Distortion arises during machining of metallic parts from two main mechanisms: 1) release of bulk residual stress (BRS) in the pre-form, and 2) permanent deformation induced by cut tools. Interaction between these mechanisms is unexplored.
Assess this interaction using aluminum samples that have a flat surface with variations of BRS, where that surface is subsequently milled, and we observe milling-induced residual stress (MIRS) and distortion.
Plate samples are cut from two kinds of large blocks, one kind stress-relieved by stretching and a second kind solution heat treated, quenched and aged. The BRS field in the plates is known from a recent series of measurements, being small in the stress relieved plates (within ±20 MPa) and large (±100 MPa) in the quenched plates, varying from tension to compression over the surface that is milled. MIRS is measured following milling using hole-drilling. Distortions of thin wafers cut at the milled surfaces are used to elucidate BRS/MIRS interactions. A finite element (FE) model and a strength of materials model are each used to assess consistency between wafer distortion and measured MIRS.
Milling in samples with high BRS magnitude changes the directions of MIRS and distortion relative to the milling direction, with the direction of more »
Measured residual stress and observed wafer distortion both show interactions between MIRS and BRS. Stress analysis models show that the differences in measured MIRS are consistent with the differences in observed distortion.
- Publication Date:
- NSF-PAR ID:
- Journal Name:
- Experimental Mechanics
- Page Range or eLocation-ID:
- p. 1437-1459
- Springer Science + Business Media
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
Abstract Background While near surface residual stress (NSRS) from milling is a driver for distortion in aluminum parts there are few studies that directly compare available techniques for NSRS measurement. Objective We report application and assessment of four different techniques for evaluating residual stress versus depth in milled aluminum parts. Methods The four techniques are: hole-drilling, slotting, cos(α) x-ray diffraction (XRD), and sin 2 (ψ) XRD, all including incremental material removal to produce a stress versus depth profile. The milled aluminum parts are cut from stress-relieved plate, AA7050-T7451, with a range of table and tool speeds used to mill a large flat surface in several samples. NSRS measurements are made at specified locations on each sample. Results Resulting data show that NSRS from three techniques are in general agreement: hole-drilling, slotting, and sin 2 (ψ) XRD. At shallow depths (< 0.03 mm), sin 2 (ψ) XRD data have the best repeatability (< 15 MPa), but at larger depths (> 0.04 mm) hole-drilling and slotting have the best repeatability (< 10 MPa). NSRS data from cos(α) XRD differ from data provided by other techniques and the data are less repeatable. NSRS data for different milling parameters show that the depth of NSRS increases with feed per tooth and ismore »
Prior work described an approach for mapping the two-dimensional spatial distribution of biaxial residual stress in plate-like samples, the approach combining multiple slitting measurements with elastic stress analysis.
This paper extends the prior work by applying a new variation of the slitting method that uses measurements of cut mouth opening displacement (CMOD) rather than back-face strain (BFS).
First, CMOD slitting is validated using an experiment where: BFS and CMOD are measured simultaneously on the same sample during incremental slitting; two residual stress profiles are computed, one from the BFS data and a second from the CMOD data; and the two residual stress profiles are compared. Following validation, multiple adjacent CMOD slitting measurements are used to construct two-dimensional maps of residual stress in plates cut from quenched aluminum.
The two residual stress versus depth profiles, each computed separately from BFS or CMOD data, are in agreement, with compression near the plate boundaries (-150 MPa) and tension near the plate center (100 MPa); differences between the two stress profiles have a maximum of 25 MPa and a RMS of 7.2 MPa. Repeated biaxial residual stress mapping measurements show the CMOD technique is repeatable, and complementary contour method measurements show the mappingsmore »
Intermethod comparison and evaluation of near surface residual stress in aluminum parts subject to various milling parametersNear surface residual stress (NSRS) induced by machining (e.g., milling) is known to drive distortion in machined aluminum, particularly in thin complex geometries with tight tolerance requirements where large distortion is undesirable. The understanding and characterization of NSRS in milled aluminum parts is important and should be included in the design and manufacturing process. There exist a variety of experimental tests characterizing these stresses. The objective of this paper is to assess the quality of three experimental methods for evaluating NSRS in prismatic aluminum parts subject to various milling parameters. The three methods are: hole-drilling, slotting, and x-ray diffraction, all of which include incremental material removal. The aluminum parts are cut from stress-relieved plate, AA7050-T7451. A combination of milling table and tool speeds are used to machine a flat surface in the parts. Measurements are made at specified locations and depths on each part. NSRS data from the hole drilling and slotting measurements were comparable; NSRS data from x-ray diffraction differed and was less repeatable. NSRS data for different milling parameters shows that the depth of NSRS increases with feed per tooth but is unaffected by different cutting speeds.
Analysis of machining-induced residual stresses of milled aluminum workpieces, their repeatability, and their resulting distortionAbstract Machining-induced residual stresses (MIRS) are a main driver for distortion of thin-walled monolithic aluminum workpieces. Before one can develop compensation techniques to minimize distortion, the effect of machining on the MIRS has to be fully understood. This means that not only an investigation of the effect of different process parameters on the MIRS is important. In addition, the repeatability of the MIRS resulting from the same machining condition has to be considered. In past research, statistical confidence of MIRS of machined samples was not focused on. In this paper, the repeatability of the MIRS for different machining modes, consisting of a variation in feed per tooth and cutting speed, is investigated. Multiple hole-drilling measurements within one sample and on different samples, machined with the same parameter set, were part of the investigations. Besides, the effect of two different clamping strategies on the MIRS was investigated. The results show that an overall repeatability for MIRS is given for stable machining (between 16 and 34% repeatability standard deviation of maximum normal MIRS), whereas instable machining, detected by vibrations in the force signal, has worse repeatability (54%) independent of the used clamping strategy. Further experiments, where a 1-mm-thick wafer was removed atmore »
Additive manufacturing (AM) is a powerful technique for producing metallic components with complex geometry relatively quickly, cheaply and directly from digital representations; however, residual stresses induced during manufacturing can result in distortions of components and reductions in mechanical performance, especially in parts that lack rotational symmetry and, or have cross sections with large aspect ratios. Geometrically reinforced thin plates have been built in nickel–chromium alloy using laser-powder bed fusion (L-PBF) and their shapes measured using stereoscopic digital image correlation before and after release from the base-plate of the AM machine. The results show that residual stresses cause potentially severe out-of-plane deformation that can be alleviated using either an enveloping support structure, which increased the build time substantially, was difficult to remove and wasted material, or using buttress supports to the reinforced edges of the thin plate. The buttresses were quick to build and remove, minimised waste but needed careful design. Plates built in a landscape orientation required out-of-plane buttresses while those built in a portrait orientation required both in-plane and out-of-plane buttresses. In both cases, out-of-plane deformation increased on release from the baseplate but this was mitigated by incremental release which resulted in out-of-plane deformations of less than 5%more »