More Like this

1. Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with loglog({T}) Switching Cost

   Qiao, Dan ; Yin, Ming ; Min, Ming ; Wang, Yu-Xiang ( June 2022 , Proceedings of Machine Learning Research)

   Chaudhuri, Kamalika and (Ed.)

   We study the problem of reinforcement learning (RL) with low (policy) switching cost {—} a problem well-motivated by real-life RL applications in which deployments of new policies are costly and the number of policy updates must be low. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm based on stage-wise exploration and adaptive policy elimination that achieves a regret of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{H^4S^2AT})$ while requiring a switching cost of $O(HSA \log\log T)$. This is an exponential improvement over the best-known switching cost $O(H^2SA\log T)$ among existing methods with $\widetilde{O}(\mathrm{poly}(H,S,A)\sqrt{T})$ regret. In the above, $S,A$ denotes the number of states and actions in an $H$-horizon episodic Markov Decision Process model with unknown transitions, and $T$ is the number of steps. As a byproduct of our new techniques, we also derive a reward-free exploration algorithm with a switching cost of $O(HSA)$. Furthermore, we prove a pair of information-theoretical lower bounds which say that (1) Any no-regret algorithm must have a switching cost of $\Omega(HSA)$; (2) Any $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret algorithm must incur a switching cost of $\Omega(HSA\log\log T)$. Both our algorithms are thus optimal in their switching costs. 

   more » « less
2. Logarithmic Regret from Sublinear Hints

   Bhaskara, Aditya ; Cutkosky, Ashok ; Kumar, Ravi ; Purohit, Manish ( December 2021 , Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (NeurIPS 2021))

   We consider the online linear optimization problem, where at every step the algorithm plays a point x_t in the unit ball, and suffers loss for some cost vector c_t that is then revealed to the algorithm. Recent work showed that if an algorithm receives a "hint" h_t that has non-trivial correlation with c_t before it plays x_t, then it can achieve a logarithmic regret guarantee, improving on the classical sqrt(T) bound. In this work, we study the question of whether an algorithm really requires a hint at every time step. Somewhat surprisingly, we show that an algorithm can obtain logarithmic regret with just O(sqrt(T)) hints under a natural query model. We give two applications of our result, to the well-studied setting of optimistic regret bounds and to the problem of online learning with abstention. 

   more » « less
3. Near-Optimal Differentially Private Reinforcement Learning

   Qiao, Dan ; Wang, Yu-Xiang ( April 2023 , Proceedings of Machine Learning Research)

   Ruiz, Francisco and (Ed.)

   Motivated by personalized healthcare and other applications involving sensitive data, we study online exploration in reinforcement learning with differential privacy (DP) constraints. Existing work on this problem established that no-regret learning is possible under joint differential privacy (JDP) and local differential privacy (LDP) but did not provide an algorithm with optimal regret. We close this gap for the JDP case by designing an $\epsilon$-JDP algorithm with a regret of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{SAH^2T}+S^2AH^3/\epsilon)$ which matches the information-theoretic lower bound of non-private learning for all choices of $\epsilon> S^{1.5}A^{0.5} H^2/\sqrt{T}$. In the above, $S$, $A$ denote the number of states and actions, $H$ denotes the planning horizon, and $T$ is the number of steps. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first private RL algorithm that achieves privacy for free asymptotically as $T\rightarrow \infty$. Our techniques — which could be of independent interest — include privately releasing Bernstein-type exploration bonuses and an improved method for releasing visitation statistics. The same techniques also imply a slightly improved regret bound for the LDP case. 

   more » « less
4. Near-Optimal Differentially Private Reinforcement Learning

   Qiao, Dan ; Wang, Yu-Xiang ( April 2023 , Proceedings of Machine Learning Research)

   Motivated by personalized healthcare and other applications involving sensitive data, we study online exploration in reinforcement learning with differential privacy (DP) constraints. Existing work on this problem established that no-regret learning is possible under joint differential privacy (JDP) and local differential privacy (LDP) but did not provide an algorithm with optimal regret. We close this gap for the JDP case by designing an ϵ-JDP algorithm with a regret of O˜(sqrt(SAH^2T) +S^2AH^3/ϵ) which matches the information-theoretic lower bound of non-private learning for all choices of ϵ>S^1.5A^0.5H^2/sqrt(T). In the above, S, A denote the number of states and actions, H denotes the planning horizon, and T is the number of steps. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first private RL algorithm that achieves \emph{privacy for free} asymptotically as T→∞. Our techniques -- which could be of independent interest -- include privately releasing Bernstein-type exploration bonuses and an improved method for releasing visitation statistics. The same techniques also imply a slightly improved regret bound for the LDP case. 

   more » « less
5. Bandit Online Linear Optimization with Hints and Queries

   Bhaskara, Aditya ; Cutkosky, Ashok ; Kumar, Ravi ; Purohit, Manish ( July 2023 , Proceedings of Machine Learning Research)

   We study variants of the online linear optimization (OLO) problem with bandit feedback, where the algorithm has access to external information about the unknown cost vector. Our motivation is the recent body of work on using such “hints” towards improving regret bounds for OLO problems in the full-information setting. Unlike in the full-information OLO setting, with bandit feedback, we first show that one cannot improve the standard regret bounds of O(\sqrt{T}) by using hints, even if they are always well-correlated with the cost vector. In contrast, if the algorithm is empowered to issue queries and if all the responses are correct, then we show O(\log(T)) regret is achievable. We then show how to make this result more robust — when some of the query responses can be adversarial — by using a little feedback on the quality of the responses. 

   more » « less