More Like this

1. Neural Networks can Learn Representations with Gradient Descent

   Damian, Alex ; Lee, Jason ; Soltanolkotabi, Mahdi ( January 2022 , Advances in neural information processing systems)

   Significant theoretical work has established that in specific regimes, neural networks trained by gradient descent behave like kernel methods. However, in practice, it is known that neural networks strongly outperform their associated kernels. In this work, we explain this gap by demonstrating that there is a large class of functions which cannot be efficiently learned by kernel methods but can be easily learned with gradient descent on a two layer neural network outside the kernel regime by learning representations that are relevant to the target task. We also demonstrate that these representations allow for efficient transfer learning, which is impossible in the kernel regime. Specifically, we consider the problem of learning polynomials which depend on only a few relevant directions, i.e. of the form $f(x)=g(Ux)$ where $U: \R^d \to \R^r$ with $d≫r$. When the degree of f⋆ is p, it is known that n≍dp samples are necessary to learn f⋆ in the kernel regime. Our primary result is that gradient descent learns a representation of the data which depends only on the directions relevant to f. This results in an improved sample complexity of n≍d2r+drp. Furthermore, in a transfer learning setup where the data distributions in the source and targetmore »domain share the same representation U but have different polynomial heads we show that a popular heuristic for transfer learning has a target sample complexity independent of d.« less
2. What Can the Neural Tangent Kernel Tell Us About Adversarial Robustness?

   Tsilivis, Nikolaos ; Kempe, Julia ( October 2022 , NeurIPS)

   The adversarial vulnerability of neural nets, and subsequent techniques to create robust models have attracted significant attention; yet we still lack a full understanding of this phenomenon. Here, we study adversarial examples of trained neural networks through analytical tools afforded by recent theory advances connecting neural networks and kernel methods, namely the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK), following a growing body of work that leverages the NTK approximation to successfully analyze important deep learning phenomena and design algorithms for new applications. We show how NTKs allow to generate adversarial examples in a ``training-free'' fashion, and demonstrate that they transfer to fool their finite-width neural net counterparts in the ``lazy'' regime. We leverage this connection to provide an alternative view on robust and non-robust features, which have been suggested to underlie the adversarial brittleness of neural nets. Specifically, we define and study features induced by the eigendecomposition of the kernel to better understand the role of robust and non-robust features, the reliance on both for standard classification and the robustness-accuracy trade-off. We find that such features are surprisingly consistent across architectures, and that robust features tend to correspond to the largest eigenvalues of the model, and thus are learned early during training.more »Our framework allows us to identify and visualize non-robust yet useful features. Finally, we shed light on the robustness mechanism underlying adversarial training of neural nets used in practice: quantifying the evolution of the associated empirical NTK, we demonstrate that its dynamics falls much earlier into the ``lazy'' regime and manifests a much stronger form of the well known bias to prioritize learning features within the top eigenspaces of the kernel, compared to standard training.« less
3. Generalization Guarantees for Neural Architecture Search with Train-Validation Split

   Oymak, Samet ; Li, Mingchen ; Soltanolkotabi, Mahdi ( July 2021 , International Conference on Machine Learning)

   Neural Architecture Search (NAS) is a popular method for automatically designing optimized architectures for high-performance deep learning. In this approach, it is common to use bilevel optimization where one optimizes the model weights over the training data (lower-level problem) and various hyperparameters such as the configuration of the architecture over the validation data (upper-level problem). This paper explores the statistical aspects of such problems with train-validation splits. In practice, the lower-level problem is often overparameterized and can easily achieve zero loss. Thus, a-priori it seems impossible to distinguish the right hyperparameters based on training loss alone which motivates a better understanding of the role of train-validation split. To this aim this work establishes the following results: • We show that refined properties of the validation loss such as risk and hyper-gradients are indicative of those of the true test loss. This reveals that the upper-level problem helps select the most generalizable model and prevent overfitting with a near-minimal validation sample size. Importantly, this is established for continuous spaces – which are highly relevant for popular differentiable search schemes. • We establish generalization bounds for NAS problems with an emphasis on an activation search problem. When optimized with gradient-descent, we showmore »that the train-validation procedure returns the best (model, architecture) pair even if all architectures can perfectly fit the training data to achieve zero error. • Finally, we highlight rigorous connections between NAS, multiple kernel learning, and low-rank matrix learning. The latter leads to novel algorithmic insights where the solution of the upper problem can be accurately learned via efficient spectral methods to achieve near-minimal risk.« less
4. Generalization Guarantees for Neural Architecture Search with Train-Validation Split

   Oymak, Samet ; Li, Mingchen ; Soltanolkotabi, Mahdi ( January 2021 , ICML 2021)

   Neural Architecture Search (NAS) is a popular method for automatically designing optimized architectures for high-performance deep learning. In this approach, it is common to use bilevel optimization where one optimizes the model weights over the training data (lower-level problem) and various hyperparameters such as the configuration of the architecture over the validation data (upper-level problem). This paper explores the statistical aspects of such problems with train-validation splits. In practice, the lower-level problem is often overparameterized and can easily achieve zero loss. Thus, a-priori it seems impossible to distinguish the right hyperparameters based on training loss alone which motivates a better understanding of the role of train-validation split. To this aim this work establishes the following results: • We show that refined properties of the validation loss such as risk and hyper-gradients are indicative of those of the true test loss. This reveals that the upper-level problem helps select the most generalizable model and prevent overfitting with a near-minimal validation sample size. Importantly, this is established for continuous spaces – which are highly relevant for popular differentiable search schemes. • We establish generalization bounds for NAS problems with an emphasis on an activation search problem. When optimized with gradient-descent, we showmore »that the train-validation procedure returns the best (model, architecture) pair even if all architectures can perfectly fit the training data to achieve zero error. • Finally, we highlight rigorous connections between NAS, multiple kernel learning, and low-rank matrix learning. The latter leads to novel algorithmic insights where the solution of the upper problem can be accurately learned via efficient spectral methods to achieve near-minimal risk.« less
5. Continuous Time Analysis of Momentum Methods

   Kovachki, Nikola ; Stuart, Andrew M. ( January 2021 , Journal of machine learning research)

   Gradient descent-based optimization methods underpin the parameter training of neural networks, and hence comprise a significant component in the impressive test results found in a number of applications. Introducing stochasticity is key to their success in practical problems, and there is some understanding of the role of stochastic gradient descent in this context. Momentum modifications of gradient descent such as Polyak’s Heavy Ball method (HB) and Nesterov’s method of accelerated gradients (NAG), are also widely adopted. In this work our focus is on understanding the role of momentum in the training of neural networks, concentrating on the common situation in which the momentum contribution is fixed at each step of the algorithm. To expose the ideas simply we work in the deterministic setting. Our approach is to derive continuous time approximations of the discrete algorithms; these continuous time approximations provide insights into the mechanisms at play within the discrete algorithms. We prove three such approximations. Firstly we show that standard implementations of fixed momentum methods approximate a time-rescaled gradient descent flow, asymptotically as the learning rate shrinks to zero; this result does not distinguish momentum methods from pure gradient descent, in the limit of vanishing learning rate. We then proceedmore »to prove two results aimed at understanding the observed practical advantages of fixed momentum methods over gradient descent, when implemented in the non-asymptotic regime with fixed small, but non-zero, learning rate. We achieve this by proving approximations to continuous time limits in which the small but fixed learning rate appears as a parameter; this is known as the method of modified equations in the numerical analysis literature, recently rediscovered as the high resolution ODE approximation in the machine learning context. In our second result we show that the momentum method is approximated by a continuous time gradient flow, with an additional momentum-dependent second order time-derivative correction, proportional to the learning rate; this may be used to explain the stabilizing effect of momentum algorithms in their transient phase. Furthermore in a third result we show that the momentum methods admit an exponentially attractive invariant manifold on which the dynamics reduces, approximately, to a gradient flow with respect to a modified loss function, equal to the original loss function plus a small perturbation proportional to the learning rate; this small correction provides convexification of the loss function and encodes additional robustness present in momentum methods, beyond the transient phase.« less