More Like this

1. The Chemistry Women Mentorship Network: women helping women climb higher in chemistry

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2024.06.012  

   Cossairt, Brandi M; Dempsey, Jillian L; Young, Elizabeth R; Roberts, Courtney C (August 2024, Trends in Chemistry)
2. Undergraduate women empowering women in computational chemistry: Three perspectives

   https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.26354  

   Evans, Rebecca; Perchik, Madison; Magee, Caroline; Cafiero, Mauricio (October 2020, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry)

   null (Ed.)
3. Women Make COMP: Mentoring the Next Generation of Women in Computational Chemistry

   https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00643  

   Palermo, Giulia; Armacost, Kira A.; Nagan, Maria C. (October 2019, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling)
4. Women in IEEE PELS: Learning From the Past, Defining the Future [Women in Engineering]

   https://doi.org/10.1109/MPEL.2021.3075789  

   Kim, Katherine A.; Kegley, Lauren E.; Watts Butler, Stephanie; Brandao de Freitas, Nayara; DiMarino, Christina (June 2021, IEEE Power Electronics Magazine)
5. Women and URM Experiences in Makerspaces

   https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--57467  

   De_Rosa, Alexander; Buckley, Jenni; Trauth, Amy (June 2025, ASEE Conferences)

   Academic makerspaces represent an ideal opportunity to present engineering students with active, experiential learning opportunities that reinforce theoretical concepts through conceptual design and prototyping. When appropriately supported, experiential learning in makerspaces has the capacity to drive development of technical skills and positive self-efficacy among novice engineers. However, research suggests that students who identify as part of historically underrepresented groups (i.e. those who are not White and male) can experience makerspaces in ways that marginalize their success. Thus, care must be taken in makerspace design and operation to create an environment that has a positive impact on the success of all students. In this study, we consider the perceptions and experiences of women and underrepresented racial/ethnic minorities (URMs) in an academic makerspace at one large, research intensive institution. We surveyed 256 undergraduate mechanical engineering students to compare and contrast their self-efficacy, their perceptions of makerspace support, and their peer-to-peer interactions. We found that student self-efficacy for conceptual design and prototyping did not differ by race or gender. However, females reported they were more likely to have a positive experience in the makerspace when supported by a teaching assistant who was also female. Students who identified as URM were significantly more likely to report discomfort in working with peers in the makerspace. We anticipate the outcomes of this study will provide implications for faculty and staff makerspaces at other postsecondary institutions who aim to build an inclusive and accessible learning environment for all students. 

   more » « less