More Like this

1. ACE-SNN: Algorithm-Hardware Co-design of Energy-Efficient & Low-Latency Deep Spiking Neural Networks for 3D Image Recognition

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.815258  

   Datta, Gourav ; Kundu, Souvik ; Jaiswal, Akhilesh R. ; Beerel, Peter A. ( April 2022 , Frontiers in Neuroscience)

   High-quality 3D image recognition is an important component of many vision and robotics systems. However, the accurate processing of these images requires the use of compute-expensive 3D Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). To address this challenge, we propose the use of Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) that are generated from iso-architecture CNNs and trained with quantization-aware gradient descent to optimize their weights, membrane leak, and firing thresholds. During both training and inference, the analog pixel values of a 3D image are directly applied to the input layer of the SNN without the need to convert to a spike-train. This significantly reduces the training and inference latency and results in high degree of activation sparsity, which yields significant improvements in computational efficiency. However, this introduces energy-hungry digital multiplications in the first layer of our models, which we propose to mitigate using a processing-in-memory (PIM) architecture. To evaluate our proposal, we propose a 3D and a 3D/2D hybrid SNN-compatible convolutional architecture and choose hyperspectral imaging (HSI) as an application for 3D image recognition. We achieve overall test accuracy of 98.68, 99.50, and 97.95% with 5 time steps (inference latency) and 6-bit weight quantization on the Indian Pines, Pavia University, and Salinas Scene datasets, respectively.more »In particular, our models implemented using standard digital hardware achieved accuracies similar to state-of-the-art (SOTA) with ~560.6× and ~44.8× less average energy than an iso-architecture full-precision and 6-bit quantized CNN, respectively. Adopting the PIM architecture in the first layer, further improves the average energy, delay, and energy-delay-product (EDP) by 30, 7, and 38%, respectively.« less
2. HyDREA: Utilizing Hyperdimensional Computing For A More Robust and Efficient Machine Learning System

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3524067  

   Morris, Justin ; Ergun, Kazim ; Khaleghi, Behnam ; Imani, Mohsen ; Aksanli, Baris ; Rosing, Tajana ( January 2022 , ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems)

   Today’s systems, rely on sending all the data to the cloud, and then use complex algorithms, such as Deep Neural Networks, which require billions of parameters and many hours to train a model. In contrast, the human brain can do much of this learning effortlessly. Hyperdimensional (HD) Computing aims to mimic the behavior of the human brain by utilizing high dimensional representations. This leads to various desirable properties that other Machine Learning (ML) algorithms lack such as: robustness to noise in the system and simple, highly parallel operations. In this paper, we propose \(\mathsf {HyDREA} \) , a Hy per D imensional Computing system that is R obust, E fficient, and A ccurate. We propose a Processing-in-Memory (PIM) architecture that works in a federated learning environment with challenging communication scenarios that cause errors in the transmitted data. \(\mathsf {HyDREA} \) adaptively changes the bitwidth of the model based on the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the incoming sample to maintain the accuracy of the HD model while achieving significant speedup and energy efficiency. Our PIM architecture is able to achieve a speedup of 28 × and 255 × better energy efficiency compared to the baseline PIM architecture for Classificationmore »and achieves 32 × speed up and 289 × higher energy efficiency than the baseline architecture for Clustering. \(\mathsf {HyDREA} \) is able to achieve this by relaxing hardware parameters to gain energy efficiency and speedup while introducing computational errors. We show experimentally, HD Computing is able to handle the errors without a significant drop in accuracy due to its unique robustness property. For wireless noise, we found that \(\mathsf {HyDREA} \) is 48 × more robust to noise than other comparable ML algorithms. Our results indicate that our proposed system loses less than \(1\% \) Classification accuracy, even in scenarios with an SNR of 6.64. We additionally test the robustness of using HD Computing for Clustering applications and found that our proposed system also looses less than \(1\% \) in the mutual information score, even in scenarios with an SNR under 7 dB , which is 57 × more robust to noise than K-means.« less
3. Learning molecular dynamics with simple language model built upon long short-term memory neural network

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18959-8  

   Tsai, Sun-Ting ; Kuo, En-Jui ; Tiwary, Pratyush ( December 2020 , Nature Communications)

   Abstract Recurrent neural networks have led to breakthroughs in natural language processing and speech recognition. Here we show that recurrent networks, specifically long short-term memory networks can also capture the temporal evolution of chemical/biophysical trajectories. Our character-level language model learns a probabilistic model of 1-dimensional stochastic trajectories generated from higher-dimensional dynamics. The model captures Boltzmann statistics and also reproduces kinetics across a spectrum of timescales. We demonstrate how training the long short-term memory network is equivalent to learning a path entropy, and that its embedding layer, instead of representing contextual meaning of characters, here exhibits a nontrivial connectivity between different metastable states in the underlying physical system. We demonstrate our model’s reliability through different benchmark systems and a force spectroscopy trajectory for multi-state riboswitch. We anticipate that our work represents a stepping stone in the understanding and use of recurrent neural networks for understanding the dynamics of complex stochastic molecular systems.
4. Issues in the Reproducibility of Deep Learning Results

   https://doi.org/10.1109/SPMB47826.2019.9037840  

   Jean-Paul, S. ; Elseify, T. ; Obeid, I. ; Picone, J. ( December 2019 , IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB))

   Obeid, I. ; Selesnik, I. ; Picone, J. (Ed.)

   The Neuronix high-performance computing cluster allows us to conduct extensive machine learning experiments on big data [1]. This heterogeneous cluster uses innovative scheduling technology, Slurm [2], that manages a network of CPUs and graphics processing units (GPUs). The GPU farm consists of a variety of processors ranging from low-end consumer grade devices such as the Nvidia GTX 970 to higher-end devices such as the GeForce RTX 2080. These GPUs are essential to our research since they allow extremely compute-intensive deep learning tasks to be executed on massive data resources such as the TUH EEG Corpus [2]. We use TensorFlow [3] as the core machine learning library for our deep learning systems, and routinely employ multiple GPUs to accelerate the training process. Reproducible results are essential to machine learning research. Reproducibility in this context means the ability to replicate an existing experiment – performance metrics such as error rates should be identical and floating-point calculations should match closely. Three examples of ways we typically expect an experiment to be replicable are: (1) The same job run on the same processor should produce the same results each time it is run. (2) A job run on a CPU and GPU should producemore »identical results. (3) A job should produce comparable results if the data is presented in a different order. System optimization requires an ability to directly compare error rates for algorithms evaluated under comparable operating conditions. However, it is a difficult task to exactly reproduce the results for large, complex deep learning systems that often require more than a trillion calculations per experiment [5]. This is a fairly well-known issue and one we will explore in this poster. Researchers must be able to replicate results on a specific data set to establish the integrity of an implementation. They can then use that implementation as a baseline for comparison purposes. A lack of reproducibility makes it very difficult to debug algorithms and validate changes to the system. Equally important, since many results in deep learning research are dependent on the order in which the system is exposed to the data, the specific processors used, and even the order in which those processors are accessed, it becomes a challenging problem to compare two algorithms since each system must be individually optimized for a specific data set or processor. This is extremely time-consuming for algorithm research in which a single run often taxes a computing environment to its limits. Well-known techniques such as cross-validation [5,6] can be used to mitigate these effects, but this is also computationally expensive. These issues are further compounded by the fact that most deep learning algorithms are susceptible to the way computational noise propagates through the system. GPUs are particularly notorious for this because, in a clustered environment, it becomes more difficult to control which processors are used at various points in time. Another equally frustrating issue is that upgrades to the deep learning package, such as the transition from TensorFlow v1.9 to v1.13, can also result in large fluctuations in error rates when re-running the same experiment. Since TensorFlow is constantly updating functions to support GPU use, maintaining an historical archive of experimental results that can be used to calibrate algorithm research is quite a challenge. This makes it very difficult to optimize the system or select the best configurations. The overall impact of all of these issues described above is significant as error rates can fluctuate by as much as 25% due to these types of computational issues. Cross-validation is one technique used to mitigate this, but that is expensive since you need to do multiple runs over the data, which further taxes a computing infrastructure already running at max capacity. GPUs are preferred when training a large network since these systems train at least two orders of magnitude faster than CPUs [7]. Large-scale experiments are simply not feasible without using GPUs. However, there is a tradeoff to gain this performance. Since all our GPUs use the NVIDIA CUDA® Deep Neural Network library (cuDNN) [8], a GPU-accelerated library of primitives for deep neural networks, it adds an element of randomness into the experiment. When a GPU is used to train a network in TensorFlow, it automatically searches for a cuDNN implementation. NVIDIA’s cuDNN implementation provides algorithms that increase the performance and help the model train quicker, but they are non-deterministic algorithms [9,10]. Since our networks have many complex layers, there is no easy way to avoid this randomness. Instead of comparing each epoch, we compare the average performance of the experiment because it gives us a hint of how our model is performing per experiment, and if the changes we make are efficient. In this poster, we will discuss a variety of issues related to reproducibility and introduce ways we mitigate these effects. For example, TensorFlow uses a random number generator (RNG) which is not seeded by default. TensorFlow determines the initialization point and how certain functions execute using the RNG. The solution for this is seeding all the necessary components before training the model. This forces TensorFlow to use the same initialization point and sets how certain layers work (e.g., dropout layers). However, seeding all the RNGs will not guarantee a controlled experiment. Other variables can affect the outcome of the experiment such as training using GPUs, allowing multi-threading on CPUs, using certain layers, etc. To mitigate our problems with reproducibility, we first make sure that the data is processed in the same order during training. Therefore, we save the data from the last experiment and to make sure the newer experiment follows the same order. If we allow the data to be shuffled, it can affect the performance due to how the model was exposed to the data. We also specify the float data type to be 32-bit since Python defaults to 64-bit. We try to avoid using 64-bit precision because the numbers produced by a GPU can vary significantly depending on the GPU architecture [11-13]. Controlling precision somewhat reduces differences due to computational noise even though technically it increases the amount of computational noise. We are currently developing more advanced techniques for preserving the efficiency of our training process while also maintaining the ability to reproduce models. In our poster presentation we will demonstrate these issues using some novel visualization tools, present several examples of the extent to which these issues influence research results on electroencephalography (EEG) and digital pathology experiments and introduce new ways to manage such computational issues.« less
5. Recurrent neural network models for working memory of continuous variables: activity manifolds, connectivity patterns, and dynamic codes

   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.01275  

   Cueva, Christopher J. ; Ardalan, Adel ; Tsodyks, Misha ; Qian, Ning ( January 2021 , ArXivorg)

   Many daily activities and psychophysical experiments involve keeping multiple items in working memory. When items take continuous values (e.g., orientation, contrast, length, loudness) they must be stored in a continuous structure of appropriate dimensions. We investigate how this structure is represented in neural circuits by training recurrent networks to report two previously shown stimulus orientations. We find the activity manifold for the two orientations resembles a Clifford torus. Although a Clifford and standard torus (the surface of a donut) are topologically equivalent, they have important functional differences. A Clifford torus treats the two orientations equally and keeps them in orthogonal subspaces, as demanded by the task, whereas a standard torus does not. We find and characterize the connectivity patterns that support the Clifford torus. Moreover, in addition to attractors that store information via persistent activity, our networks also use a dynamic code where units change their tuning to prevent new sensory input from overwriting the previously stored one. We argue that such dynamic codes are generally required whenever multiple inputs enter a memory system via shared connections. Finally, we apply our framework to a human psychophysics experiment in which subjects reported two remembered orientations. By varying the training conditions ofmore »the RNNs, we test and support the hypothesis that human behavior is a product of both neural noise and reliance on the more stable and behaviorally relevant memory of the ordinal relationship between the two orientations. This suggests that suitable inductive biases in RNNs are important for uncovering how the human brain implements working memory. Together, these results offer an understanding of the neural computations underlying a class of visual decoding tasks, bridging the scales from human behavior to synaptic connectivity.« less