Large dams degrade the river’s health by heavily regulating the natural flows. Despite a long history of research on flow regulation due to dams, most studies focused only on the impact of a single dam and ignored the combined impact of flow regulation on a river network. We propose a new Dynamic Flow Alteration Index (DFAI) to quantify the local and cumulative degree of regulation by comparing the observed controlled flows with the naturalized flows based on a moving time horizon for the highly regulated Colorado River Basin. The proposed DFAI matches closely to dam’s localized regulation for headwater gages and starts to diverge as we move downstream due to increase in cumulative impact of the dams. DFAI considers the impact of dam operations on flow characteristics such as shifting of peak flow occurrence and dampening of peak flows. DFAI estimates the degree of regulation to be small for upstream dams and finds the maximum network regulation to be 2.52 years at Glen Canyon reservoir. DFAI also successfully captures the reduction in cumulative regulation when dam operations (e.g., Hoover Dam) bring the altered flow in synchronization with natural regime due to downstream flow requirements. The impact of San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program is also captured by DFAI as the reduction in network regulation drops by 1.5 years for Navajo Dam. Our findings using DFAI suggest the need to develop naturalized flows for major river basins to quantify the flow alteration under continually changing climate and human influences.
Sediment transfer, or connectivity, by aeolian processes between channel-proximal and upland deposits in river valleys is important for the maintenance of river corridor biophysical characteristics. In regulated river systems, dams control the magnitude and duration of discharge. Alterations to the flow regime driven by dams that increase the inundation duration of sediment, or which drive the encroachment of vegetation into areas formerly composed of labile sediment and result in channel narrowing, may reduce sediment transfer from near-channel deposits to uplands via aeolian processes. Employing spatial methods developed by Kasprak
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10362640
- Publisher / Repository:
- IOP Publishing
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Environmental Research Letters
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 1748-9326
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- Article No. 014029
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
more » « less
Abstract Many canyon‐bound rivers have been dammed and downstream flow and water temperatures modified. In some regions, climate change is expected to cause lower storage in reservoirs and warmer release temperatures, which may further alter downstream flow and thermal regimes. To anticipate potential future changes, we first need to understand the dominant heat transfer mechanisms in canyon‐bound river systems. Toward this end, we adapt a dynamic process‐based river routing and temperature model to account for complex shading and radiation characteristics found in canyon‐bound rivers. We apply the model to a 362 km segment of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, USA to simulate temperature over an 18‐year period. Extensive temperature and flow data sets from within the canyon were used to assess model performance. At the most downstream gaging location, root mean square errors of hourly flow routing and temperature predictions were 11.5 m3/s and 0.93°C, respectively. We found that heat fluxes controlling temperatures were highly variable over space and time, primarily due to shortwave radiation dynamics and hydropeaking flow conditions. Additionally, the large differences between air and water temperature during summer periods resulted in high sensible and latent heat fluxes. Sensitivity analyses indicate that reservoir release temperatures are most influential above the RM88 gage (141 km below Glen Canyon Dam), while a combination of discharge, shortwave radiation, and air temperature become more important farther downstream. This study illustrates the importance of understanding the spatial and temporal variability of topographic shading when predicting water temperatures in canyon‐bound rivers.
-
more » « less
Abstract Floodplains provide important ecological, hydrological, and geomorphic functions within river corridors. During overbank flows, complex hydrodynamic conditions occur as water exits and re‐enters the channel and interacts with hydraulically rough floodplain vegetation. However, the extent to which floodplain vegetation influences channel‐altering hydrodynamic forces and thus bedform topography and sediment transport is poorly understood. We address this knowledge gap and present the results of flume experiments where we measured bedform topography under varied floodplain vegetation conditions at two overbank flow relative depths. The experiments were conducted in a 1‐m wide meandering compound channel inset in a 15.4 long, 4.9‐m wide basin. The channel bed was a mobile sand‐and‐gravel mixture with a median sediment size of 3.3 mm, and sediment transport occurred only within the channel. We tested bare and vegetated floodplain conditions with 2.7‐cm diameter rigid emergent vegetation elements at spacings of 3.0 and 12.1 units m−2. We performed a moving‐window analysis of topographic surface metrics including skewness, coefficient of variation, and standard deviation, as well as topographic patch analysis of area and contagion to measure changes in bedform heterogeneity as flow depth and vegetation density were varied. Our results show that both greater density vegetation and larger flows can increase bedform topographic heterogeneity. These findings suggest that floodplain vegetation and natural hydrologic regimes that include overbank flows can enhance stream habitat complexity. Designing for the effects of established vegetation conditions and prioritizing floodplain vegetation planting may be useful for river managers striving to achieve successful biomic river restoration.
-
null (Ed.)Considerable research over the past several decades shows that dams, especially large, flow regulating structures, fragment watersheds and serve to disconnect the normative downstream flux of sediment and nutrients. Less attention has addressed smaller, channel-spanning Run-of-River (RoR) dams that are more commonly distributed throughout watersheds. Taking advantage of a suite of RoR dams in New England (USA), we quantify bedload flux into, through, and beyond the reservoir of five RoR dams and calculate the residence time of gravel clasts within the reservoir. To accomplish this goal, we embedded Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) PIT tags in 791 gravel clasts ranging in size from 15 mm to 81 mm which were subsequently deployed within and upstream of the impounded reservoirs. Among the 503 tracers that were transported from their deployment location, the median cumulative distance traveled was 30 m and the maximum cumulative displacement during the study period 758 m. Of the total tagged rocks placed at all five sites, 276 rocks were displaced over the dam, 204 of which spent time in the reservoir between high discharge events; the rest were transmitted downstream in a single high discharge event. Among those tracers that spent time in the reservoir prior to transmission over the dam, the average reservoir residence times at the different sites ranged from 19 - 203 days. The median grain size of tracers that were transported over the dam were identical to those that moved during the study period and similar to the median grain size of the channel bed. The distribution of virtual velocities of those tracers that moved was approximately log-normal and very broadly distributed over more than six orders of magnitude. An analysis of variance revealed that the distribution of velocities was partitioned into two statistically similar groups; with slower velocities in the two smaller watersheds (13 km2 – 21 km2) compared to the larger watersheds (89 km2 – 438 km2). We conclude that RoR dams transmit and trap the upstream sediment supply within the same range of physical conditions that produce mobility and trapping in the river’s natural reach-scale morphological units. Since RoR dams are likely not trapping more sediment than is typically sequestered in natural river reaches, these dams do not disconnect the normative downstream flux of sediment nor result in channel morphological disequilibrium downstream of the dam. However, the minimal effect that small, channel spanning RoR dams have on the morphological equilibrium state of a channel does not suggest that RoR dams have no ecological footprint.more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract Storing and managing river flows through reservoirs could dampen or increase climate‐induced fluctuations in streamflow, but interactions between the effects of dams and climate are poorly understood. Here, we examined how dam properties control different facets of flow alteration across the coterminous United States (CONUS), and compared alteration trends between dam‐affected and reference stream gages. We quantified departures from the natural flow regime using 730 stations with long‐term daily discharge data. Dam size and purpose explained high variation in flow alteration, and alteration was particularly severe in water‐stressed regions. Importantly, regulation of river flows by dams often dampened climate‐driven alteration (48% of the flow metrics), particularly in watersheds with positive flow trends; while worsening climatic impacts in other cases (44%), or even having dual effects (8%). Our results show that dam and climate impacts on streamflow need to be assessed jointly, and based on a diverse range of flow regime facets (e.g., event magnitude and duration, frequency, and timing) instead of mean annual flows only. By pairing the USGS streamflow records available from upstream and downstream of 209 dams across the CONUS, we advance the notion that dams amplify flow alteration, but also ameliorate some flow alteration metrics. Understanding such potential and limitations is important in light of climate non‐stationarity and a new wave of damming in developing economies, and will be key to further advancing environmental flow science into the future.
