An official website of the United States government
Considerable research has examined human mate preferences across cultures, finding universal sex differences in preferences for attractiveness and resources as well as sources of systematic cultural variation. Two competing perspectives—an evolutionary psychological perspective and a biosocial role perspective—offer alternative explanations for these findings. However, the original data on which each perspective relies are decades old, and the literature is fraught with conflicting methods, analyses, results, and conclusions. Using a new 45-country sample ( N = 14,399), we attempted to replicate classic studies and test both the evolutionary and biosocial role perspectives. Support for universal sex differences in preferences remains robust: Men, more than women, prefer attractive, young mates, and women, more than men, prefer older mates with financial prospects. Cross-culturally, both sexes have mates closer to their own ages as gender equality increases. Beyond age of partner, neither pathogen prevalence nor gender equality robustly predicted sex differences or preferences across countries.
more »
« less
Sex differences in human mate preferences vary across sex ratios
A wide range of literature connects sex ratio and mating behaviours in non-human animals. However, research examining sex ratio and human mating is limited in scope. Prior work has examined the relationship between sex ratio and desire for short-term, uncommitted mating as well as outcomes such as marriage and divorce rates. Less empirical attention has been directed towards the relationship between sex ratio and mate preferences, despite the importance of mate preferences in the human mating literature. To address this gap, we examined sex ratio's relationship to the variation in preferences for attractiveness, resources, kindness, intelligence and health in a long-term mate across 45 countries ( n = 14 487). We predicted that mate preferences would vary according to relative power of choice on the mating market, with increased power derived from having relatively few competitors and numerous potential mates. We found that each sex tended to report more demanding preferences for attractiveness and resources where the opposite sex was abundant, compared to where the opposite sex was scarce. This pattern dovetails with those found for mating strategies in humans and mate preferences across species, highlighting the importance of sex ratio for understanding variation in human mate preferences.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1845586
- PAR ID:
- 10323051
- Author(s) / Creator(s):
- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; more »
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Volume:
- 288
- Issue:
- 1955
- ISSN:
- 0962-8452
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Climatic and soil features influence resources and mate availability for plants. Because of different resource/mating demands of the male and female reproductive pathways, environmental variation can drive geographic patterns of sex‐specific factors in sexually polymorphic species. Yet, the relationship between environment and sex, sexual dimorphism or sex chromosomes at the range‐wide scale is underexamined.Using ~7000 herbarium and iNaturalist specimens we generate a landscape‐scale understanding of how sex ratio and sexual dimorphism vary with geographic, climatic and soil gradients in the sexually polymorphic wild strawberry (Fragaria virginiana) and test whether these conform to predictions from theory. Then, for ~300 specimens we use genotyping of the sex‐determining region (SDR haplotypes) to reveal geographic and phenotypic patterns in sex chromosome types.Across North America, the sex ratio was hermaphrodite/male‐biased and was associated more with soil attributes than climate. Sex ratio‐environment associations matched predictions for subdioecy in the West but for gynodioecy in the East. Climatic factors correlated with sexual dimorphism in traits related to carbon acquisition (leaf size and runnering while flowering) but not mate access (petal size, flowering time). Variation in sexual dimorphism was due to one sex being more responsive to the environmental variation than the other. Specifically, leaf length in females was more responsive to variation in precipitation than in hermaphrodite/males, but the probability of runnering while flowering in hermaphrodite/males was more responsive to variation in temperature than in females. The ancestral sex chromosome type was most common overall. But the frequency of the more derived sex chromosomes varied with environmental factors that differed between East–West regions.Synthesis. A landscape‐level perspective revealed that variation in soil and climate factors can explain geospatial variation in sex ratio and sexual dimorphism in a wild strawberry. Variation in sex ratio was associated more with soil resources than climate, while variation in sexual dimorphism was the result of sex‐differential responses to climate for vegetative traits but a similar response to abiotic factors in mate access traits. Finally, sex chromosome types were associated with soil moisture and precipitation in ways that could contribute to the evolution of sex determination.more » « less
-
Abstract Variation in temperature can affect the expression of a variety of important fitness‐related behaviours, including those involved with mate attraction and selection, with consequences for the coordination of mating across variable environments. We examined how temperature influences the expression of male mating signals and female mate preferences—as well as the relationship between how male signals and female mate preferences change across temperatures (signal–preference temperature coupling)—inEnchenopa binotatatreehoppers. These small plant‐feeding insects communicate using plantborne vibrations, and our field surveys indicate they experience significant natural variation in temperature during the mating season. We tested for signal–preference temperature coupling in four populations ofE. binotataby manipulating temperature in a controlled laboratory environment. We measured the frequency of male signals—the trait for which females show strongest preference—and female peak preference—the signal frequency most preferred by females—across a range of biologically relevant temperatures (18°C–36°C). We found a strong effect of temperature on both male signals and female preferences, which generated signal–preference temperature coupling within each population. Even in a population in which male signals mismatched female preferences, the temperature coupling reinforces predicted directional selection across all temperatures. Additionally, we found similar thermal sensitivity in signals and preferences across populations even though populations varied in the mean frequency of male signals and female peak preference. Together, these results suggest that temperature variation should not affect the action of sexual selection via female choice, but rather should reinforce stabilizing selection in populations with signal–preference matches, and directional selection in those with signal–preference mismatches. Finally, we do not predict that thermal variation will disrupt the coordination of mating in this species by generating signal–preference mismatches at thermal extremes.more » « less
-
Patricelli, Gail L. (Ed.)Sexual selection by mate choice is a powerful force that can lead to evolutionary change, and models of why females choose particular mates are central to understanding its effects. Predominant mate choice theories assume preferences are determined solely by genetic inheritance, an assumption still lacking widespread support. Moreover, preferences often vary among individuals or populations, fail to correspond with conspicuous male traits, or change with context, patterns not predicted by dominant models. Here, we propose a new model that explains this mate choice complexity with one general hypothesized mechanism, “Inferred Attractiveness.” In this model, females acquire mating preferences by observing others’ choices and use context-dependent information to infer which traits are attractive. They learn to prefer the feature of a chosen male that most distinguishes him from other available males. Over generations, this process produces repeated population-level switches in preference and maintains male trait variation. When viability selection is strong, Inferred Attractiveness produces population-wide adaptive preferences superficially resembling “good genes.” However, it results in widespread preference variation or nonadaptive preferences under other predictable circumstances. By casting the female brain as the central selective agent, Inferred Attractiveness captures novel and dynamic aspects of sexual selection and reconciles inconsistencies between mate choice theory and observed behavior.more » « less
-
Socially induced plasticity in mating signals and mate preferences is widespread in animals. The timing of plasticity induction is key for mating and evolutionary consequences: plasticity induced before and after dispersal often results in different patterns of mate choices. Here we discuss two additional factors that may be of importance: the nature of social interactions that are involved at different stages, and the direction and strength of the effects. We review a case study with the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers. In spite of a wide scope for social plasticity in E. binotata across life stages, effects of the juvenile social environment were stronger and more common, especially those influencing the signalepreference relationship. These results emphasize the importance of studying variation in plasticity induced along various life stages and of considering all the mating traits that may be socially plastic. We suggest that systematic investigation of these patterns across taxa will help better understand the origin of diversity in animal communication systems.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1115
