least ≈1% of white dwarf thermonuclear supernovae originate from sdB+WD binaries with thick helium layers, consistent with the small number of observed peculiar thermonuclear explosions.]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="1.">Introduction</head><p>Most hot subdwarf B stars (sdBs) are core-helium-burning stars with masses around 0.5 M e and thin hydrogen envelopes <ref type="bibr">(Heber 1986</ref><ref type="bibr">(Heber , 2009</ref><ref type="bibr">(Heber , 2016))</ref>. A large number of sdB stars are in close orbits with orbital periods of P orb &lt; 10 days <ref type="bibr">(Maxted et al. 2001;</ref><ref type="bibr">Napiwotzki et al. 2004)</ref>, with the most compact systems reaching orbital periods of &#61576;1 hr (e.g., <ref type="bibr">Vennes et</ref> al. 2012; Geier et al. 2013; Kupfer et al. <ref type="bibr">2017a, 2017b, 2020a, 2020b)</ref>. The only way to form such tight binaries is orbital shrinkage through a common-envelope phase followed by the loss of angular momentum due to the radiation of gravitational waves <ref type="bibr">(Han et al. 2002</ref><ref type="bibr">(Han et al. , 2003;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Nelemans 2010</ref>).</p><p>SdB binaries with white dwarf (WD) companions which exit the common-envelope phase at P orb &#61576; 2 hr will reach contact while the sdB is still burning helium <ref type="bibr">(Bauer &amp; Kupfer 2021)</ref>. Due to the emission of gravitational waves the orbit of the binary will shrink until the sdB fills its Roche Lobe at a period of &#8776;30-100 minutes, depending on the evolutionary stage and envelope thickness of the hot subdwarf (e.g., <ref type="bibr">Savonije et al. 1986;</ref><ref type="bibr">Tutukov &amp; Fedorova 1989;</ref><ref type="bibr">Tutukov &amp; Yungelson 1990;</ref><ref type="bibr">Iben &amp; Tutukov 1991;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yungelson 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Piersanti et al. 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Brooks et al. 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Neunteufel et al. 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bauer &amp; Kupfer 2021)</ref>.</p><p>The known population of sdB + WD binaries consists mostly of systems with orbital periods too large to start accretion before the sdB turns into a WD <ref type="bibr">(Kupfer et al. 2015)</ref>. Currently only four detached systems with a WD companion are known to have P orb &lt; 2 hr <ref type="bibr">(Vennes et al. 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Geier et al. 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kupfer et al. 2017a</ref><ref type="bibr">Kupfer et al. , 2017b;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Pelisoli et al. 2021)</ref>. Just recently, <ref type="bibr">Kupfer et al. (2020a</ref><ref type="bibr">Kupfer et al. ( , 2020b) )</ref> discovered the first two Roche-lobe-filling hot subdwarfs as part of a high-cadence Galactic Plane survey using the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF; <ref type="bibr">Kupfer et al. 2021)</ref>. Both systems can be best explained as Roche-lobe-filling sdOB stars that have started mass transfer to a WD companion. The light curves in both systems show deep eclipses from an accretion disk. Due to their high effective temperatures, both sdOB stars are predicted to be in a shortlived phase where the sdOB undergoes residual hydrogen shell burning.</p><p>The most compact known sdB binary where the sdB is still undergoing core-helium burning is CD-30&#176;11223. The binary has an orbital period P orb = 70.5 minutes and a high-mass WD companion (M WD &#8776; 0.75 M e ; <ref type="bibr">Vennes et al. 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Geier et al. 2013)</ref>. The sdB in CD-30&#176;11223 will begin transferring helium to its WD companion in &#8776;40 Myr when the system has shrunk to an orbital period P orb &#8776; 40 minutes. After the WD accretes &#8776;0.1 M e , helium burning is predicted to be ignited unstably in the accreted helium layer on the WD surface <ref type="bibr">(Brooks et al. 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bauer et al. 2017)</ref>. This could either disrupt the WD even when the mass is significantly below the Chandrasekhar mass, which is called a double-detonation supernova (e.g., <ref type="bibr">Livne 1990;</ref><ref type="bibr">Livne &amp; Arnett 1995;</ref><ref type="bibr">Fink et al. 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Woosley &amp; Kasen 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wang &amp; Han 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Shen &amp; Bildsten 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wang 2018)</ref>, or just detonate the He shell without disrupting the WD, which results in a faint and fast .Ia supernova with subsequent weaker He flashes <ref type="bibr">(Bildsten et al. 2007;</ref><ref type="bibr">Brooks et al. 2015)</ref>. Therefore, systems like CD-30&#176;11223 are predicted to be either the progenitors for double-detonation thermonuclear supernovae or perhaps faint and fast .Ia supernovae that do not disrupt the WD. <ref type="bibr">De et al. (2019</ref><ref type="bibr">De et al. ( , 2020) )</ref> presented the discovery of a sample of calcium-rich transients consistent with a thick helium-shell double detonation on a sub-Chandrasekhar-mass WD <ref type="bibr">(Polin et al. 2019</ref><ref type="bibr">(Polin et al. , 2021))</ref>. The majority of these transients are located in old stellar populations with only a small subsample found in star-forming environments.</p><p>The question of just how common systems like CD-30&#176;1 1223 are remains to be answered. To address this question, we have conducted a search for (ultra-)compact post-commonenvelope systems using the Palomar Transient Factory (PTF; <ref type="bibr">Law et al. 2009;</ref><ref type="bibr">Rau et al. 2009</ref>) and subsequently, the ZTF <ref type="bibr">(Graham et al. 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Masci et al. 2019</ref>) based on a colorselected sample from Pan-STARRS data release 1. The PTF used the Palomar 48&#8243; Samuel Oschin Schmidt telescope to image up to &#8776;2000 deg 2 of the sky per night to a depth of R mould &#8776; 20.6 mag or &#162; &#187; g 21.3 mag. PTF was succeeded by the ZTF which started science operations in 2018 March, using the same telescope but a new camera with a field of view of 47 deg 2 . Here we report the discovery of a new thermonuclear supernova double-detonation progenitor system consisting of an sdB with a WD companion: PTF1 J223857.11+743015.1 (hereafter PTF1 J2238+7430) with an orbital period of 76 minutes showing properties similar to CD-30&#176;11223.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.">Observations</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.1.">Photometry</head><p>As part of the PTF, the Palomar 48 inch (P48) telescope imaged the sky every night. The reduction pipeline for PTF applies standard de-biasing, flat fielding, and astrometric calibration to raw images <ref type="bibr">(Laher et al. 2014)</ref>. Relative photometry correction is applied and absolute photometric calibration to the few percent level is performed using a fit to SDSS fields observed in the same night <ref type="bibr">(Ofek et al. 2012)</ref>. The light curve of PTF1 J2238+7430 has 144 epochs, with good photometry in the R mould band with a typical uncertainty of 0.01-0.02 mag. The majority of observations were conducted during the summer months, June-August 2013 and 2014, and the cadence is highly irregular, ranging from a few minutes to years. The object was also observed as part of the ZTF public survey <ref type="bibr">(Bellm et al. 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Graham et al. 2019)</ref>. Image processing of ZTF data is described in full detail in <ref type="bibr">Masci et al. (2019)</ref>. We extracted the light curve from ZTF data release 6 which consists of 34 observations in ZTF-r taken randomly over &#8776;1.5 yr between 2018 August and 2019 November.</p><p>High-cadence observations were conducted using the Palomar 200 inch telescope with the high-speed photometer CHIMERA <ref type="bibr">(Harding et al. 2016)</ref> which is a two-band photometer that uses frame-transfer, electron-multiplying CCDs to achieve 15 ms dead time covering a 5&#8242; &#215; 5&#8242; field of view. Simultaneous optical imaging in two bands is enabled by a dichroic beam splitter centered at 567 nm. Data reduction was carried out with the ULTRACAM pipeline <ref type="bibr">(Dhillon et al. 2007</ref>) customized for CHIMERA. All frames were bias-subtracted and flat-fielded. 1300 observations in &#162; g and &#162; r with a 5 s exposure time were obtained on 2017 July 26 and 2700 observations in &#162; g and &#162; i with a 4 s exposure time were obtained on 2017 December 14.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.2.">Spectroscopy</head><p>Optical spectra were obtained with the Palomar 200 inch telescope and the Double-Beam Spectrograph (DBSP; Oke &amp; Gunn 1982) using a low-resolution mode (R &#8764; 1500). Thirtyone consecutive exposures were obtained on 2017 May 25 and 2017 May 29, and 15 consecutive exposures were obtained on 2017 May 25 using a 180 s exposure time. Each night an average bias and normalized flat-field frame was made out of 10 individual bias and 10 individual lamp flat fields. To account for telescope flexure, an arc lamp was taken at the position of the target after each observing sequence. For the blue arm, FeAr, and for the red arm, HeNeAr arc exposures were taken. Both arms of the spectrograph were reduced using a custom PyRAF-based pipeline<ref type="foot">foot_0</ref>  <ref type="bibr">(Bellm &amp; Sesar 2016)</ref>. The pipeline performs standard image processing and spectral reduction procedures, including bias subtraction, flat-field correction, wavelength calibration, optimal spectral extraction, and flux calibration.</p><p>Additionally PTF1 J2238+7430 was also observed with the William Herschel Telescope (WHT) and the ISIS spectrograph <ref type="bibr">(Carter et al. 1993</ref>) using a medium-resolution mode (R600B grating, R &#8776; 2500). Ten consecutive exposures with an exposure time of 180 s were obtained on 2017 July 26. Ten bias frames were obtained to construct an average bias frame and 10 individual lamp flat fields were obtained to construct a normalized flat field. CuNeAr arc exposures were taken before and after the observing sequence to correct for instrumental flexure. One-dimensional spectra were extracted using optimal extraction and were subsequently wavelength and flux calibrated.</p><p>To obtain high-resolution spectra, PTF1 J2238+7430 was observed with Keck/HIRES and Keck/ESI. We obtained 5 consecutive exposures with Keck/HIRES on 2017 August 14 and 2017 August 30 as well as 14 consecutive exposures with Keck/ESI on 2018 July 20. ThAr arc exposures were taken at the beginning of the night. The spectra were reduced using the MAKEE<ref type="foot">foot_1</ref> pipeline following the standard procedure: bias subtraction, flat fielding, sky subtraction, order extraction, and wavelength calibration.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.">Orbital and Atmospheric Parameters and Light Curve Fitting</head><p>As evident in Figure <ref type="figure">1</ref> PTF1 J2238+7430 shows strong periodic ellipsoidal variability in its light curve at P orb = 76.341750(1) minutes. This variability is caused by the tidal deformation of the sdB primary under the influence of the gravitational force of the companion. We use the PTF and the ZTF light curve with its multi-year baseline and the Chimera light curves to derive the orbital period of the systems. The analysis was done with the Gatspy module for timeseries analysis which uses the Lomb-Scargle periodogram<ref type="foot">foot_3</ref> (VanderPlas &amp; Ivezi&#263; 2015). The error was derived from bootstrapping.</p><p>Radial velocities were measured by fitting Gaussians, Lorentzians, and polynomials to the hydrogen and helium lines to cover continuum, line, and line core of the individual lines using the FITSB2 routine <ref type="bibr">(Napiwotzki et al. 2004</ref>). The procedure is described in full detail in <ref type="bibr">Geier et al. (2011)</ref>. We fitted the wavelength shifts compared to the rest wavelengths using a &#967; 2 minimization. Assuming circular orbits, a sine curve was fitted to the folded radial-velocity (RV) data points (Figure <ref type="figure">1</ref>).</p><p>Atmospheric parameters such as effective temperature, T eff , surface gravity, g log , helium abundance, = y log log</p><p>, and projected rotational velocity, v i sin rot , were determined by fitting the rest-wavelength-corrected average DBSP, ISIS, and HIRES spectra with metal-line-blanketed LTE model spectra <ref type="bibr">(Heber et al. 2000)</ref>. T eff and g log were derived from the Balmer and helium lines from the ISIS and DBSP spectra whereas y log and v i sin rot were measured with the HIRES spectra. High-resolution echelle spectra are not well suited to measuring T eff and g log because the broad hydrogen absorption lines span several individual echelle orders and merging of the echelle spectra could introduce systematic errors. The full procedure is described in detail in <ref type="bibr">Kupfer et al. (2017a</ref><ref type="bibr">Kupfer et al. ( , 2017b))</ref>. PTF1 J2238+7430 shows typical T eff , g log , and y log and v i sin rot = 185 &#177; 5 km s -1 . The rotational velocity is consistent with a tidally locked sdOB star (see Section 4.1). Figure <ref type="figure">2</ref> shows the main Balmer and helium lines with the best fit to the data. Table <ref type="table">1</ref> summarizes the atmospheric and orbital parameters.</p><p>To model the light curves obtained with CHIMERA we used the LCURVE code <ref type="bibr">(Copperwheat et al. 2010)</ref>. We use a Roche geometry, and the free parameters in our fit are: the phase (t 0 ), the scaled radii (r 1,2 ), the mass ratio q, the inclination i, secondary temperature T WD , and the velocity scale</p><p>). We use a passband-dependent gravitydarkening law and use a gravity-darkening value (y g,r ) from <ref type="bibr">Claret &amp; Bloemen (2011)</ref> and find &#946; = 0.425 for &#162; g , &#946; = 0.395 for &#162; r , and &#946; = 0.37 for &#162; i . We assume an uncertainty of 0.03 on the value and use a Gaussian prior. We use fixed limbdarkening coefficients (a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , a 4 ) taken from <ref type="bibr">Claret &amp; Bloemen (2011)</ref>. We use a 1 = 0.82, a 2 -0.65, a 3 = 0.55, and a 4 -0.19 for &#162; g , a 1 = 0.81, a 2 = -0.89, a 3 = 0.79, and a 4 -0.27 for &#162; r , and a 1 = 0.78, a 2 -1.01, a 3 = 0.91, and a 4 -0.31 for &#162; i . We also model the relativistic beaming (F) as in <ref type="bibr">Bloemen et al. (2011)</ref>. We calculate the beaming parameters by assuming a blackbody spectrum and using the effective wavelength of the &#162; g , &#162; r , and &#162; i filters. We find F=1.80 for &#162; g , F=1.57 for &#162; r , and F=1.46 for &#162; i . The full approach is also described in <ref type="bibr">Kupfer et al. (2017a</ref><ref type="bibr">Kupfer et al. ( , 2017b</ref><ref type="bibr">Kupfer et al. ( , 2020a</ref><ref type="bibr">Kupfer et al. ( , 2020b) )</ref> and <ref type="bibr">Ratzloff et al. (2019)</ref>.</p><p>In addition, we add a second-order polynomial to correct for any long timescale trends that are the result of a changing airmass over the course of the observations. The best value of &#967; 2 for this model was 1350 for 1300 data points for the g-band light curve which also includes a weak eclipse of the hot WD. Although the eclipse is weak (1%; Figure <ref type="figure">3</ref>), the &#967; 2 for the noneclipsing solution is 1400 which is statistically significantly worse compared to the solution with the weak eclipse. We use the MCMC sampler EMCEE <ref type="bibr">(Foreman-Mackey et al. 2013</ref>) to determine the best-fit values and uncertainty on the parameters. Figure <ref type="figure">3</ref> shows the Chimera light curves with the best-fit model. The lower panels are zoomed in around the region when the WD is being eclipsed.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.">Results</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.1.">System Parameters</head><p>Although, PTF1 J2238+7430 is a single-lined binary we can derive system parameters using the combined results from the light curve analysis with results from the spectroscopic fitting. Parameters derived in this way by a simultaneous fit to the Chimera light curves are summarized in Table <ref type="table">1</ref>. The given errors are all 95% confidence limits.</p><p>We find that PTF1 J2238+7430 consists of a low-mass sdB with a high-mass WD companion. We derive a mass ratio q = M sdB /M WD = 0.528 &#177; 0.020, a mass for the sdB M sdB = 0.383 &#177; 0.028 M e , and a WD companion mass M WD = 0.725 &#177; 0.026 M e . PTF1 J2238+7430 is found to be eclipsing at an inclination angle of = &#61616; -+ i 88.4 3.3 1.6 which allows us to measure the radius and the blackbody temperature of the WD companion. We determine a blackbody temperature of 26,800 &#177; 4600 K for the WD and a radius of</p><p>0002 R e . The radius was found to be &lt;5% above the zero-temperature value and is fully consistent with predictions from <ref type="bibr">Romero et al. (2019)</ref> for carbon-oxygen-core white dwarfs. <ref type="bibr">Zahn (1977)</ref> predicted that the sdBs in close sdB binaries with orbital periods below &#8776;0.3 days should be synchronized to the orbit. More recently, <ref type="bibr">Preece et al. (2018)</ref> found that only the most compact sdB binaries should be synchronized. From the system parameters we find that the sdB would have a projected rotational velocity v i sin rot = 181 &#177; 6 km s -1 if synchronized to the orbit. The measured v i sin rot = 185 &#177; 5 km s -1 is consistent with a synchronized orbit.</p><p>We calculate the absolute magnitude (M g ) of PTF1 J2238 +7430 using the visual PanSTARRS g-band magnitude g = 15.244 &#177; 0.023 mag and the parallax from Gaia eDR3 <ref type="bibr">(Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016</ref><ref type="bibr">, 2021)</ref>. Because the object is located near the Galactic Plane, significant reddening can occur. <ref type="bibr">Green et al. (2019)</ref> present updated 3D extinction maps based on Gaia parallaxes and stellar photometry from Pan-STARRS 1 and 2MASS<ref type="foot">foot_4</ref> and find toward the direction of PTF1 J2238+7430 an extinction of E(gr) = 0.24 &#177; 0.03 at a distance of 1.00 kpc; this results in a total extinction in the gband of A g = 0.84 &#177; 0.11 mag, and with the corrected magnitude, we find an absolute magnitude of M g = 4.40 &#177; 0.20 mag consistent with a hot subdwarf star <ref type="bibr">(Geier et al. 2019)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.2.">Comparison with Gaia Parallax</head><p>To test whether our derived system parameters are consistent with the parallax provided by Gaia eDR3, we compared the measured parameters from the light curve fit to the predictions using the Gaia parallax. The approach follows a similar strategy as described in <ref type="bibr">Ratzloff et al. (2019)</ref> and <ref type="bibr">Kupfer et al. (2020b)</ref>. Using the absolute magnitude M g = 4.40 &#177; 0.20 mag, we find a luminosity of L = 11.5 &#177; 3.0 L e using a bolometric correction BC g = -2.30 mag derived for our stellar parameters from the MESA Isochrones &amp; Stellar Tracks (MIST; <ref type="bibr">Paxton et al. 2011</ref><ref type="bibr">Paxton et al. , 2013</ref><ref type="bibr">Paxton et al. , 2015</ref><ref type="bibr">Paxton et al. , 2018;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Choi et al. 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Dotter 2016)</ref> Using these equations we find M sdB = 0.39 &#177; 0.10 M e and R sdB = 0.17 &#177; 0.03 R e . Although the error bars are rather large, this result is in agreement with the results from the light curve and spectroscopic fits.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.3.">Kinematics of the Binary Systems</head><p>We find that PTF1 J2238+7430 has evolved from a &#8776;2 M e star (see Section 5.2), and we expect the system is a member of a young stellar population. Using the proper motion from Gaia eDR3 <ref type="bibr">(Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016</ref><ref type="bibr">, 2018</ref><ref type="bibr">, 2021)</ref>, the distance, and the systemic velocities (see Table <ref type="table">1</ref>), we calculate the Galactic motion for PTF1 J2238+7430.</p><p>We employed the approach described in Odenkirchen &amp; Brosche (1992) and <ref type="bibr">Pauli et al. (2006)</ref>. As in <ref type="bibr">Kupfer et al. (2020b)</ref>, we use the Galactic potential of <ref type="bibr">Allen &amp; Santillan (1991)</ref> as revised by <ref type="bibr">Irrgang et al. (2013)</ref>. The orbit was integrated from the present to 3 Gyr into the past. We find that the binary moves within a height of 200 pc of the Galactic equator and with very little eccentricity between 9 and 10 kpc from the Galactic center. From the Galactic orbit we conclude that PTF1 J2238+7430 is a member of the Galactic thin-disk population consistent with being member of a young stellar population.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.">Predicted Evolution of the Binary System</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.1.">Formation of the sdB + WD System</head><p>Ruiter et al. (2010) found that the dominant way to form a compact, double, carbon-oxygen core WDs is through stable mass transfer which forms the sdB followed by a phase of unstable mass transfer that forms the white dwarf companion. They present a specific example that starts with a 2.88 M e and 2.45 M e binary pair. In PTF1 J2238+7430, weak eclipses of the WD companion imply a blackbody temperature of 26 800 &#177; 4600 K. From the blackbody temperature, we can estimate the cooling age and find a cooling time of &#8776;25 million years, significantly shorter than the predicted current age of the sdB of &#8776;170 million years (see Section 5.2). Therefore, we predict that the sdB was formed first, and we propose the following evolutionary scenario (illustrated in Figure <ref type="figure">4</ref>) for PTF1 J2238+7430 which explains all observational properties and is similar to the scenario discussed in <ref type="bibr">Ruiter et al. (2010)</ref>.</p><p>The system started as a &#8776; 2 M e main-sequence star (see Section 5.2) that will become the sdB, and a slightly lowermass companion with an orbital period of a few weeks. The sdB progenitor evolves first and starts stable mass transfer to the companion star. At the end of that phase, the sdB has formed with an observed mass of &#8776;0.4 M e and the orbital period has substantially widened, consistent with the first stable RLOF channel described in <ref type="bibr">Han et al. (2002</ref><ref type="bibr">Han et al. ( , 2003))</ref>. The companion star has accreted &#8776;1.7 M e of material from the sdB progenitor and turned into a &#8776;3.5-4 M e star which will then evolve off the main sequence and overflow its Roche Lobe while the sdB star is still burning helium. Due to the large mass ratio at this point, mass transfer will be unstable and initiate a common envelope. The CE phase could happen either during the RGB or AGB phase of the secondary depending on the binary separation at that point. In either case it would leave a compact binary with a massive WD and an sdB at an orbital period of &#8776;86 minutes. The observed high WD mass of 0.725 &#177; 0.026 M e is consistent with the evolution from an intermediate-mass main-sequence star <ref type="bibr">(Cummings et al. 2018)</ref>. The final phase of unstable mass transfer happened &#8776;25 million years ago, after which the WD cooled to its currently observed temperature while gravitational wave radiation decreased the orbital period to the currently observed period of 76 minutes. As also discussed in <ref type="bibr">Ruiter et al. (2010)</ref>, a substantial fraction of compact sdB+WD binaries could exist where the sdB was formed first through stable mass transfer.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.2.">Future Evolution</head><p>To understand the future evolution of the system we employed MESA version 12115 <ref type="bibr">(Paxton et al. 2011</ref><ref type="bibr">(Paxton et al. , 2013</ref><ref type="bibr">(Paxton et al. , 2015</ref><ref type="bibr">(Paxton et al. , 2018</ref><ref type="bibr">(Paxton et al. , 2019))</ref>. <ref type="bibr">Bauer &amp; Kupfer (2021)</ref> use MESA models to show that sdB stars with mass M &#61576; 0.47 M e can descend from either lower-mass main-sequence progenitors that ignite central He burning via an off-center degenerate He flash (M ZAMS &#61576; 2.3 M e ) or from higher-mass main-sequence progenitors that ignite He at the center under nondegenerate conditions (M ZAMS &#61577; 2.3 M e ). <ref type="foot">16</ref> They show that these scenarios lead to different H-envelope structures that influence the subsequent radius evolution of the sdB star, with stars descended from higher-mass progenitors having more compact envelopes and correspondingly higher g log values, as shown in the top panels of Figure <ref type="figure">5</ref> in <ref type="bibr">Bauer &amp; Kupfer (2021)</ref>. The measured g log for PTF1 J2238+7430 requires a relatively extended envelope with a radius that requires that the sdB star descended from the lower-mass channel with a progenitor mass around 2 M e . We find that our best matching MESA model for the measured g log and T eff of this system is a 0.41 M e sdB model descended from a 2.14 M e main-sequence star that ignited the He core via a degenerate He-core flash. This model has a sharp transition from the He core to a H envelope with solar composition. When He ignites, we remove most of the envelope, leaving a thin H-envelope layer of 10 -3 M e so that the subsequent sdB evolution track matches the observed g log and T eff of PTF1 J2238+7430. Figure <ref type="figure">5</ref> shows the g log -T eff evolution of this MESA model, where it approaches the current observed state of PTF1 J2238+7430 after &#8776;170 Myr of evolution and will encounter its Roche lobe and begin transferring mass soon after.</p><p>We model the future binary evolution of this system with a 0.75 M e WD companion using the MESA binary capabilities. The WD model is constructed with a C/O core using the make_co_wd test case from MESA, rescaled to a mass of 0.75 M e , and cooled to the current observed temperature before initializing it into the MESA binary model at the currently observed orbital period with the sdB model. The sdB is currently observed at 95% Roche-lobe filling and will continue to spiral in due to gravitational wave radiation. In our model the sdB will soon fill its Roche lobe and start to donate its hydrogen-rich envelope in six million years at a low rate of &#61576; 10 -10 M e yr -1 (see Bauer &amp; Kupfer 2021, for a detailed overview). Because of the large initial radius of the H envelope, mass transfer will proceed at this low rate for &#8776;50 Myr before the H envelope is exhausted and the He core is finally exposed at a much more compact radius. While the sdB is still helium core burning &#8776;60 Myr from today, the sdB will begin to donate helium-rich material onto the WD at the expected rate of &#8776;1-3&#215;10 -8 M e yr -1 , as shown in Figure <ref type="figure">5</ref>. A helium-rich layer will slowly build up for 10 million years, reaching a critical mass of 0.17 M e , after which the MESA WD model experiences He ignition in the accreted envelope. At this point the binary has an orbital period of &#8776;10 minutes. The sdB has been stripped down to a mass of 0.25 M e , and the WD has a total mass of 0.92 M e .</p><p>Our MESA model predicts that at this point the accreting WD will experience a thermonuclear instability that will lead to a detonation that will likely destroy the WD in a thermonuclear supernova <ref type="bibr">(Woosley &amp; Kasen 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bauer et al. 2017</ref>). Our MESA model for the WD accretor includes the NCO reaction chain as in <ref type="bibr">Bauer et al. (2017)</ref>, and this governs ignition in the accreted He envelope. Because this ignition mechanism is initiated by electron captures on 14 N, it occurs at a density above &#961; = 10 6 g cm -3 where a detonation is likely to form <ref type="bibr">(Woosley &amp; Weaver 1994;</ref><ref type="bibr">Woosley &amp; Kasen 2011)</ref>. The structure of our MESA model at the point of detonation is very similar to the model for CD-30&#176;11223 in <ref type="bibr">Bauer et al. (2017)</ref>, which includes a more detailed discussion of detonation formation under these ignition conditions. At the time of the thermonuclear supernova, the sdB remnant has an orbital velocity of 911 km s -1 and will be released as a hyper-runaway star exceeding the escape velocity of the Galaxy <ref type="bibr">(Bauer et al. 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Neunteufel 2020;</ref><ref type="bibr">Liu et al. 2021;</ref><ref type="bibr">Neunteufel et al. 2021)</ref>. Figure <ref type="figure">4</ref> illustrates the evolutionary sequence proposed for PTF1 J2238+7430.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="6.">Supernova Rate Estimate</head><p>Models of thermonuclear supernovae in WDs with thick (&#61577;0.1 M e ) helium shells indicate that they will yield transients classified as peculiar Type I supernovae <ref type="bibr">(De et al. 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Polin et al. 2019)</ref>. PTF1 J2238+7430, together with CD-30 &#176;11223, therefore mark a small sample of double-detonation, peculiar, thermonuclear supernova progenitors. Using both systems we can estimate a lower limit of thermonuclear supernovae originating in compact hot subdwarf + WD binaries where the sdB donates helium-rich material during helium-core burning. Both systems will have an age of &#8776;500 Myr at the time of the helium-shell detonation and are located within 1 kpc. Because of their young age, we compare the rate of these double-detonation progenitors to the supernova Ia rate as a function of star formation. Under the assumption that these systems typically have an age of &#8776;500 Myr at time of explosion, we find a lower limit of double-detonation explosions of 2 500 kpc -2 Myr -1 from the two known systems. We can compare that to the local star formation rate of 10 -3 M e kpc -2 yr -1 which leads to a double-detonation rate of &#8776;4 &#215; 10 -6 yr -1 . <ref type="bibr">Sullivan et al. (2006)</ref> found a supernova Ia rate of 3.9 &#177; 0.7 &#215; 10 -4 SNe yr -1 (M e yr -1 ) -1 of star formation. With a Galactic star formation rate of &#8776;1 M e yr -1 , we find that the rate at which peculiar thermonuclear supernovae with thick &#8776;0.15 M e helium shells occur in star-forming galaxies could be at least 1% of the type Ia supernova rate. This is in reasonable agreement with the presently observed low rate of thick, helium-shell detonations. We note that thermonuclear supernovae with thick helium layers are likely to produce a transient that would be classified as a peculiar SN Ia with lower luminosities and redder color compared to ordinary SN Ia <ref type="bibr">(Polin et al. 2019)</ref>. <ref type="bibr">De et al. (2019)</ref> presented the discovery of peculiar Type I supernova consistent with a thick helium-shell double-detonation on a sub-Chandrasekhar-mass WD <ref type="bibr">(Polin et al. 2019</ref><ref type="bibr">(Polin et al. , 2021))</ref>. However, one of the distinct differences is that the transient occurred in the outskirts of an elliptical galaxy which points to an old stellar population; this is in disagreement with our observed systems which represent a young population. More recently, <ref type="bibr">De et al. (2020)</ref> presented a sample of calcium-rich transients originating from double detonations with helium shells. They find that the majority of transients are located in old stellar populations. However, <ref type="bibr">De et al. (2020)</ref> note that a small subsample (iPTF16hgs, SN2016hnk and SN 2019ofm) were found in star-forming environments, suggesting that there is a small but likely nonzero contribution from young systems which could potentially be related to systems like CD-30&#176;11223 and PTF1 J2238+7430.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="7.">Summary and Conclusion</head><p>As part of our search for short-period sdB binaries we discovered PTF1 J2238+7430 using PTF and subsequently ZTF light curves. We find a period of P orb = 76.34179(2) minutes. Follow-up observations confirmed the system as an sdB with M sdB = 0.383 &#177; 0.028 M e and a WD companion with M WD = 0.725 &#177; 0.026 M e . High-speed photometry observations with Chimera revealed a weak WD eclipse which allows us to measure the blackbody temperature and radius of the WD. We find a temperature of 26,800 &#177; 4600 K and a radius of = -+ R 0.0109 WD 0.0003 0.0002 R e , fully consistent with cooling models for carbon-oxygen core WDs. We find a cooling age of &#8776;25 Myr for the WD which is significantly shorter than our age estimate for the sdB of &#8776;170 Myr. This can be explained by the sdB forming first through stable mass transfer, followed by the WD forming &#8776;25 Myr ago through a common-envelope phase. This shows that evolutionary scenarios where the sdB is formed first through stable mass transfer must be considered for compact sdB binaries with WD companions.</p><p>We employed MESA to calculate the future evolution of the system, finding that the sdB in PTF1 J2238+7430 will start mass transfer of the hydrogen-rich envelope in &#8776;6 Myr. In &#8776;60 Myr, after a phase of hydrogen and helium mass transfer, the WD will build up a helium layer of 0.17 M e leading to a total WD mass of 0.92 M e . Our models predict that at this point the WD will likely detonate in a peculiar thermonuclear supernova making PTF1 J2238+7430 the second known progenitor for a supernova with a thick helium layer. Using both systems we estimate that at least 1% of type Ia supernova originate from compact sdB+WD binaries in young populations of galaxies with similar star formation rates compared to the Milky Way. Although this is only a lower limit, the estimate is broadly consistent with the low number of observed peculiar thermonuclear supernovae. Observations were obtained with the Samuel Oschin Telescope at the Palomar Observatory as part of the PTF project, a scientific collaboration between the California Institute of Technology, Columbia University, Las Cumbres Observatory, the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, the University of Oxford, and the Weizmann Institute of Science.</p><p>Based on observations obtained with the Samuel Oschin 48 inch Telescope at the Palomar Observatory as part of the Zwicky Transient Facility project. ZTF is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant No. AST-1440341 and a collaboration including Caltech, IPAC, the Weizmann Institute for Science, the Oskar Klein Center at Stockholm University, the University of Maryland, the University of Washington, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron and Humboldt University, Los Alamos National Laboratories, the TANGO Consortium of Taiwan, the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories. Operations are conducted by COO, IPAC, and UW. Some of the data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation. The authors wish to recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of Maunakea has always had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain.</p><p>Some results presented in this paper are based on observations made with the WHT operated on the island of La Palma by the Isaac Newton Group in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Institutio de Astrofisica de Canarias.</p><p>This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (<ref type="url">https://www.cosmos.esa.int/  gaia</ref>), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC, <ref type="url">https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/  dpac/consortium</ref>). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia Multilateral Agreement.  <ref type="bibr">(Paxton et al. 2011</ref><ref type="bibr">(Paxton et al. , 2013</ref><ref type="bibr">(Paxton et al. , 2015</ref><ref type="bibr">(Paxton et al. , 2018</ref><ref type="bibr">(Paxton et al. , 2019))</ref>, Matplotlib <ref type="bibr">(Hunter 2007)</ref>, Astropy (Astropy <ref type="bibr">Collaboration et al. 2013</ref><ref type="bibr">Collaboration et al. , 2018))</ref>, Numpy <ref type="bibr">(Oliphant 2015)</ref>, ISIS <ref type="bibr">(Houck &amp; Denicola 2000)</ref>, MAKEE (<ref type="url">https://sites.astro.caltech.edu/  ~tb/makee/</ref>).</p></div><note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" n="12" xml:id="foot_0"><p>https://github.com/ebellm/pyraf-dbsp</p></note>
			<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" n="13" xml:id="foot_1"><p>https://sites.astro.caltech.edu/~tb/makee/</p></note>
			<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_2"><p>The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 925:L12 (10pp), 2022 February 1 Kupfer et al.</p></note>
			<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" n="14" xml:id="foot_3"><p>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14833</p></note>
			<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" n="15" xml:id="foot_4"><p>http://argonaut.skymaps.info/</p></note>
			<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" n="16" xml:id="foot_5"><p>The precise value of the progenitor M ZAMS for which He ignition conditions change depends somewhat on metallicity and overshoot<ref type="bibr">(Ostrowski et al. 2021)</ref>, but generally lies between about 2.0 and 2.3 M e .</p></note>
		</body>
		</text>
</TEI>
