In its first 2 years of operation, the ground‐based Terrestrial gamma ray flash and Energetic Thunderstorm Rooftop Array (TETRA)‐II array of gamma ray detectors has recorded 22 bursts of gamma rays of millisecond‐scale duration associated with lightning. In this study, we present the TETRA‐II observations detected at the three TETRA‐II ground‐level sites in Louisiana, Puerto Rico, and Panama together with the simultaneous radio frequency signals from the lightning data sets VAISALA Global Lightning Dataset, VAISALA National Lightning Detection Network, Earth Networks Total Lightning Network, and World Wide Lightning Location Network. The relative timing between the gamma ray events and the lightning activity is a key parameter for understanding the production mechanism(s) of the bursts. The gamma ray time profiles and their correlation with radio sferics suggest that the gamma ray events are initiated by lightning leader activity and are produced near the last stage of lightning leader channel development prior to the lightning return stroke.
The terrestrial gamma‐ray flash (TGF) and Energetic Thunderstorm Rooftop Array (TETRA‐II) detected 22 X‐ray/gamma‐ray flash events associated with lightning between October 2015 and March 2019 across three ground‐based detector locations in subtropical and tropical climates in Louisiana, Puerto Rico, and Panama. Each detector array consists of a set of bismuth germanate scintillators that record X‐ray and gamma‐ray bursts over the energy range 50 keV–6 MeV (million electron volts). TETRA‐II events have characteristics similar to both X‐ray bursts associated with lightning leaders and TGFs: sub‐millisecond duration, photons up to MeV energies, and association with nearby lightning (typically within 3 km). About 20 of the 22 events are geolocated to individual lightning strokes via spatiotemporally coincident sferics. An examination of radar reflectivity and derived products related to events located within the Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) monitoring region indicates that events occur within mature cells of severe and non‐severe multicellular and squall line thunderstorms, with core echo tops which are at or nearing peak altitude. Events occur in both high lightning frequency thunderstorm cells and low lightning frequency cells. Events associated with high frequency cells occur within 5 min of significant lightning jumps. Among NEXRAD‐monitored events, hail is present within 8 km and 5 min of all except a single low‐altitude cold weather thunderstorm. An association is seen with maximum thunderstorm development, lightning jumps, and hail cells, indicating that the TETRA‐II X‐ray/gamma‐ray events are associated with the peak storm electrification and development of electric fields necessary for the acceleration of electrons to high energies.
more » « less- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10375143
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Volume:
- 126
- Issue:
- 15
- ISSN:
- 2169-897X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
more » « less
Abstract Accurate measurements of global lightning are essential for understanding present and future atmospheric electricity, composition, and climate. The latest space‐based lightning detector, the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM), was the first to be placed in geostationary orbit, with a continuous view of most of the American continents. Prior to the GLM, the Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite collected lightning measurements from which numerous lightning climatologies have been developed, including those used in global models. However, this study finds that both the GLM and a second, similar LIS placed on the International Space Station (ISS) in 2017 detect lightning at similar rates and are undercounting lightning compared to ground‐based Lightning Mapping Arrays (LMAs). The GLM undercounts lightning by an average factor of 7.0, reaching a maximum over 120 as a function of satellite zenith angle, radar reflectivity at a height where the temperature is −10°C, flash height, and thunderstorm polarity. The LIS is estimated to undercount lightning by an average factor of 5.6, reaching a maximum of 75.0 as a function of radar reflectivity at the −10°C level, flash height, and thunderstorm polarity. Preliminary predictive equations for the GLM and LIS lightning undercount factor, or scaling factor (SF), use ice‐water content, equilibrium level, flash height, and satellite zenith angle, all of which can be derived in models. These equations are developed to encourage updating lightning parameterizations within global models and will likely increase modeled lightning's effects on atmospheric electrical circuits, composition, chemistry, and climate change.
-
more » « less
Abstract Terrestrial gamma‐ray flashes (TGFs) are bright bursts of gamma rays produced by thunderstorms, typically observed by spacecraft in the low‐Earth orbit. Unfortunately, it has been difficult to disentangle the source altitude and the width and direction of the gamma‐ray beam using single point spacecraft measurements, which has hampered attempts to constrain TGF models. Polarimetry of astrophysical sources has been of interest for many decades, which raises the question: Do TGFs and X‐rays from lightning have observable polarization, and if so, what would this polarization tell us about their source? REAM Monte Carlo code has been modified to record the linear polarization of X‐rays and gamma rays as a function of source altitude and beam geometry. It is found that polarization degree of a 20‐km narrow beam of TGF is substantially different from a 15‐km‐wide beam, which could be used to constrain the source geometry of TGFs. However, due to the low fluence of these events in space, detecting this level of polarization would be challenging. It is also found that low‐altitude TGFs (source at 3.5 km) produce polarizations up to about 8%; however, detectors need to be very close to the source region. Furthermore, very low altitude ground‐level TGFs and X‐rays showed a maximum polarization of 13% on the ground, of which the TGF's fluence was large enough for polarimetry. In addition, polarization reached its maximum further away from the
z axis as the TGF's beam broadened. The dominant mechanism of the polarization was found to be Compton scattering. -
more » « less
Abstract We provide an updated analysis of the gamma ray signature of a terrestrial gamma ray flash (TGF) detected by the Fermi Gamma ray Burst Monitor first reported by Pu et al. (2020,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089427 ). A TGF produced 3 ms prior to a negative cloud‐to‐ground return stroke was close to simultaneous with an isolated low‐frequency radio pulse during the leader’s propagation, with a polarity indicating downward moving negative charge. In previous observations, this “slow” low‐frequency signal has been strongly correlated with upward‐directed (opposite polarity) TGF events (Pu et al., 2019,https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082743 ; Cummer et al., 2011,https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048099 ), leading the authors to conclude that the Fermi gamma ray observation is actually the result of a reverse positron beam generating upward‐directed gamma rays. We investigate the feasibility of this scenario and determine a lower limit on the luminosity of the downward TGF from the perspective of gamma ray timing uncertainties, TGF Monte Carlo simulations, and meteorological analysis of a model storm cell and its possible charge structure altitudes. We determined that the most likely source altitude of the TGF reverse beam was 7.5 km ± 2.6 km, just below an estimated negative charge center at 8 km. At that altitude, the Monte Carlo simulations indicate a lower luminosity limit of 2 × 1018photons above 1 MeV for the main downward beam of the TGF, making the reverse beam detectable by the Fermi Gamma ray Burst Monitor. -
Abstract In recent years, hail accumulations from thunderstorms have occurred frequently enough to catch the attention of the National Weather Service, the general public, and news agencies. Despite the extreme nature of these thunderstorms, no mechanism is currently in place to obtain adequate reports, measurements, or forecasts of accumulated hail depth. To better identify and forecast hail accumulations, the Colorado Hail Accumulation from Thunderstorms (CHAT) project was initiated in 2016 with the goals of collecting improved and more frequent hail depth reports on the ground as well as studying characteristics of storms that produce hail accumulations in Colorado. A desired outcome of this research is to identify predictors for hail-producing thunderstorms typically occurring along the Colorado Front Range that might be used as operational nowcast products in the future. During the 2016 convective season, we asked amateur meteorologists to send general information, photos, and videos on hail depth using social media. They submitted over 58 reports in Colorado with information on location, time, depth, and areal coverage of hail accumulations. We have analyzed dual-polarization radar and lightning mapping array data from 32 thunderstorms in Colorado, which produced between 0.5 and 50 cm of hail accumulation on the ground, to identify characteristics unique to storms with hail accumulations. This preliminary analysis shows how enhanced in-cloud hail presence and surface accumulation can be tracked throughout the lifetime of a thunderstorm using dual-polarization radar and lightning data, and how hail accumulation events are associated with large in-cloud ice water content, long hailfall duration, or a combination of these.more » « less
