Participating in the scientific publication process: exploring how pre-college students perceive publication within the scientific enterprise.
                        
                    - Award ID(s):
- 2010333
- PAR ID:
- 10322126
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
- ISSN:
- 2662-2300
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
- 
            In the last two decades, research experiences for pre-college students have gone from the exception of a typical experience of a high school student, to the norm. Often, these research experiences include distinct disciplinary literacy outputs that mimic those of professionals. And while much attention has been paid to supporting students in scientific writing, other disciplinary literacy practices, such as peer-review and publication, are often part of the hidden-curriculum of science research, thus excluding students from fully understanding ways in which scientific knowledge is constructed, refined, and disseminated (Authors, 2022). As more students participate in research experiences and the dissemination of their work, it is important to understand how mentors support the development of disciplinary literacies, including those that are deemed “professional”. To this end, we used a mixed-methods study of interviews and surveys to examine the experience and conceptions of the mentors who guided precollege students through the writing and publication of their scientific research projects. Using the construct of cognitive apprenticeship to evaluate our findings, we find that although mentors highly value peer-review and publication within science, they are not intentional about bringing these practices to the forefront of the research process for their student. Additionally, mentors report a range of involvement level in guiding students through the publication process. Our findings suggest that more work is needed to help reveal professional disciplinary literacy practices to students. mentors could benefit from resources to help them more intentionally involve students in such disciplinary literacy practices.more » « less
- 
            Abstract As science becomes ever more collaborative, the mechanisms for working in large and more diverse groups become more necessary. In the present article, I explore the utility of within-group collaboration agreements on participant conduct toward other project participants, within-group data sharing, and authorship of published manuscripts for research groups. Such agreements can solidify the expectations of the interactions among collaborators, potential rewards, and a feeling of security for those involved in the projects. They could also lead to more productive and satisfying research, as well as improving the training of future scientists.more » « less
- 
            Newton, Irene L. (Ed.)ABSTRACT Clear and effective figures are central to successfully communicating scientific data. Here, we present ggpubfigs, an R package with colorblind-friendly color palettes and extensions of the ggplot2 graphic system, which helps make publication-quality scientific figures from quantitative data; ggpubfigs is an open-source and user-friendly tool that is available from https://github.com/JLSteenwyk/ggpubfigs .more » « less
 An official website of the United States government
An official website of the United States government 
				
			 
					 
					
 
                                    