skip to main content


Title: Cellular Microbiaxial Stretching Assay for Measurement and Characterization of the Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of Micropatterned Cells
Abstract

Characterizing the mechanical properties of single cells is important for developing descriptive models of tissue mechanics and improving the understanding of mechanically driven cell processes. Standard methods for measuring single‐cell mechanical properties typically provide isotropic mechanical descriptions. However, many cells exhibit specialized geometriesin vivo, with anisotropic cytoskeletal architectures reflective of their function, and are exposed to dynamic multiaxial loads, raising the need for more complete descriptions of their anisotropic mechanical properties under complex deformations. Here, we describe the cellular microbiaxial stretching (CμBS) assay in which controlled deformations are applied to micropatterned cells while simultaneously measuring cell stress. CμBS utilizes a set of linear actuators to apply tensile or compressive, short‐ or long‐term deformations to cells micropatterned on a fluorescent bead‐doped polyacrylamide gel. Using traction force microscopy principles and the known geometry of the cell and the mechanical properties of the underlying gel, we calculate the stress within the cell to formulate stress‐strain curves that can be further used to create mechanical descriptions of the cells, such as strain energy density functions. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Basic Protocol 1: Assembly of CμBS stretching constructs

Basic Protocol 2: Polymerization of micropatterned, bead‐doped polyacrylamide gel on an elastomer membrane

Support Protocol: Cell culture and seeding onto CμBS constructs

Basic Protocol 3: Implementing CμBS stretching protocols and traction force microscopy

Basic Protocol 4: Data analysis and cell stress measurements

 
more » « less
PAR ID:
10369589
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Current Protocols
Volume:
2
Issue:
2
ISSN:
2691-1299
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    Physical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) affect cell behaviors ranging from cell adhesion and migration to differentiation and gene expression, a process known as mechanotransduction. While most studies have focused on the impact of ECM stiffness, using linearly elastic materials such as polyacrylamide gels as cell culture substrates, biological tissues and ECMs are viscoelastic, which means they exhibit time‐dependent mechanical responses and dissipate mechanical energy. Recent studies have revealed ECM viscoelasticity, independent of stiffness, as a critical physical parameter regulating cellular processes. These studies have used biomaterials with tunable viscoelasticity as cell‐culture substrates, with alginate hydrogels being one of the most commonly used systems. Here, we detail the protocols for three approaches to modulating viscoelasticity in alginate hydrogels for 2D and 3D cell culture studies, as well as the testing of their mechanical properties. Viscoelasticity in alginate hydrogels can be tuned by varying the molecular weight of the alginate polymer, changing the type of crosslinker—ionic versus covalent—or by grafting short poly(ethylene‐glycol) (PEG) chains to the alginate polymer. As these approaches are based on commercially available products and simple chemistries, these protocols should be accessible for scientists in the cell biology and bioengineering communities. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

    Basic Protocol 1: Tuning viscoelasticity by varying alginate molecular weight

    Basic Protocol 2: Tuning viscoelasticity with ionic versus covalent crosslinking

    Basic Protocol 3: Tuning viscoelasticity by adding PEG spacers to alginate chains

    Support Protocol 1: Testing mechanical properties of alginate hydrogels

    Support Protocol 2: Conjugating cell‐adhesion peptide RGD to alginate

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Base‐editing technologies enable the introduction of point mutations at targeted genomic sites in mammalian cells, with higher efficiency and precision than traditional genome‐editing methods that use DNA double‐strand breaks, such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription‐activator‐like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–CRISPR‐associated protein 9 (CRISPR‐Cas9) system. This allows the generation of single‐nucleotide‐variant isogenic cell lines (i.e., cell lines whose genomic sequences differ from each other only at a single, edited nucleotide) in a more time‐ and resource‐effective manner. These single‐nucleotide‐variant clonal cell lines represent a powerful tool with which to assess the functional role of genetic variants in a native cellular context. Base editing can therefore facilitate genotype‐to‐phenotype studies in a controlled laboratory setting, with applications in both basic research and clinical applications. Here, we provide optimized protocols (including experimental design, methods, and analyses) to design base‐editing constructs, transfect adherent cells, quantify base‐editing efficiencies in bulk, and generate single‐nucleotide‐variant clonal cell lines. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

    Basic Protocol 1: Design and production of plasmids for base‐editing experiments

    Basic Protocol 2: Transfection of adherent cells and harvesting of genomic DNA

    Basic Protocol 3: Genotyping of harvested cells using Sanger sequencing

    Alternate Protocol 1: Next‐generation sequencing to quantify base editing

    Basic Protocol 4: Single‐cell isolation of base‐edited cells using FACS

    Alternate Protocol 2: Single‐cell isolation of base‐edited cells using dilution plating

    Basic Protocol 5: Clonal expansion to generate isogenic cell lines and genotyping of clones

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    In this invited article, we explain technical aspects of the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) system, providing an update of a prior contribution by Matthias von Herrath and J. Lindsay Whitton. We provide an explanation of the LCMV infection models, highlighting the importance of selecting an appropriate route and viral strain. We also describe how to quantify virus‐specific immune responses, followed by an explanation of useful transgenic systems. Specifically, our article will focus on the following protocols. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

    Basic Protocol 1: LCMV infection routes in mice

    Support Protocol 1: Preparation of LCMV stocks

    ASSAYS TO MEASURE LCMV TITERS

    Support Protocol 2: Plaque assay

    Support Protocol 3: Immunofluorescence focus assay (IFA) to measure LCMV titer

    MEASUREMENT OF T CELL AND B CELL RESPONSES TO LCMV INFECTION

    Basic Protocol 2: Triple tetramer staining for detection of LCMV‐specific CD8 T cells

    Basic Protocol 3: Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) for detection of LCMV‐specific T cells

    Basic Protocol 4: Enumeration of direct ex vivo LCMV‐specific antibody‐secreting cells (ASC)

    Basic Protocol 5: Limiting dilution assay (LDA) for detection of LCMV‐specific memory B cells

    Basic Protocol 6: ELISA for quantification of LCMV‐specific IgG antibody

    Support Protocol 4: Preparation of splenic lymphocytes

    Support Protocol 5: Making BHK21‐LCMV lysate

    Basic Protocol 7: Challenge models

    TRANSGENIC MODELS

    Basic Protocol 8: Transfer of P14 cells to interrogate the role of IFN‐I on CD8 T cell responses

    Basic Protocol 9: Comparing the expansion of naïve versus memory CD4 T cells following chronic viral challenge

     
    more » « less
  4. null (Ed.)
    Mammalian cells have evolved complex mechanical connections to their microenvironment, including focal adhesion clusters that physically connect the cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix. This mechanical link is also part of the cellular machinery to transduce, sense and respond to external forces. Although methods to measure cell attachment and cellular traction forces are well established, these are not capable of quantifying force transmission through the cell body to adhesion sites. We here present a novel approach to quantify intracellular force transmission by combining microneedle shearing at the apical cell surface with traction force microscopy at the basal cell surface. The change of traction forces exerted by fibroblasts to underlying polyacrylamide substrates as a response to a known shear force exerted with a calibrated microneedle reveals that cells redistribute forces dynamically under external shearing and during sequential rupture of their adhesion sites. Our quantitative results demonstrate a transition from dipolar to monopolar traction patterns, an inhomogeneous distribution of the external shear force to the adhesion sites as well as dynamical changes in force loading prior to and after the rupture of single adhesion sites. Our strategy of combining traction force microscopy with external force application opens new perspectives for future studies of force transmission and mechanotransduction in cells. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    Science and medicine have become increasingly “human‐centric” over the years. A growing shift away from the use of animals in basic research has led to the development of sophisticated in vitro models of various tissues utilizing human‐derived cells to study physiology and disease. The human cornea has likewise been modeled in vitro using primary cells derived from corneas obtained from cadavers or post‐transplantation. By utilizing a cell's intrinsic ability to maintain its tissue phenotype in a pre‐designed microenvironment containing the required growth factors, physiological temperature, and humidity, tissue‐engineered corneas can be grown and maintained in culture for relatively long periods of time on the scale of weeks to months. Due to its transparency and avascularity, the cornea is an optimal tissue for studies of extracellular matrix and cell‐cell interactions, toxicology and permeability of drugs, and underlying mechanisms of scarring and tissue regeneration. This paper describes methods for the cultivation of corneal keratocytes, fibroblasts, epithelial, and endothelial cells for in vitro applications. We also provide detailed, step‐by‐step protocols for assembling and culturing 3D constructs of the corneal stroma, epithelial‐ and endothelial‐stromal co‐cultures and isolation of extracellular vesicles. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

    Basic Protocol 1: Isolating and culturing human corneal keratocytes and fibroblasts

    Basic Protocol 2: Isolating and culturing human corneal epithelial cells

    Basic Protocol 3: Isolating and culturing human corneal endothelial cells

    Basic Protocol 4: 3D corneal stromal construct assembly

    Basic Protocol 5: 3D corneal epithelial‐stromal construct assembly

    Basic Protocol 6: 3D corneal endothelial‐stromal construct assembly

    Basic Protocol 7: Isolating extracellular vesicles from corneal cell conditioned medium

    Support Protocol: Cryopreserving human corneal fibroblasts, corneal epithelial cells, and corneal endothelial cells

     
    more » « less