Since the 1980s, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) has transformed from an agency predominantly focused on timber production to one focused on recreation and ecosystem management. This shift is particularly remarkable because it occurred without major substantive national forest policy changes. During this period, many national forests changed their forest planning processes in ways that provided greater opportunity for public input into forest plans, and in 2012 the USFS issued new planning rules that institutionalized these practices. In this study, we ask: how has the planning process changed over time, and how have these changes shaped forest plan outcomes? To answer these questions, we conduct a comparative case study of two national forests—the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit and the Inyo National Forest—that produced forest plans in the 1980s and again in the 2010s. We use the Network of Action Situations (NAS) approach to compare planning processes over time and across forests. We find that in addition to the changes mandated by the 2012 rules, both forests developed a series of forums to engage the public in plan development and review, and that increased stakeholder engagement has helped shape forest priorities. These findings suggest that greater involvement by regional stakeholders could pressure the USFS to adopt more regional approaches for addressing challenges like climate change and wildfire risk. 
                        more » 
                        « less   
                    
                            
                            The National Environmental Policy Act and the USDA Forest Service: Where We Agree, Where We Disagree, and Why
                        
                    
    
            Abstract In this article, we respond to a critique of our earlier work examining the USDA Forest Service’s (USFS’s) planning processes. We appreciate that our critics introduce new data to the discussion of USFS planning. Further data integration is a promising path to developing a deeper understanding of agency activities. Our critics’ analysis largely supports our original claims. Our most important difference is in our conceptualization of the planning process’s relationship to agency goals. Although our critics conceive of the USFS’s legally prescribed planning processes as a barrier to land management activities, we believe that public comment periods, scientific analysis, and land management activities are tools the agency uses to achieve its goals of managing land in the public interest. Study Implications: The USDA Forest Service’s current planning process has been critiqued as a barrier to accomplishing land management activities, but it is also an important tool for insuring science-based management and understanding public values and interests that the agency is legally bound to uphold. 
        more » 
        « less   
        
    
                            - Award ID(s):
- 1829255
- PAR ID:
- 10368194
- Publisher / Repository:
- Springer Science + Business Media
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Forestry
- Volume:
- 120
- Issue:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 0022-1201
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 392-394
- Size(s):
- p. 392-394
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
- 
            
- 
            Abstract Abstract This paper draws on systematic data from the US Forest Service’s (USFS) Planning, Appeals and Litigation System to analyze how the agency conducts environmental impact assessments under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). We find that only 1.9 percent of the 33,976 USFS decisions between 2005 and 2018 were processed as Environmental Impact Statements, the most rigorous and time-consuming level of analysis, whereas 82.3 percent of projects fit categorical exclusions. The median time to complete a NEPA analysis was 131 days. The number of new projects has declined dramatically in this period, with the USFS now initiating less than half as many projects per year as it did prior to 2010. We find substantial variation between USFS units in the number of projects completed and time to completion, with some units completing projects in half the time of others. These findings point toward avenues for improving the agency’s NEPA processes.more » « less
- 
            Land-use and land cover classifications are typically created using automated methods to analyze modern, spatially explicit color aerial imagery. However, creating classifications from black and white historical aerial imagery presents a number of challenges that require a combination of more traditional, manual techniques and approaches. A georectified mosaic of 113 aerial images was digitized in ArcGIS to create a land-use/land cover classification. The analyzed area covered 700 km2 (270 mi2) including all of Baltimore City, and a portion of Baltimore County immediately surrounding the city. A combination of 8 land-use and land cover classes were used: Agriculture, Barren, Built (Other), Forest, Grass/Shrubland, Industrial, Residential, and Water. This geospatial data set captures an ecologically and socially important moment in the post-war history of the city. It can be used to examine relationships between property ownership and forest patch dynamics across time. These insights may help inform future environmental planning, conservation, management, and stewardship goals for Baltimore City forest patches, and other cities throughout the region.more » « less
- 
            ABSTRACT Long-term terrestrial ecosystem monitoring is a critical component of documenting outcomes of land management actions, assessing progress towards management objectives, and guiding realistic long-term ecological goals, all through repeated observation and measurement. Traditional monitoring methods have evolved for specific applications in forestry, ecology, and fire and fuels management. While successful monitoring programs have clear goals, trained expertise, and rigorous sampling protocols, new advances in technology and data management can help overcome the most common pitfalls in data quality and repeatability. This paper presents Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS), a specific form of LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), as an emerging sampling method that can complement and enhance existing monitoring methods. TLS captures in high resolution the 3D structure of a terrestrial ecosystem (forest, grassland, etc.), and is increasingly efficient and affordable (<$30,000). Integrating TLS into ecosystem monitoring can standardize data collection, improve efficiency, and reduce bias and error. Streamlined data processing pipelines can rigorously analyze TLS data and incorporate constant improvements to inform management decisions and planning. The approach described in this paper utilizes portable, push-button TLS equipment that, when calibrated with initial transect sampling, captures detailed forestry, fuels, and ecological features in less than 5 minutes per plot. We also introduce an interagency automated processing pipeline and dashboard viewer for instant, user-friendly analysis, and data retrieval of hundreds of metrics. Forest metrics and inventories produced with these methods offer effective decision-support data for managers to quantify landscape-scale conditions and respond with efficient action. This protocol further supports interagency compatibility for efficient natural resource monitoring across jurisdictional boundaries with uniform data, language, methods, and data analysis. With continued improvement of scanner capabilities and affordability, these data will shape the future of terrestrial ecosystem monitoring as an important means to address the increasingly fast pace of ecological change facing natural resource managers.more » « less
- 
            Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) is an understanding of natural systems acquired through long-term human interactions with particular landscapes. Traditional knowledge systems complement western scientific disciplines by providing a holistic assessment of ecosystem dynamics and extending the time horizon of ecological observations. Integration of TEK into land management is a key priority of numerous groups, including the United Nations and US public land management agencies; however, TEK principles have rarely been enshrined in national-level US policy or planning. We review over 20 years of TEK literature to describe key applications of TEK to ecological understanding, conservation, restoration and land management generally. By identifying knowledge gaps, we highlight research avenues to support the integration of TEK into US public land management, in order to enhance conservation approaches and participation of historically underrepresented groups, particularly American Indian Tribes, in the stewardship of ancestral lands critical to the practice of living cultural traditions.more » « less
 An official website of the United States government
An official website of the United States government 
				
			 
					 
					
