Abstract Coccolithophores fix organic carbon and produce calcite plates (coccoliths) that ballast organic matter and facilitate carbon export. Photosynthesis consumes carbon dioxide, while calcification produces it, raising questions about whether coccolithophores are a net sink or source of carbon. We characterized the physiology of calcified and noncalcified (“naked”) phenotypes ofEmiliania huxleyi(CCMP374) and investigated the relationship between calcification and photosynthesis across a gradient of light (25–2000 μmol photons m−2 s−1) spanning the euphotic zone. Growth and photophysiological parameters increased with light until reaching a mid‐light (150 μmol photons m−2 s−1) maximum for both phenotypes. Calcified cells were characterized by enhanced photophysiology and less photoinhibition. Further, enhanced bicarbonate transport in calcified cells led to higher rates of particulate organic carbon fixation and growth compared to naked cells at mid‐light to high light (150–2000 μmol photons m−2 s−1). Coccolith production was similarly high at mid and high light, but the rate of coccolith shedding was >3‐fold lower at high‐light (1.2 vs. 0.35 coccoliths cell−1 h−1). The cellular mechanims(s) of this differential shedding remain unknown and underly light‐related controls on coccosphere maintenance. Our data suggest coccoliths shade cells at high light and that enhanced bicarbonate transport associated with calcification increases internal carbon supplies available for organic carbon fixation.
more »
« less
The Possession of Coccoliths Fails to Deter Microzooplankton Grazers
Phytoplankton play a central role in the regulation of global carbon and nutrient cycles, forming the basis of the marine food webs. A group of biogeochemically important phytoplankton, the coccolithophores, produce calcium carbonate scales that have been hypothesized to deter or reduce grazing by microzooplankton. Here, a meta-analysis of mesocosm-based experiments demonstrates that calcification of the cosmopolitan coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi , fails to deter microzooplankton grazing. The median grazing to growth ratio for E. huxleyi (0.56 ± 0.40) was not significantly different among non-calcified nano- or picoeukaryotes (0.71 ± 0.31 and 0.55 ± 0.34, respectively). Additionally, the environmental concentration of E. huxleyi did not drive preferential grazing of non-calcified groups. These results strongly suggest that the possession of coccoliths does not provide E. huxleyi effective protection from microzooplankton grazing. Such indiscriminate consumption has implications for the dissolution and fate of CaCO 3 in the ocean, and the evolution of coccoliths.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2021032
- PAR ID:
- 10350784
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Frontiers in Marine Science
- Volume:
- 7
- ISSN:
- 2296-7745
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing rates were measured from incubation experiments using the dilution method in the framework of the Northeast U.S. Shelf Long-Term Ecological Research project. The data set includes plankton population dynamics rates obtained during seasonal cruises along a north/south transect from Martha’s Vineyard to the shelf-break. Phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing rates were measured for the total phytoplankton community and for size fractions less than and greater than 10 µm. Phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing rates, the first trophic interaction between primary producers and higher trophic levels, are essential parameters to assess the cycling and export of carbon in the ocean and to better understand marine food webs.more » « less
-
Dam, Hans (Ed.)Abstract Grazing on phytoplankton by microzooplankton is a critical process in making energy available to higher trophic levels, shaping marine food webs, and biogeochemical cycling. Despite its key role, the drivers of grazing remain poorly constrained due to the concurrent influences of biotic and abiotic factors. To elucidate the impact of microzooplankton biomass and community composition on grazing rates, we measured ciliate and dinoflagellate biomass in boreal summer and winter from 2018-2023, at three stations spanning the Northeast US Shelf from coastal Rhode Island, USA to the shelf break. This record of microzooplankton biomass encompasses the seasonal and spatial variability from shore to shelf. Dinoflagellate biomass showed a clear seasonal shift from larger (>20 μm) cells in winter to smaller ones in summer, while ciliate biomass lacked seasonal trends. Anomalies in community composition coincided with disruptions in the typical seasonal phytoplankton size structure, suggesting that microzooplankton size structure was linked to the size of available prey. In winter, microzooplankton biomass was positively correlated with microzooplankton grazing, indicating that the mechanism moderating the planktonic food web structure changes seasonally. These results inform our understanding of planktonic food webs by identifying the linkage between grazing and seasonal changes in phytoplankton community structure that impact energy transfer to higher trophic levels.more » « less
-
Phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing rates were measured from incubation experiments using the dilution method in the framework of the Northeast U.S. Shelf Long-Term Ecological Research project. The data set includes plankton population dynamics rates obtained during 12 cruises from winter 2018 (EN608) to summer 2022 (EN687) along a north/south transect from Martha’s Vineyard to the shelf-break. Phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing rates were measured for the total phytoplankton community (chl-a concentrations) and for size fractions (chl-a size fractionation) less than and greater than 10 µm. Phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing rates, the first trophic interaction between primary producers and higher trophic levels, are essential parameters to assess the cycling and export of carbon in the ocean and to better understand marine food webs.more » « less
-
Abstract The significant contribution of phytoplankton to global primary production is regulated by several abiotic and biotic factors, which are often difficult to account for in natural systems. To address these challenges, we perturbed a summer plankton community from Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA, by manipulating the temperature and nutrient conditions in a controlled short‐term incubation experiment and tracked changes in phytoplankton community structure in response to fluctuations in phytoplankton physiology and microzooplankton grazing. Water was incubated at the in situ temperature (22°C) and at deviations from that temperature (± 4°C) with both macronutrient amendments (N, P, and Si addition) and unamended controls. We found nutrient availability and microzooplankton grazing to have pronounced and opposite impacts on phytoplankton size composition, with nutrient amendments shifting the phytoplankton community toward larger cells and grazing rates correlated with smaller phytoplankton communities and low‐nutrient conditions. Nutrient amendments also altered cellular elemental ratios by increasing chlorophyll : C. Conversely, temperature was not found to have a direct impact on size or elemental stoichiometry, but did influence community composition. These findings paralleled prior observations from lab and field studies in Narragansett Bay which together suggest that over shorter timescales, nutrient availability may have a greater impact on phytoplankton community composition than temperature or grazing, altering phytoplankton nutritional value for higher trophic levels and as a result, secondary production. Thus, understanding underlying nutrient dynamics will be necessary to decipher how short‐term changes in temperature or grazing may impact phytoplankton communities and the ecosystems they support.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

