skip to main content

Explore Research Products in the NSF-PAR

  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Specific phenotypic, genomic, and fitness evolutionary trajectories toward streptomycin resistance induced by pesticide co-stressors in Escherichia coli
Title: Specific phenotypic, genomic, and fitness evolutionary trajectories toward streptomycin resistance induced by pesticide co-stressors in Escherichia coli
Abstract

To explore how co-occurring non-antibiotic environmental stressors affect evolutionary trajectories toward antibiotic resistance, we exposed susceptible Escherichia coli K-12 populations to environmentally relevant levels of pesticides and streptomycin for 500 generations. The coexposure substantially changed the phenotypic, genotypic, and fitness evolutionary trajectories, resulting in much stronger streptomycin resistance (>15-fold increase) of the populations. Antibiotic target modification mutations in rpsL and rsmG, which emerged and dominated at late stages of evolution, conferred the strong resistance even with less than 1% abundance, while the off-target mutations in nuoG, nuoL, glnE, and yaiW dominated at early stages only led to mild resistance (2.5–6-fold increase). Moreover, the strongly resistant mutants exhibited lower fitness costs even without the selective pressure and had lower minimal selection concentrations than the mildly resistant ones. Removal of the selective pressure did not reverse the strong resistance of coexposed populations at a later evolutionary stage. The findings suggest higher risks of the selection and propagation of strong antibiotic resistance in environments potentially impacted by antibiotics and pesticides.

  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2045658
NSF-PAR ID:
10383858
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Oxford University Press
Date Published:
Journal Name:
ISME Communications
Volume:
1
Issue:
1
ISSN:
2730-6151
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; ( , Microbiology Spectrum)
    Zhang, Xue (Ed.)
    ABSTRACT

    Bacterial growth and metabolic rates are often closely related. However, under antibiotic selection, a paradox in this relationship arises: antibiotic efficacy decreases when bacteria are metabolically dormant, yet antibiotics select for resistant cells that grow fastest during treatment. That is, antibiotic selection counterintuitively favors bacteria with fast growth but slow metabolism. Despite this apparent contradiction, antibiotic resistant cells have historically been characterized primarily in the context of growth, whereas the extent of analogous changes in metabolism is comparatively unknown. Here, we observed that previously evolved antibiotic-resistant strains exhibited a unique relationship between growth and metabolism whereby nutrient utilization became more efficient, regardless of the growth rate. To better understand this unexpected phenomenon, we used a simplified model to simulate bacterial populations adapting to sub-inhibitory antibiotic selection through successive bottlenecking events. Simulations predicted that sub-inhibitory bactericidal antibiotic concentrations could select for enhanced metabolic efficiency, defined based on nutrient utilization: drug-adapted cells are able to achieve the same biomass while utilizing less substrate, even in the absence of treatment. Moreover, simulations predicted that restoring metabolic efficiency would re-sensitize resistant bacteria exhibiting metabolic-dependent resistance; we confirmed this result using adaptive laboratory evolutions ofEscherichia coliunder carbenicillin treatment. Overall, these results indicate that metabolic efficiency is under direct selective pressure during antibiotic treatment and that differences in evolutionary context may determine both the efficacy of different antibiotics and corresponding re-sensitization approaches.

    IMPORTANCE

    The sustained emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens combined with the stalled drug discovery pipelines highlights the critical need to better understand the underlying evolution mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. To this end, bacterial growth and metabolic rates are often closely related, and resistant cells have historically been characterized exclusively in the context of growth. However, under antibiotic selection, antibiotics counterintuitively favor cells with fast growth, and slow metabolism. Through an integrated approach of mathematical modeling and experiments, this study thereby addresses the significant knowledge gap of whether antibiotic selection drives changes in metabolism that complement, and/or act independently, of antibiotic resistance phenotypes.

     
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; ( , Evolutionary Applications)
    Abstract

    Organophosphate (OP) and carbamate (CM) insecticides are widely used in the United States and share the same mode of toxic action. Both classes are frequently documented in aquatic ecosystems, sometimes at levels that exceed aquatic life benchmarks. We previously identified a population of the nontarget amphipod,Hyalella azteca, thriving in an agricultural creek with high sediment levels of the OP chlorpyrifos, suggesting the population may have acquired genetic resistance to the pesticide. In the present study, we surveyed 17 populations ofH. aztecain California to screen for phenotypic resistance to chlorpyrifos as well as genetic signatures of resistance in the acetylcholinesterase (ace‐1) gene. We found no phenotypic chlorpyrifos resistance in populations from areas with little or no pesticide use. However, there was ~3‐ to 1,000‐fold resistance inH. aztecapopulations from agricultural and/or urban areas, with resistance levels in agriculture being far higher than urban areas due to greater ongoing use of OP and CM pesticides. In every case of resistance inH. azteca, we identified a glycine‐to‐serine amino acid substitution (G119S) that has been shown to confer OP and CM resistance in mosquitoes and has been associated with resistance in other insects. We found that the G119S mutation was always present in a heterozygous state.Further, we provide tentative evidence of anace‐1 gene duplication inH. aztecathat may play a role in chlorpyrifos resistance in some populations. The detection of a genetically based, adaptive OP and CM resistance in some of the same populations ofH. aztecapreviously shown to harbor a genetically based adaptive pyrethroid resistance indicates that these nontarget amphipod populations have become resistant to many of the insecticides now in common use. The terrestrial application of pesticides has provided strong selective pressures to drive evolution in a nontarget, aquatic species.

     
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ( , Antibiotics)
    Antibiotic resistance is a growing concern that has prompted a renewed focus on drug discovery, stewardship, and evolutionary studies of the patterns and processes that underlie this phenomenon. A resistant strain’s competitive fitness relative to its sensitive counterparts in the absence of drug can impact its spread and persistence in both clinical and community settings. In a prior study, we examined the fitness of tetracycline-resistant clones that evolved from five different Escherichia coli genotypes, which had diverged during a long-term evolution experiment. In this study, we build on that work to examine whether ampicillin-resistant mutants are also less fit in the absence of the drug than their sensitive parents, and whether the cost of resistance is constant or variable among independently derived lines. Like the tetracycline-resistant lines, the ampicillin-resistant mutants were often less fit than their sensitive parents, with significant variation in the fitness costs among the mutants. This variation was not associated with the level of resistance conferred by the mutations, nor did it vary across the different parental backgrounds. In our earlier study, some of the variation in fitness costs associated with tetracycline resistance was explained by the effects of different mutations affecting the same cellular pathway and even the same gene. In contrast, the variance among the ampicillin-resistant mutants was associated with different sets of target genes. About half of the resistant clones suffered large fitness deficits, and their mutations impacted major outer-membrane proteins or subunits of RNA polymerases. The other mutants experienced little or no fitness costs and with, one exception, they had mutations affecting other genes and functions. Our findings underscore the importance of comparative studies on the evolution of antibiotic resistance, and they highlight the nuanced processes that shape these phenotypes. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ( , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

    Antibiotic resistance is a growing health concern. Efforts to control resistance would benefit from an improved ability to forecast when and how it will evolve. Epistatic interactions between mutations can promote divergent evolutionary trajectories, which complicates our ability to predict evolution. We recently showed that differences between genetic backgrounds can lead to idiosyncratic responses in the evolvability of phenotypic resistance, even among closely relatedEscherichia colistrains. In this study, we examined whether a strain's genetic background also influences the genotypic evolution of resistance. Do lineages founded by different genotypes take parallel or divergent mutational paths to achieve their evolved resistance states? We addressed this question by sequencing the complete genomes of antibiotic-resistant clones that evolved from several different genetic starting points during our earlier experiments. We first validated our statistical approach by quantifying the specificity of genomic evolution with respect to antibiotic treatment. As expected, mutations in particular genes were strongly associated with each drug. Then, we determined that replicate lines evolved from the same founding genotypes had more parallel mutations at the gene level than lines evolved from different founding genotypes, although these effects were more subtle than those showing antibiotic specificity. Taken together with our previous work, we conclude that historical contingency can alter both genotypic and phenotypic pathways to antibiotic resistance.

     
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ( , Journal of Evolutionary Biology)
    Abstract

    Host–parasite interactions may often be subject to opposing evolutionary forces, which likely influence the evolutionary trajectories of both partners. Natural selection and genetic drift are two major evolutionary forces that act in host and parasite populations. Further, population size is a significant determinant of the relative strengths of these forces. In small populations, drift may undermine the persistence of beneficial alleles, potentially impeding host adaptation to parasites. Here, we investigate two questions: (a) can selection pressure for increased resistance in small, susceptible host populations overcome the effects of drift and (b) can resistance be maintained in small host populations? To answer these questions, we experimentally evolved the hostCaenorhabditis elegansagainst its bacterial parasite,Serratia marcescens, for 13 host generations. We found that strong selection favouring increased host resistance was insufficient to counteract drift in small populations, resulting in persistently high host mortality. Additionally, in small populations of resistant hosts, we found that selection for the maintenance of resistance is not always sufficient to curb the loss of resistance. We compared these results with selection in large host populations. We found that initially resistant, large host populations were able to maintain high levels of resistance. Likewise, initially susceptible, large host populations were able to gain resistance to the parasite. These results show that strong selection pressure for survival is not always sufficient to counteract drift. In consideration ofC.elegans natural population dynamics, we suggest that drift may often impede selection in nature.

     
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email