<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Comparative Analysis of the Chloroplast Genomes of &lt;i&gt;Quercus × morehus&lt;/i&gt; and the Presumptive Parents &lt;i&gt;Q. wislizeni&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Q. kelloggii&lt;/i&gt; (Fagaceae) from California</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher></publisher>
				<date>07/21/2022</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10357088</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.1128/mra.00321-22</idno>
					<title level='j'>Microbiology Resource Announcements</title>
<idno>2576-098X</idno>
<biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope>					

					<author>Alejandro Garcia</author><author>Althea C. Katada</author><author>Alyssa Serrano</author><author>Adrea Gonzalez-Karlsson</author><author>Angel Carrillo</author><author>Angelica Castellanos</author><author>Azucena Mendez-Gomez</author><author>Carlos J. Flores</author><author>Christopher Limon</author><author>Cynthia Lopez</author><author>Daniela Rosas-Uribe</author><author>Dylan J. Hidalgo</author><author>Ephraim C. Melgarejo</author><author>Erica L. Estamo</author><author>Faith Mora</author><author>Gabino Guzman</author><author>Jason F. Morones</author><author>Jeffery R. Hughey</author><author>Jennifer Sanchez-Mendoza</author><author>Jimena M. Parra</author><author>Joaquin Perez</author><author>Joe H. Perez</author><author>Joel Viorato Arambula</author><author>Juan S. Chavez</author><author>Juan R. Figueroa</author><author>Juan Rodriguez</author><author>Kevin Cardenas</author><author>Leslie Trejo</author><author>Lizbeth D. Lozano-Ruiz</author><author>Loreli Gonzalez</author><author>Lorena L. Vargas</author><author>Marc Anthony Trujillo</author><author>Mariana Rangel</author><author>Martin R. Delgado</author><author>Mayra A. Ibarra-Moreno</author><author>Nancy Chitica Villalobos</author><author>Priscila Corona</author><author>Quinn Snowden</author><author>Roberto Vargas</author><author>Robin B. Staretorp</author><author>Stephanie Martin</author><author>Victor M. Zavala</author><author>Jason E. Stajich</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[ABSTRACT                          Here, we present the complete chloroplast genomes of              Quercus × morehus              ,              Q. wislizeni              , and              Q. kelloggii              from California. The genomes are 161,119 to 161,130bp and encode 132 genes.              Quercus × morehus              and              Q. wislizeni              are identical in sequence but differ from              Q. kelloggii              by three indels and eight SNPs.]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><p>Q uercus morehus Kellogg, Abram's oak, was originally proposed from a single speci- men from near Clear Lake, CA <ref type="bibr">(1)</ref>. It was described as a small tree (9.14 m) with black bark, oblong-lanceolate leaves, and oblong nuts. Greene <ref type="bibr">(2)</ref> was the first to study Q. morehus and concluded it was a hybrid between the interior live oak Q. wislizeni A. DC. and the black oak Q. kelloggii Newb. Subsequent authors agreed with this hypothesis, including Jepson who itemized six observations supporting the hybrid conclusion <ref type="bibr">(3)</ref><ref type="bibr">(4)</ref><ref type="bibr">(5)</ref><ref type="bibr">(6)</ref><ref type="bibr">(7)</ref>. Many oak chloroplast genomes have been sequenced to date (8-10); however, the genomes of Quercus &#194; morehus, Q. wislizeni, and Q. kelloggii have not been analyzed. To contribute to the bioinformatics of Quercus &#194; morehus and these closely related Quercus species, we assembled and characterized the complete chloroplast genomes of the presumptive hybrid and parents.</p><p>The leaves of three adjacent specimens were collected in Groveland, California (37&#176;51'22.2N 120&#176;13936.9W) and deposited at Hartnell College under voucher numbers HCC 268 to 270. The DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen) following two modifications: the binding step was centrifuged at 4,000 g for 3 min and the DNA was eluted after incubation for 7 min in 40 mL TAE <ref type="bibr">(11)</ref>. The 150 bp PE library was constructed with the NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep kit (New England BioLabs) and sequenced by Novogene on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000. The analysis yielded 40,590,890 (Quercus &#194; morehus), 17,672,202 (Q. wislizeni), and 14,854,920 (Q. kelloggii) reads. The adapters and low quality reads were removed using the Trim Adapters and Trim Low Quality default settings with the BBDuk plugin in Geneious Prime 2019.1.3 (Biomatters Limited). The genomes were assembled by mapping reads onto the reference sequence of Q. agrifolia N&#233;e var. agrifolia, GenBank accession number OK634019 (12) using the Medium Sensitivity/Fast setting in Geneious Prime. The mapping coverage for Quercus &#194; morehus was 4,323&#194;, Q. wislizeni 1,547&#194;, and Q. kelloggii 1,885&#194;. The gaps were closed by iterative mapping using the same settings in Geneious Prime. The annotation was performed using the default settings in GeSeq (13), followed by manual adjustments according to NCBI ORFfinder and Sequin 15.5 <ref type="bibr">(14)</ref>.</p><p>The complete chloroplast genomes of Quercus &#194; morehus, Q. wislizeni, and Q. kelloggii were 161,130, 161,130, and 161,119 bp in length, respectively, and displayed the characteristic flowering plant quadripartite structure <ref type="bibr">(15)</ref>. Gene content and organization of the three genomes are identical to other oaks classified in section Lobatae <ref type="bibr">(8,</ref><ref type="bibr">10,</ref><ref type="bibr">12,</ref><ref type="bibr">16)</ref>. The three genomes showed a GC content of 37.0% and contained 132 genes, including 87 protein-coding, 37 tRNA, 8 rRNA genes (Fig. <ref type="figure">1</ref>). The chloroplast genomes of Quercus &#194; morehus and Q. wislizeni were identical in sequence but differed from Q. kelloggii by three indels and eight SNPs (five were located in noncoding and  <ref type="formula">14</ref>), and mapped with CHLOROPLOT <ref type="bibr">(17)</ref>. The innermost ring identifies the LSC, SSC, and the two inverted repeats. The numbers before the forward slash correspond to Quercus &#194; morehus and Q. wislizeni, and the numbers after the slash represent Q. kelloggii. The next ring displays the GC content and direction of transcription, as indicated by the two arrows. The final ring shows the genes. Genes transcribed clockwise are on the inside, while counterclockwise transcriptions are on the outside the circle. The color coding corresponds to genes of different groups as listed in the key in the bottom left. three in coding regions). Two of the three coding mutations were silent; however, the third altered the stop codon of the ndhF gene by 18 bp in Quercus &#194; morehus and Q. wislizeni.</p><p>Data availability. The complete chloroplast genome sequences of Quercus &#194; morehus, Q. wislizeni, and Q. kelloggii are available in GenBank under accession numbers OM541585, OM541583, and OM541584. The Illumina sequencing data for all three specimens are available under BioProject PRJNA818320. The reference genome for the annotation was Q. agrifolia var. agrifolia (GenBank accession number OK634019).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>ACKNOWLEDGMENT</head><p>This research was supported by NSF award number 1832446 to Hartnell College.</p></div><note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_0"><p>July 2022 Volume 11 Issue 7 10.1128/mra.00321-22</p></note>
			<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_1"><p>Downloaded from https://journals.asm.org/journal/mra on 23 September 2022 by 47.35.4.151.</p></note>
		</body>
		</text>
</TEI>
