Abstract Objective . Retinal implants have been developed to electrically stimulate healthy retinal neurons in the progressively degenerated retina. Several stimulation approaches have been proposed to improve the visual percept induced in patients with retinal prostheses. We introduce a computational model capable of simulating the effects of electrical stimulation on retinal neurons. Leveraging this computational platform, we delve into the underlying mechanisms influencing the sensitivity of retinal neurons’ response to various stimulus waveforms. Approach . We implemented a model of spiking bipolar cells (BCs) in the magnocellular pathway of the primate retina, diffuse BC subtypes (DB4), and utilized our multiscale admittance method (AM)-NEURON computational platform to characterize the response of BCs to epiretinal electrical stimulation with monophasic, symmetric, and asymmetric biphasic pulses. Main results . Our investigations yielded four notable results: (a) the latency of BCs increases as stimulation pulse duration lengthens; conversely, this latency decreases as the current amplitude increases. (b) Stimulation with a long anodic-first symmetric biphasic pulse (duration > 8 ms) results in a significant decrease in spiking threshold compared to stimulation with similar cathodic-first pulses (from 98.2 to 57.5 µ A). (c) The hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel was a prominent contributor to the reduced threshold of BCs in response to long anodic-first stimulus pulses. (d) Finally, extending the study to asymmetric waveforms, our results predict a lower BCs threshold using asymmetric long anodic-first pulses compared to that of asymmetric short cathodic-first stimulation. Significance . This study predicts the effects of several stimulation parameters on spiking BCs response to electrical stimulation. Of importance, our findings shed light on mechanisms underlying the experimental observations from the literature, thus highlighting the capability of the methodology to predict and guide the development of electrical stimulation protocols to generate a desired biological response, thereby constituting an ideal testbed for the development of electroceutical devices.
more »
« less
Modeling ON Cone Bipolar Cells for Electrical Stimulation
Retinal prosthetic systems have been developed to help blind patients suffering from retinal degenerative diseases gain some useful form of vision. Various experimental and computational studies have been performed to test electrical stimulation strategies that can improve the performance of these devices. Detailed computational models of retinal neurons, such as retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and bipolar cells (BCs), allow us to explore the mechanisms underlying the response of cells to electrical stimulation. While electrophysiological studies have shown the presence of voltage-gated ionic channels in different regions of BCs, many of the existing cone BCs models are assumed to be passive or only contain calcium channels at the synaptic terminals. We have utilized our Admittance Method (AM)-NEURON computational platform to implement a more realistic model of ON-BCs. Our model closely replicates the recent patch-clamp experiments directly measuring the response of ON-BCs to epiretinal electrical stimulation and thereby predicts the regional distributions of the ionic channels. Our computational results further indicate that outward potassium current strongly contributes to the depolarizing voltage transient of ON-BCs in response to electrical stimulation.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1933394
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10352635
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Modeling ON Cone Bipolar Cells for Electrical Stimulation
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 6547 to 6550
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Electrical stimulation of surviving retinal neurons has proven effective in restoring sight to totally blind patients affected by retinal degenerative diseases. Morphological and biophysical differences among retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are important factors affecting their response to epiretinal electrical stimulation. Although detailed models of ON and OFF RGCs have already been investigated, here we developed morphologically and biophysically realistic computational models of two classified RGCs, D1-bistratified and A2-monostratified, and analyzed their response to alternations in stimulation frequency (up to 200 Hz). Results show that the D1-bistratified cell is more responsive to high frequency stimulation compared to the A2-monostratified cell. This differential RGCs response suggests a potential avenue for selective activation, and in turn different encoded percept of RGCsmore » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract Objective . Patients with photovoltaic subretinal implant PRIMA demonstrated letter acuity ∼0.1 logMAR worse than sampling limit for 100μ m pixels (1.3 logMAR) and performed slower than healthy subjects tested with equivalently pixelated images. To explore the underlying differences between natural and prosthetic vision, we compare the fidelity of retinal response to visual and subretinal electrical stimulation through single-cell modeling and ensemble decoding.Approach . Responses of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to optical or electrical white noise stimulation in healthy and degenerate rat retinas were recorded via multi-electrode array. Each RGC was fit with linear–nonlinear and convolutional neural network models. To characterize RGC noise, we compared statistics of spike-triggered averages (STAs) in RGCs responding to electrical or visual stimulation of healthy and degenerate retinas. At the population level, we constructed a linear decoder to determine the accuracy of the ensemble of RGCs onN -way discrimination tasks.Main results . Although computational models can match natural visual responses well (correlation ∼0.6), they fit significantly worse to spike timings elicited by electrical stimulation of the healthy retina (correlation ∼0.15). In the degenerate retina, response to electrical stimulation is equally bad. The signal-to-noise ratio of electrical STAs in degenerate retinas matched that of the natural responses when 78 ± 6.5% of the spikes were replaced with random timing. However, the noise in RGC responses contributed minimally to errors in ensemble decoding. The determining factor in accuracy of decoding was the number of responding cells. To compensate for fewer responding cells under electrical stimulation than in natural vision, more presentations of the same stimulus are required to deliver sufficient information for image decoding.Significance . Slower-than-natural pattern identification by patients with the PRIMA implant may be explained by the lower number of electrically activated cells than in natural vision, which is compensated by a larger number of the stimulus presentations. -
more » « less
Abstract Epiretinal prostheses aim at electrically stimulating the inner most surviving retinal cells—retinal ganglion cells (RGCs)—to restore partial sight to the blind. Recent tests in patients with epiretinal implants have revealed that electrical stimulation of the retina results in the percept of color of the elicited phosphenes, which depends on the frequency of stimulation. This paper presents computational results that are predictive of this finding and further support our understanding of the mechanisms of color encoding in electrical stimulation of retina, which could prove pivotal for the design of advanced retinal prosthetics that elicit both percept and color. This provides, for the first time, a directly applicable “amplitude-frequency” stimulation strategy to “encode color” in future retinal prosthetics through a predictive computational tool to selectively target small bistratified cells, which have been shown to contribute to “blue-yellow” color opponency in the retinal circuitry. The presented results are validated with experimental data reported in the literature and correlated with findings in blind patients with a retinal prosthetic implant collected by our group.
-
Background: Recently, the in vitro blood–brain barrier (BBB) models derived from human pluripotent stem cells have been given extensive attention in therapeutics due to the implications they have with the health of the central nervous system. It is essential to create an accurate BBB model in vitro in order to better understand the properties of the BBB, and how it can respond to inflammatory stimulation and be passed by targeted or non-targeted cell therapeutics, more specifically extracellular vesicles. Methods: Brain-specific pericytes (iPCs) were differentiated from iPSK3 cells using dual SMAD signaling inhibitors and Wnt activation plus fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2). The derived cells were characterized by immunostaining, flow cytometry, and RT-PCR. In parallel, blood vessels organoids were derived using Wnt activation, BMP4, FGF2, VEGF, and SB431542. The organoids were replated and treated with retinoic acid to enhance the blood–brain barrier (BBB) features in the differentiated brain endothelial cells (iECs). Co-culture was performed for iPCs and iECs in the transwell system and 3D microfluidics channels. Results: The derived iPCs expressed common markers PDGFRb and NG2, and brain-specific genes FOXF2 , ABCC9 , KCNJ8 , and ZIC1 . The derived iECs expressed common endothelial cell markers CD31, VE-cadherin, and BBB-associated genes BRCP , GLUT-1 , PGP , ABCC1 , OCLN , and SLC2A1 . The co-culture of the two cell types responded to the stimulation of amyloid β42 oligomers by the upregulation of the expression of TNFa , IL6 , NFKB , Casp3 , SOD2 , and TP53 . The co-culture also showed the property of trans-endothelial electrical resistance. The proof of concept vascularization strategy was demonstrated in a 3D microfluidics-based device. Conclusion: The derived iPCs and iECs have brain-specific properties, and the co-culture of iPCs and iECs provides an in vitro BBB model that show inflammatory response. This study has significance in establishing micro-physiological systems for neurological disease modeling and drug screening.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629884
