An official website of the United States government
Plants are attacked by multiple insect pest species and insect herbivory can alter plant defense mechanisms. The plant defense responses to a specific herbivore may also contribute to the herbivore growth/survival on plants. Feeding by one insect species can modulate the plant defenses, which can either facilitate or hamper the colonization of subsequent incoming insects. However, little is known about the effect of sequential herbivory on sorghum plants. In this study, we demonstrate that a specialist aphid, sugarcane aphid (SCA; Melanaphis sacchari ) grows faster on sorghum than a generalist aphid species, greenbug (GB; Schizaphis graminum ). We also determined how the pre-infestation of SCA on sorghum affected the invasion of GB and vice-versa . Our sequential herbivory experiments revealed that SCA reproduction was lower on GB-primed sorghum plants, however, the reverse was not true. To assess the differences in plant defenses induced by specialist vs. generalist aphids, we monitored the expression of salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) marker genes, and flavonoid biosynthetic pathway genes after 48 h of aphid infestation. The results indicated that GB infestation induced higher expression of SA and JA-related genes, and flavonoid pathway genes ( DFR , FNR , and FNSII ) compared to SCA infestation. Overall, our results suggested that GB-infested plants activate the plant defenses via phytohormones and flavonoids at early time points and hampers the colonization of incoming SCA, as well as explain the reproductive success of SCA compared to GB.
more »
« less
The dual function of elicitors and effectors from insects: reviewing the ‘arms race’ against plant defenses
Following injury by an insect herbivore, plants rapidly activate induced defenses that may directly or indirectly affect the insect. Such defense pathways are influenced by a multitude of factors; however, cues from the insect’s oral secretions are perhaps the most well studied mediators of such plant responses. The relationship between plants and their insect herbivores is often termed an ‘evolutionary arms race’ of strategies for each organism to either overcome defenses or to avoid attack. However, these compounds that can elicit a plant defense response that is detrimental to the insect may also benefit the physiology or metabolism of an insect species. Indeed, several insect elicitors of plant defenses (such as the fatty acid-amino acid conjugate, volicitin) are known to enhance an insect’s ability to obtain nutritionally important compounds from plant tissue. Here we re-examine the well-known elicitors and effectors from chewing insects to demonstrate not only our incomplete understanding of the specific biochemical and molecular cascades involved in these interactions but also to consider the role of these compounds for the insect species itself. Finally, this overview discusses opportunities for research in the field of plant-insect interactions by utilizing tools such as genomics and proteomics to integrate the future study of these interactions through ecological, physiological, and evolutionary disciplines.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1645548
- PAR ID:
- 10323530
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Plant Molecular Biology
- ISSN:
- 0167-4412
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Virtually all plants employ direct and indirect defenses against herbivores. While it is known that plant defenses can be affected by belowground symbiotic microbes under controlled conditions, studies showing these multitrophic interactions in nature are surprisingly scarce. Here we tested for effects of rhizobia on insect attraction and direct defense (cyanogenesis) in wild lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) plants in Costa Rica. We performed bioassays with rhizobia-inoculated (R+) and rhizobiafree (R-) potted plants distributed among native lima bean communities at two spatially separated field sites (450 km apart) and in two field seasons. Without affecting overall plant size, rhizobia altered leaf chemistry (cyanogenesis and soluble leaf nitrogen) and ultimately insect communities visiting the plants. Natural herbivorous chrysomelid beetles were strongly attracted to R+ plants, while natural enemies, ants and parasitoid wasps, preferred R- plants resulting in a particularly high herbivore:carnivore ratio on R + plants. This suggests that symbiotic microbes mediate trophic interactions by influencing both direct and indirect plant defenses against herbivores. Our results show that rhizobia affect the plant defensive phenotype and have cascading effects on plant-insect interactions in nature.more » « less
-
Abstract Plant–herbivore interactions reciprocally influence species’ evolutionary trajectories. These interactions have led to many physical and chemical defenses across the plant kingdom. Some plants have even evolved indirect defense strategies to outsource their protection to ant bodyguards by bribing them with a sugary reward (nectar). Identifying the evolutionary processes underpinning these indirect defenses provide insight into the evolution of plant-animal interactions. Using a cross-kingdom, phylogenetic approach, we examined the convergent evolution of ant-guarding nectaries across ferns and flowering plants. Here, we discover that nectaries originated in ferns and flowering plants concurrently during the Cretaceous, coinciding with the rise of plant associations in ants. While nectaries in flowering plants evolved steadily through time, ferns showed a pronounced lag of nearly 100 My between their origin and subsequent diversification in the Cenozoic. Importantly, we find that as ferns transitioned from the forest floor into the canopy, they secondarily recruited ant bodyguards from existing ant-angiosperm relationships.more » « less
-
Abstract Plant viruses both trigger and inhibit host plant defense responses, including defenses that target their insect vectors, such as aphids. Turnip mosaic viru (TuMV) infection and its protein, NIa-Pro (nuclear inclusion protease a), suppress aphid-induced plant defenses, however the mechanisms of this suppression are still largely unknown. In this study, we determined that NIa-Pro’s protease activity is required to increase aphid performance on host plants and that 40 transcripts with predicted NIa-Pro cleavage sequences are regulated in Arabidopsis plants challenged with aphids and/or virus compared to healthy controls. One of the candidates, MEDIATOR 16 (MED16), regulates the transcription of ethylene (ET)/jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent defense responses against necrotrophic pathogens. We show that a nuclear localization signal is removed from MED16 by specific proteolytic cleavage in virus-infected plants and in plants overexpressing NIa-Pro in the presence of aphids. Although some cleavage was occasionally detected in the absence of virus infection, it occurred at a much higher rate in plants that were virus-infected or overexpressing NIa-Pro, especially when aphids were also present. This suggests MED16 functions in the nucleus may be impacted in virus infected plants. Consistent with this, induction of the MED16-dependent transcript ofPLANT DEFENSIN 1.2 (PDF1.2), was reduced in virus-infected plants and in plants expressing NIa-Pro compared to controls, but not in plants expressing NIa-Pro C151A that lacks its protease activity. Finally, we show the performance of both the virus and the aphid vector was enhanced onmed16mutant Arabidopsis compared to controls. Overall, this study demonstrates MED16 regulates defense responses against both the virus and the aphid and provides insights into the mechanism by which TuMV suppresses anti-virus and anti-herbivore defenses.more » « less
-
Phytochemical defenses, plant-produced compounds that can deter or slow herbivores, are critical in influencing the interactions between herbivores and their host plants—some of the most diverse and abundant organisms on earth. We discuss the foundational findings and theories related to the direct defense of plants against herbivores by these compounds, as well as continuing research questions in this field. We highlight the costs associated with phytochemical defense production and variation within individual plants in the distribution of phytochemicals, both spatially and temporally. We then discuss coevolutionary theory and the adaptations of herbivores to cope with phytochemical defense compounds. Last, we delve into the incredible diversity of phytochemical compounds, the role of diversity in herbivory, and new ways of measuring and understanding phytochemical diversity.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-021-01203-2
