Peacor, Scott D., Dorn, Nathan J., Smith, Justine A., Peckham, Nicole E., Cherry, Michael J., Sheriff, Michael J., and Kimbro, David L. A skewed literature: Few studies evaluate the contribution of predation‐risk effects to natural field patterns. Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10354805. Ecology Letters 25.9 Web. doi:10.1111/ele.14075.

Peacor, Scott D., Dorn, Nathan J., Smith, Justine A., Peckham, Nicole E., Cherry, Michael J., Sheriff, Michael J., & Kimbro, David L. A skewed literature: Few studies evaluate the contribution of predation‐risk effects to natural field patterns. Ecology Letters, 25 (9). Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10354805. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14075

Peacor, Scott D., Dorn, Nathan J., Smith, Justine A., Peckham, Nicole E., Cherry, Michael J., Sheriff, Michael J., and Kimbro, David L. "A skewed literature: Few studies evaluate the contribution of predation‐risk effects to natural field patterns". Ecology Letters 25 (9). Country unknown/Code not available. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14075. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10354805.

@article{osti_10354805,
place = {Country unknown/Code not available}, title = {A skewed literature: Few studies evaluate the contribution of predation‐risk effects to natural field patterns}, url = {https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10354805}, DOI = {10.1111/ele.14075}, abstractNote = {}, journal = {Ecology Letters}, volume = {25}, number = {9}, author = {Peacor, Scott D. and Dorn, Nathan J. and Smith, Justine A. and Peckham, Nicole E. and Cherry, Michael J. and Sheriff, Michael J. and Kimbro, David L.}, }