More Like this

1. The Secret Life of Hackathon Code Where does it come from and where does it go?

   https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR52588.2021.00020  

   Imam, Ahmed ; Dey, Tapajit ; Nolte, Alexander ; Mockus, Audris ; Herbsleb, James D. ( May 2021 , Mining Software Repositories)

   null (Ed.)

   Background: Hackathons have become popular events for teams to collaborate on projects and develop software prototypes. Most existing research focuses on activities during an event with limited attention to the evolution of the code brought to or created during a hackathon. Aim: We aim to understand the evolution of hackathon-related code, specifically, how much hackathon teams rely on pre-existing code or how much new code they develop during a hackathon. Moreover, we aim to understand if and where that code gets reused, and what factors affect reuse. Method: We collected information about 22,183 hackathon projects from DEVPOST– a hackathon database – and obtained related code (blobs), authors, and project characteristics from the WORLD OF CODE. We investigated if code blobs in hackathon projects were created before, during, or after an event by identifying the original blob creation date and author, and also checked if the original author was a hackathon project member. We tracked code reuse by first identifying all commits containing blobs created during an event before determining all projects that contain those commits. Result: While only approximately 9.14% of the code blobs are created during hackathons, this amount is still significant considering time and member constraints of such events. Approximately a third of these code blobs get reused in other projects. The number of associated technologies and the number of participants in a project increase reuse probability. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates to what extent pre-existing code is used and new code is created during a hackathon and how much of it is reused elsewhere afterwards. Our findings help to better understand code reuse as a phenomenon and the role of hackathons in this context and can serve as a starting point for further studies in this area. 

   more » « less
2. Gene Drive for Mosquito Control: Where Did It Come from and Where Are We Headed?

   https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091006  

   Macias, Vanessa ; Ohm, Johanna ; Rasgon, Jason ( September 2017 , International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
3. Simulation for Cyber Risk Management – Where are we, and Where do we Want to Go?

   https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC40007.2019.9004688  

   Shetty, Sachin ; Ray, Indrajit ; Ceilk, Nurcin ; Mesham, Michael ; Bastian, Nathaniel ; Zhu, Quanyan ( December 2019 , 2019 Winter Simulation Conference, WSC 2019)

   null (Ed.)
4. The National Environmental Policy Act and the USDA Forest Service: Where We Agree, Where We Disagree, and Why

   https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvab076  

   Fleischman, Forrest ; Struthers, Cory ; Arnold, Gwen ; Dockry, Michael J. ; Scott, Tyler ( January 2022 , Journal of Forestry)

   In this article, we respond to a critique of our earlier work examining the USDA Forest Service’s (USFS’s) planning processes. We appreciate that our critics introduce new data to the discussion of USFS planning. Further data integration is a promising path to developing a deeper understanding of agency activities. Our critics’ analysis largely supports our original claims. Our most important difference is in our conceptualization of the planning process’s relationship to agency goals. Although our critics conceive of the USFS’s legally prescribed planning processes as a barrier to land management activities, we believe that public comment periods, scientific analysis, and land management activities are tools the agency uses to achieve its goals of managing land in the public interest.

   Study Implications: The USDA Forest Service’s current planning process has been critiqued as a barrier to accomplishing land management activities, but it is also an important tool for insuring science-based management and understanding public values and interests that the agency is legally bound to uphold.

    

   more » « less
5. CUREs in biochemistry-where we are and where we should go: CUREs in Biochemistry

   https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20989  

   Bell, Jessica K. ; Eckdahl, Todd T. ; Hecht, David A. ; Killion, Patrick J. ; Latzer, Joachim ; Mans, Tamara L. ; Provost, Joseph J. ; Rakus, John F. ; Siebrasse, Erica A. ; Ellis Bell, J. ( January 2017 , Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education)