An official website of the United States government
Evolutionary variation in the wing pigmentation of butterflies and moths offers striking examples of adaptation by crypsis and mimicry. Thecortexlocus has been independently mapped as the locus controlling color polymorphisms in 15 lepidopteran species, suggesting that it acts as a genomic hotspot for the diversification of wing patterns, but functional validation through protein-coding knockouts has proven difficult to obtain. Our study unveils the role of a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) which we nameivory, transcribed from thecortexlocus, in modulating color patterning in butterflies. Strikingly,ivoryexpression prefigures most melanic patterns during pupal development, suggesting an early developmental role in specifying scale identity. To test this, we generated CRISPR mosaic knock-outs in five nymphalid butterfly species and show thativorymutagenesis yields transformations of dark pigmented scales into white or light-colored scales. Genotyping ofVanessa carduigermline mutants associates these phenotypes to small on-target deletions at the conserved first exon ofivory. In contrast,cortexgermline mutant butterflies with confirmed null alleles lack any wing phenotype and exclude a color patterning role for this adjacent gene. Overall, these results show that a lncRNA gene acts as a master switch of color pattern specification and played key roles in the adaptive diversification of wing patterns in butterflies.
more »
« less
A large deletion at the cortex locus eliminates butterfly wing patterning
Abstract As the genetic basis of natural and domesticated variation has been described in recent years, a number of hotspot genes have been repeatedly identified as the targets of selection, Heliconius butterflies display a spectacular diversity of pattern variants in the wild and the genetic basis of these patterns has been well-described. Here, we sought to identify the mechanism behind an unusual pattern variant that is instead found in captivity, the ivory mutant, in which all scales on both the wings and body become white or yellow. Using a combination of autozygosity mapping and coverage analysis from 37 captive individuals, we identify a 78-kb deletion at the cortex wing patterning locus, a gene which has been associated with wing pattern evolution in H. melpomene and 10 divergent lepidopteran species. This deletion is undetected among 458 wild Heliconius genomes samples, and its dosage explains both homozygous and heterozygous ivory phenotypes found in captivity. The deletion spans a large 5′ region of the cortex gene that includes a facultative 5′UTR exon detected in larval wing disk transcriptomes. CRISPR mutagenesis of this exon replicates the wing phenotypes from coding knock-outs of cortex, consistent with a functional role of ivory-deleted elements in establishing scale color fate. Population demographics reveal that the stock giving rise to the ivory mutant has a mixed origin from across the wild range of H. melpomene, and supports a scenario where the ivory mutation occurred after the introduction of cortex haplotypes from Ecuador. Homozygotes for the ivory deletion are inviable while heterozygotes are the targets of artificial selection, joining 40 other examples of allelic variants that provide heterozygous advantage in animal populations under artificial selection by fanciers and breeders. Finally, our results highlight the promise of autozygosity and association mapping for identifying the genetic basis of aberrant mutations in captive insect populations.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2110534
- PAR ID:
- 10324084
- Editor(s):
- Oliver, B
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 2160-1836
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Müllerian mimicry strongly exemplifies the power of natural selection. However, the exact measure of such adaptive phenotypic convergence and the possible causes of its imperfection often remain unidentified. Here, we first quantify wing colour pattern differences in the forewing region of 14 co-mimetic colour pattern morphs of the butterfly species Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene and measure the extent to which mimicking colour pattern morphs are not perfectly identical. Next, using gene-editing CRISPR/Cas9 KO experiments of the gene WntA , which has been mapped to colour pattern diversity in these butterflies, we explore the exact areas of the wings in which WntA affects colour pattern formation differently in H. erato and H. melpomene. We find that, while the relative size of the forewing pattern is generally nearly identical between co-mimics, the CRISPR/Cas9 KO results highlight divergent boundaries in the wing that prevent the co-mimics from achieving perfect mimicry. We suggest that this mismatch may be explained by divergence in the gene regulatory network that defines wing colour patterning in both species, thus constraining morphological evolution even between closely related species.more » « less
-
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are transcribed elements increasingly recognized for their roles in regulating gene expression. Thus far, however, we have little understanding of how lncRNAs contribute to evolution and adaptation. Here, we show that a conserved lncRNA,ivory, is an important color patterning gene in the buckeye butterflyJunonia coenia.ivoryoverlaps withcortex, a locus linked to multiple cases of crypsis and mimicry in Lepidoptera. Along with a companion paper by Livraghi et al., we argue thativory, notcortex, is the color pattern gene of interest at this locus. InJ. coenia, a cluster ofcis-regulatory elements (CREs) in the first intron ofivoryare genetically associated with natural variation in seasonal color pattern plasticity, and targeted deletions of these CREs phenocopy seasonal phenotypes. Deletions of differentivoryCREs produce other distinct phenotypes as well, including loss of melanic eyespot rings, and positive and negative changes in overall wing pigmentation. We show that the color pattern transcription factors Spineless, Bric-a-brac, and Ftz-f1 bind to theivorypromoter during wing pattern development, suggesting that they directly regulateivory. This case study demonstrates howcis-regulation of a single noncoding RNA can exert diverse and nuanced effects on the evolution and development of color patterns, including modulating seasonally plastic color patterns.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Characterizing the genetic complexity of adaptation and trait evolution is a major emphasis of evolutionary biology and genetics. Incongruent findings from genetic studies have resulted in conceptual models ranging from a few large-effect loci to massively polygenic architectures. Here, we combine chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing, Hi-C, RNA sequencing, and 40 whole-genome sequences from Heliconius butterflies to show that red color pattern diversification occurred via many genomic loci. We find that the red wing pattern master regulatory transcription factor Optix binds dozens of loci also under selection, which frequently form three-dimensional adaptive hubs with selection acting on multiple physically interacting genes. Many Optix-bound genes under selection are tied to pigmentation and wing development, and these loci collectively maintain separation between adaptive red color pattern phenotypes in natural populations. We propose a model of trait evolution where functional connections between loci may resolve much of the disparity between large-effect and polygenic evolutionary models.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Heliconius butterflies have bright patterns on their wings that tell potential predators that they are toxic. As a result, predators learn to avoid eating them. Over time, unrelated species of butterflies have evolved similar patterns to avoid predation through a process known as Müllerian mimicry. Worldwide, there are over 180,000 species of butterflies and moths, most of which have different wing patterns. How do genes create this pattern diversity? And do butterflies use similar genes to create similar wing patterns? One of the genes involved in creating wing patterns is called cortex . This gene has a large region of DNA around it that does not code for proteins, but instead, controls whether cortex is on or off in different parts of the wing. Changes in this non-coding region can act like switches, turning regions of the wing into different colours and creating complex patterns, but it is unclear how these switches have evolved. Butterfly wings get their colour from tiny structures called scales, which each have their own unique set of pigments. In Heliconius butterflies, there are three types of scales: yellow/white scales, black scales, and red/orange/brown scales. Livraghi et al. used a DNA editing technique called CRISPR to find out whether the cortex gene affects scale type. First, Livraghi et al. confirmed that deleting cortex turned black and red scales yellow. Next, they used the same technique to manipulate the non-coding DNA around the cortex gene to see the effect on the wing pattern. This manipulation turned a black-winged butterfly into a butterfly with a yellow wing band, a pattern that occurs naturally in Heliconius butterflies. The next step was to find the mutation responsible for the appearance of yellow wing bands in nature. It turns out that a bit of extra genetic code, derived from so-called ‘jumping genes’, had inserted itself into the non-coding DNA around the cortex gene, ‘flipping’ the switch and leading to the appearance of the yellow scales. Genetic information contains the instructions to generate shape and form in most organisms. These instructions evolve over millions of years, creating everything from bacteria to blue whales. Butterfly wings are visual evidence of evolution, but the way their genes create new patterns isn't specific to butterflies. Understanding wing patterns can help researchers to learn how genetic switches control diversity across other species too.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkac021
