For any simple polygon P we compute the optimal upper and lower angle bounds for triangulating P with Steiner points, and show that these bounds can be attained (except in one special case). The sharp angle bounds for an N -gon are computable in time O(N ), even though the number of triangles needed to attain these bounds has no bound in terms of N alone. In general, the sharp upper and lower bounds cannot both be attained by a single triangulation, although this does happen in some cases. Surprisingly, we prove the optimal angle bounds for polygonal triangulations are the same as for triangular dissections. The proof of this verifies, in a stronger form, a 1984 conjecture of Gerver.
more »
« less
Optimal angle bounds for Steiner triangulations of polygons
For any simple polygon P we compute the optimal upper and lower angle bounds for triangulating P with Steiner points, and show that these bounds can be attained (except in one special case). The sharp angle bounds for an N-gon are computable in time O(N), even though the number of triangles needed to attain these bounds has no bound in terms of N alone. In general, the sharp upper and lower bounds cannot both be attained by a single triangulation, although this does happen in some cases. For example, we show that any polygon with minimal interior angle θ has a triangulation with all angles in the interval I = [θ, 90°–min(36°, θ)/2], and for θ ≤ 36° both bounds are best possible. Surprisingly, we prove the optimal angle bounds for polygonal triangulations are the same as for triangular dissections. The proof of this verifies, in a stronger form, a 1984 conjecture of Gerver.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1906259
- PAR ID:
- 10353528
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the 2022 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA)
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 3127-3143
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Guruswami, Venkatesan (Ed.)Inspired by the classic problem of Boolean function monotonicity testing, we investigate the testability of other well-studied properties of combinatorial finite set systems, specifically intersecting families and union-closed families. A function f: {0,1}ⁿ → {0,1} is intersecting (respectively, union-closed) if its set of satisfying assignments corresponds to an intersecting family (respectively, a union-closed family) of subsets of [n]. Our main results are that - in sharp contrast with the property of being a monotone set system - the property of being an intersecting set system, and the property of being a union-closed set system, both turn out to be information-theoretically difficult to test. We show that: - For ε ≥ Ω(1/√n), any non-adaptive two-sided ε-tester for intersectingness must make 2^{Ω(n^{1/4}/√{ε})} queries. We also give a 2^{Ω(√{n log(1/ε)})}-query lower bound for non-adaptive one-sided ε-testers for intersectingness. - For ε ≥ 1/2^{Ω(n^{0.49})}, any non-adaptive two-sided ε-tester for union-closedness must make n^{Ω(log(1/ε))} queries. Thus, neither intersectingness nor union-closedness shares the poly(n,1/ε)-query non-adaptive testability that is enjoyed by monotonicity. To complement our lower bounds, we also give a simple poly(n^{√{nlog(1/ε)}},1/ε)-query, one-sided, non-adaptive algorithm for ε-testing each of these properties (intersectingness and union-closedness). We thus achieve nearly tight upper and lower bounds for two-sided testing of intersectingness when ε = Θ(1/√n), and for one-sided testing of intersectingness when ε = Θ(1).more » « less
-
We develop a general framework, called approximately-diverse dynamic programming (ADDP) that can be used to generate a collection of k≥2 maximally diverse solutions to various geometric and combinatorial optimization problems. Given an approximation factor 0≤c≤1, this framework also allows for maximizing diversity in the larger space of c-approximate solutions. We focus on two geometric problems to showcase this technique: 1. Given a polygon P, an integer k≥2 and a value c≤1, generate k maximally diverse c-nice triangulations of P. Here, a c-nice triangulation is one that is c-approximately optimal with respect to a given quality measure σ. 2. Given a planar graph G, an integer k≥2 and a value c≤1, generate k maximally diverse c-optimal Independent Sets (or, Vertex Covers). Here, an independent set S is said to be c-optimal if |S|≥c|S′| for any independent set S′ of G. Given a set of k solutions to the above problems, the diversity measure we focus on is the average distance between the solutions, where d(X,Y)=|XΔY|. For arbitrary polygons and a wide range of quality measures, we give poly(n,k) time (1−Θ(1/k))-approximation algorithms for the diverse triangulation problem. For the diverse independent set and vertex cover problems on planar graphs, we give an algorithm that runs in time 2^(O(k.δ^(−1).ϵ^(−2)).n^O(1/ϵ) and returns (1−ϵ)-approximately diverse (1−δ)c-optimal independent sets or vertex covers. Our triangulation results are the first algorithmic results on computing collections of diverse geometric objects, and our planar graph results are the first PTAS for the diverse versions of any NP-complete problem. Additionally, we also provide applications of this technique to diverse variants of other geometric problems.more » « less
-
Guruswami, Venkatesan (Ed.)Given the need for ever higher performance, and the failure of CPUs to keep providing single-threaded performance gains, engineers are increasingly turning to highly-parallel custom VLSI chips to implement expensive computations. In VLSI design, the gates and wires of a logical circuit are placed on a 2-dimensional chip with a small number of layers. Traditional VLSI models use gate delay to measure the time complexity of the chip, ignoring the lengths of wires. However, as technology has advanced, wire delay is no longer negligible; it has become an important measure in the design of VLSI chips [Markov, Nature (2014)]. Motivated by this situation, we define and study a model for VLSI chips, called wire-delay VLSI, which takes wire delay into account, going beyond an earlier model of Chazelle and Monier [JACM 1985]. - We prove nearly tight upper bounds and lower bounds (up to logarithmic factors) on the time delay of this chip model for several basic problems. For example, And, Or and Parity require Θ(n^{1/3}) delay, while Addition and Multiplication require ̃ Θ(n^{1/2}) delay, and Triangle Detection on (dense) n-node graphs requires ̃ Θ(n) delay. Interestingly, when we allow input bits to be read twice, the delay for Addition can be improved to Θ(n^{1/3}). - We also show that proving significantly higher lower bounds in our wire-delay VLSI model would imply breakthrough results in circuit lower bounds. Motivated by this barrier, we also study conditional lower bounds on the delay of chips based on the Orthogonal Vectors Hypothesis from fine-grained complexity.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

