Resonant tunneling diodes (RTDs) have come full-circle in the past 10 years after their demonstration in the early 1990s
as the fastest room-temperature semiconductor oscillator, displaying experimental results up to 712 GHz and fmax values
exceeding 1.0 THz [1]. Now the RTD is once again the preeminent electronic oscillator above 1.0 THz and is being
implemented as a coherent source [2] and a self-oscillating mixer [3], amongst other applications. This paper concerns
RTD electroluminescence – an effect that has been studied very little in the past 30+ years of RTD development, and not
at room temperature. We present experiments and modeling of an n-type In0.53Ga0.47As/AlAs double-barrier RTD
operating as a cross-gap light emitter at ~300K. The MBE-growth stack is shown in Fig. 1(a). A 15-μm-diam-mesa
device was defined by standard planar processing including a top annular ohmic contact with a 5-μm-diam pinhole in the
center to couple out enough of the internal emission for accurate free-space power measurements [4]. The emission spectra
have the behavior displayed in Fig. 1(b), parameterized by bias voltage (VB). The long wavelength emission edge is at
= 1684 nm - close to the In0.53Ga0.47As bandgap energy of Ug ≈ 0.75 eV at 300 K. The spectral peaks for VB = 2.8 and
3.0 V both occur around = 1550 nm (h = 0.75 eV), so blue-shifted relative to the peak of the “ideal”, bulk InGaAs
emission spectrum shown in Fig. 1(b) [5]. These results are consistent with the model displayed in Fig. 1(c), whereby
the broad emission peak is attributed to the radiative recombination between electrons accumulated on the emitter side,
and holes generated on the emitter side by interband tunneling with current density Jinter. The blue-shifted main peak is
attributed to the quantum-size effect on the emitter side, which creates a radiative recombination rate RN,2 comparable to
the band-edge cross-gap rate RN,1. Further support for this model is provided by the shorter wavelength and weaker
emission peak shown in Fig. 1(b) around = 1148 nm. Our quantum mechanical calculations attribute this to radiative
recombination RR,3 in the RTD quantum well between the electron ground-state level E1,e, and the hole level E1,h.
To further test the model and estimate quantum efficiencies, we conducted optical power measurements using a
large-area Ge photodiode located ≈3 mm away from the RTD pinhole, and having spectral response between 800 and
1800 nm with a peak responsivity of ≈0.85 A/W at =1550 nm. Simultaneous I-V and L-V plots were obtained and
are plotted in Fig. 2(a) with positive bias on the top contact (emitter on the bottom). The I-V curve displays a pronounced
NDR region having a current peak-to-valley current ratio of 10.7 (typical for In0.53Ga0.47As RTDs). The external quantum
efficiency (EQE) was calculated from EQE = e∙IP/(∙IE∙h) where IP is the photodiode dc current and IE the RTD current.
The plot of EQE is shown in Fig. 2(b) where we see a very rapid rise with VB, but a maximum value (at VB= 3.0 V) of
only ≈2×10-5. To extract the internal quantum efficiency (IQE), we use the expression EQE= c ∙i ∙r ≡ c∙IQE where
ci, and r are the optical-coupling, electrical-injection, and radiative recombination efficiencies, respectively [6]. Our
separate optical calculations yield c≈3.4×10-4 (limited primarily by the small pinhole) from which we obtain the curve
of IQE plotted in Fig. 2(b) (right-hand scale). The maximum value of IQE (again at VB = 3.0 V) is 6.0%. From the implicit
definition of IQE in terms of i and r given above, and the fact that the recombination efficiency in In0.53Ga0.47As is
likely limited by Auger scattering, this result for IQE suggests that i might be significantly high.
To estimate i, we have used the experimental total current of Fig. 2(a), the Kane two-band model of interband
tunneling [7] computed in conjunction with a solution to Poisson’s equation across the entire structure, and a rate-equation
model of Auger recombination on the emitter side [6] assuming a free-electron density of 2×1018 cm3. We focus on the
high-bias regime above VB = 2.5 V of Fig. 2(a) where most of the interband tunneling should occur in the depletion region
on the collector side [Jinter,2 in Fig. 1(c)]. And because of the high-quality of the InGaAs/AlAs heterostructure (very few
traps or deep levels), most of the holes should reach the emitter side by some combination of drift, diffusion, and tunneling
through the valence-band double barriers (Type-I offset) between InGaAs and AlAs. The computed interband current
density Jinter is shown in Fig. 3(a) along with the total current density Jtot. At the maximum Jinter (at VB=3.0 V) of 7.4×102
A/cm2, we get i = Jinter/Jtot = 0.18, which is surprisingly high considering there is no p-type doping in the device. When
combined with the Auger-limited r of 0.41 and c ≈ 3.4×10-4, we find a model value of IQE = 7.4% in good agreement
with experiment. This leads to the model values for EQE plotted in Fig. 2(b) - also in good agreement with experiment.
Finally, we address the high Jinter and consider a possible universal nature of the light-emission mechanism. Fig.
3(b) shows the tunneling probability T according to the Kane two-band model in the three materials, In0.53Ga0.47As, GaAs,
and GaN, following our observation of a similar electroluminescence mechanism in GaN/AlN RTDs (due to strong
polarization field of wurtzite structures) [8]. The expression is Tinter = (2/9)∙exp[(-2 ∙Ug
2 ∙me)/(2h∙P∙E)], where Ug is the
bandgap energy, P is the valence-to-conduction-band momentum matrix element, and E is the electric field. Values for
the highest calculated internal E fields for the InGaAs and GaN are also shown, indicating that Tinter in those structures
approaches values of ~10-5. As shown, a GaAs RTD would require an internal field of ~6×105 V/cm, which is rarely
realized in standard GaAs RTDs, perhaps explaining why there have been few if any reports of room-temperature
electroluminescence in the GaAs devices.
[1] E.R. Brown,et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 58, 2291, 1991. [5] S. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd Ed. 12.2.1 (Wiley, 1981).
[2] M. Feiginov et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., 99, 233506, 2011. [6] L. Coldren, Diode Lasers and Photonic Integrated Circuits, (Wiley, 1995).
[3] Y. Nishida et al., Nature Sci. Reports, 9, 18125, 2019. [7] E.O. Kane, J. of Appl. Phy 32, 83 (1961).
[4] P. Fakhimi, et al., 2019 DRC Conference Digest. [8] T. Growden, et al., Nature Light: Science & Applications 7, 17150 (2018).
[5] S. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd Ed. 12.2.1 (Wiley, 1981).
[6] L. Coldren, Diode Lasers and Photonic Integrated Circuits, (Wiley, 1995).
[7] E.O. Kane, J. of Appl. Phy 32, 83 (1961).
[8] T. Growden, et al., Nature Light: Science & Applications 7, 17150 (2018).
more »
« less
Ultralight dark matter detection with mechanical quantum sensors
We consider the use of quantum-limited mechanical force sensors to detect ultralight (sub-meV) dark matter (DM) candidates which are weakly coupled to the standard model. We show that mechanical sensors with masses around or below the milligram scale, operating around the standard quantum limit, would enable novel searches for DM with natural frequencies around the kHz scale. This would complement existing strategies based on torsion balances, atom interferometers, and atomic clock systems.
more » « less- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10362351
- Publisher / Repository:
- IOP Publishing
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- New Journal of Physics
- Volume:
- 23
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 1367-2630
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- Article No. 023041
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Optomechanical systems have been exploited in ultrasensitive measurements of force, acceleration and magnetic fields. The fundamental limits for optomechanical sensing have been extensively studied and now well understood—the intrinsic uncertainties of the bosonic optical and mechanical modes, together with backaction noise arising from interactions between the two, dictate the standard quantum limit. Advanced techniques based on non-classical probes, in situ ponderomotive squeezed light and backaction-evading measurements have been developed to overcome the standard quantum limit for individual optomechanical sensors. An alternative, conceptually simpler approach to enhance optomechanical sensing rests on joint measurements taken by multiple sensors. In this configuration, a pathway to overcome the fundamental limits in joint measurements has not been explored. Here we demonstrate that joint force measurements taken with entangled probes on multiple optomechanical sensors can improve the bandwidth in the thermal-noise-dominant regime or the sensitivity in the shot-noise-dominant regime. Moreover, we quantify the overall performance of entangled probes with the sensitivity–bandwidth product and observe a 25% increase compared with that of classical probes. The demonstrated entanglement-enhanced optomechanical sensors would enable new capabilities for inertial navigation, acoustic imaging and searches for new physics.more » « less
-
more » « less
ABSTRACT The Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal galaxy (Sgr) is investigated as a target for dark matter (DM) annihilation searches utilizing J-factor distributions calculated directly from a high-resolution hydrodynamic simulation of the infall and tidal disruption of Sgr around the Milky Way. In contrast to past studies, the simulation incorporates DM, stellar and gaseous components for both the Milky Way and the Sgr progenitor galaxy. The simulated distributions account for significant tidal disruption affecting the DM density profile. Our estimate of the J-factor value for Sgr, JSgr = 1.48 × 1010 M$_\odot ^2$ kpc−5 (6.46 × 1016 GeV cm−5), is significantly lower than found in prior studies. This value, while formally a lower limit, is likely close to the true J-factor value for Sgr. It implies a DM cross-section incompatibly large in comparison with existing constraints would be required to attribute recently observed gamma-ray emission from Sgr to DM annihilation. We also calculate a J-factor value using a NFW profile fitted to the simulated DM density distribution to facilitate comparison with past studies. This NFW J-factor value supports the conclusion that most past studies have overestimated the dark matter density of Sgr on small scales. This, together with the fact that the Sgr has recently been shown to emit gamma-rays of astrophysical origin, complicate the use of Sgr in indirect DM detection searches.
-
more » « less
Abstract Background Insecticide resistance remains a major public health problem. Resistance surveillance is critical for effective vector control and resistance management planning. Commonly used insecticide susceptibility bioassays for mosquitoes are the CDC bottle bioassay and the WHO tube test. Less commonly used in the field but considered the gold standard for assessing insecticide susceptibility in the development of novel insecticides is the topical application bioassay. Each of these bioassays has critical differences in how they assess insecticide susceptibility that impacts their ability to differentiate between resistant and susceptible populations or determine different levels of resistance intensity.
Methods We compared the CDC bottle bioassay, the WHO tube test, and the topical application bioassay in establishing the dose–response against deltamethrin (DM) using the DM-resistant
Aedes aegypti strain MC1. Mosquitoes were exposed to a range of insecticide concentrations to establish a dose–response curve and assess variation around model predictions. In addition, 10 replicates of 20–25 mosquitoes were exposed to a fixed dose with intermediate mortality to assess the degree of variation in mortality.Results The topical application bioassay exhibited the lowest amount of variation in the dose–response data, followed by the WHO tube test. The CDC bottle bioassay had the highest level of variation. In the fixed-dose experiment, a higher variance was similarly found for the CDC bottle bioassay compared with the WHO tube test and topical application bioassay.
Conclusion These data suggest that the CDC bottle bioassay has the lowest power and the topical application bioassay the highest power to differentiate between resistant and susceptible populations and assess changes over time and between populations. This observation has significant implications for the interpretation of surveillance results from different assays. Ultimately, it will be important to discuss optimal insecticide resistance surveillance tools in terms of the surveillance objective, practicality in the field, and accuracy of the tool to reach that objective.
Graphical Abstract -
more » « less
The optical lever is a centuries old and widely used detection technique employed in applications ranging from consumer products and industrial sensors to precision force microscopes used in scientific research. However, despite the long history, its quantum limits have yet to be explored. In general, any precision optical measurement is accompanied by optical force induced disturbance to the measured object (termed as back action) leading to a standard quantum limit (SQL). Here, we give a simple ray optics description of how such back action can be evaded in optical lever detection. We perform a proof-of-principle experiment demonstrating the mechanism of back action evasion in the classical regime, by developing a lens system that cancels extra tilting of the reflected light off a silicon nitride membrane mechanical resonator caused by laser-pointing-noise-induced optical torques. We achieve a readout noise floor two orders of magnitude lower than the SQL, corresponding to an effective optomechanical cooperativity of 100 without the need for an optical cavity. As the state-of-the-art ultralow dissipation optomechanical systems relevant for quantum sensing are rapidly approaching the level where quantum noise dominates, simple and widely applicable back action evading protocols will be crucial for pushing beyond quantum limits.
