An official website of the United States government
Abstract The rapid intensification (RI) of tropical cyclones (TC), defined here as an intensity increase of ≥ 30 kt in 24 hours, is a difficult but important forecasting problem. Operational RI forecasts have considerably improved since the late 2000s, largely thanks to better statistical models, including machine learning (ML). Most ML applications use scalars from the Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme (SHIPS) development dataset as predictors, describing the TC history, near-TC environment, and satellite presentation of the TC. More recent ML applications use convolutional neural networks (CNN), which can ingest full satellite images (or time series of images) and freely “decide” which spatiotemporal features are important for RI. However, two questions remain unanswered: (1) Does image convolution significantly improve RI skill? (2) What strategies do CNNs use for RI prediction – and can we gain new insights from these strategies? We use an ablation experiment to answer the first question and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to answer the second. Convolution leads to only a small performance gain, likely because, as revealed by XAI, the CNN’s main strategy uses image features already well described in scalar predictors used by pre-existing RI models. This work makes three additional contributions to the literature: (1) NNs with SHIPS data outperform pre-existing models in some aspects; (2) NNs provide well calibrated uncertainty quantification (UQ), while pre-existing models have no UQ; (3) the NN without SHIPS data performs surprisingly well and is fairly independent of pre-existing models, suggesting its potential value in an operational ensemble.
more »
« less
Carefully Choose the Baseline: Lessons Learned from Applying XAI Attribution Methods for Regression Tasks in Geoscience
Abstract Methods of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) are used in geoscientific applications to gain insights into the decision-making strategy of neural networks (NNs), highlighting which features in the input contribute the most to a NN prediction. Here, we discuss our “lesson learned” that the task of attributing a prediction to the input does not have a single solution. Instead, the attribution results depend greatly on the considered baseline that the XAI method utilizes—a fact that has been overlooked in the geoscientific literature. The baseline is a reference point to which the prediction is compared so that the prediction can be understood. This baseline can be chosen by the user or is set by construction in the method’s algorithm—often without the user being aware of that choice. We highlight that different baselines can lead to different insights for different science questions and, thus, should be chosen accordingly. To illustrate the impact of the baseline, we use a large ensemble of historical and future climate simulations forced with the shared socioeconomic pathway 3-7.0 (SSP3-7.0) scenario and train a fully connected NN to predict the ensemble- and global-mean temperature (i.e., the forced global warming signal) given an annual temperature map from an individual ensemble member. We then use various XAI methods and different baselines to attribute the network predictions to the input. We show that attributions differ substantially when considering different baselines, because they correspond to answering different science questions. We conclude by discussing important implications and considerations about the use of baselines in XAI research. Significance StatementIn recent years, methods of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) have found great application in geoscientific applications, because they can be used to attribute the predictions of neural networks (NNs) to the input and interpret them physically. Here, we highlight that the attributions—and the physical interpretation—depend greatly on the choice of the baseline—a fact that has been overlooked in the geoscientific literature. We illustrate this dependence for a specific climate task, in which a NN is trained to predict the ensemble- and global-mean temperature (i.e., the forced global warming signal) given an annual temperature map from an individual ensemble member. We show that attributions differ substantially when considering different baselines, because they correspond to answering different science questions.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1934668
- PAR ID:
- 10390036
- Publisher / Repository:
- American Meteorological Society
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems
- Volume:
- 2
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2769-7525
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have recently attracted great attention in geoscience due to their ability to capture non-linear system behavior and extract predictive spatiotemporal patterns. Given their black-box nature however, and the importance of prediction explainability, methods of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) are gaining popularity as a means to explain the CNN decision-making strategy. Here, we establish an intercomparison of some of the most popular XAI methods and investigate their fidelity in explaining CNN decisions for geoscientific applications. Our goal is to raise awareness of the theoretical limitations of these methods and gain insight into the relative strengths and weaknesses to help guide best practices. The considered XAI methods are first applied to an idealized attribution benchmark, where the ground truth of explanation of the network is known a priori , to help objectively assess their performance. Secondly, we apply XAI to a climate-related prediction setting, namely to explain a CNN that is trained to predict the number of atmospheric rivers in daily snapshots of climate simulations. Our results highlight several important issues of XAI methods (e.g., gradient shattering, inability to distinguish the sign of attribution, ignorance to zero input) that have previously been overlooked in our field and, if not considered cautiously, may lead to a distorted picture of the CNN decision-making strategy. We envision that our analysis will motivate further investigation into XAI fidelity and will help towards a cautious implementation of XAI in geoscience, which can lead to further exploitation of CNNs and deep learning for prediction problems.more » « less
-
Abstract Artificial neural networks are increasingly used for geophysical modeling to extract complex nonlinear patterns from geospatial data. However, it is difficult to understand how networks make predictions, limiting trust in the model, debugging capacity, and physical insights. EXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques expose how models make predictions, but XAI results may be influenced by correlated features. Geospatial data typically exhibit substantial autocorrelation. With correlated input features, learning methods can produce many networks that achieve very similar performance (e.g., arising from different initializations). Since the networks capture different relationships, their attributions can vary. Correlated features may also cause inaccurate attributions because XAI methods typically evaluate isolated features, whereas networks learn multifeature patterns. Few studies have quantitatively analyzed the influence of correlated features on XAI attributions. We use a benchmark framework of synthetic data with increasingly strong correlation, for which the ground truth attribution is known. For each dataset, we train multiple networks and compare XAI-derived attributions to the ground truth. We show that correlation may dramatically increase the variance of the derived attributions, and investigate the cause of the high variance: is it because different trained networks learn highly different functions or because XAI methods become less faithful in the presence of correlation? Finally, we show XAI applied to superpixels, instead of single grid cells, substantially decreases attribution variance. Our study is the first to quantify the effects of strong correlation on XAI, to investigate the reasons that underlie these effects, and to offer a promising way to address them.more » « less
-
Pham, Tien; Solomon, Latasha; Hohil, Myron E. (Ed.)Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is the capability of explaining the reasoning behind the choices made by the machine learning (ML) algorithm which can help understand and maintain the transparency of the decision-making capability of the ML algorithm. Humans make thousands of decisions every day in their lives. Every decision an individual makes, they can explain the reasons behind why they made the choices that they made. Nonetheless, it is not the same in the case of ML and AI systems. Furthermore, XAI was not wideley researched until suddenly the topic was brought forward and has been one of the most relevant topics in AI for trustworthy and transparent outcomes. XAI tries to provide maximum transparency to a ML algorithm by answering questions about how models effectively came up with the output. ML models with XAI will have the ability to explain the rationale behind the results, understand the weaknesses and strengths the learning models, and be able to see how the models will behave in the future. In this paper, we investigate XAI for algorithmic trustworthiness and transparency. We evaluate XAI using some example use cases and by using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) library and visualizing the effect of features individually and cumulatively in the prediction process.more » « less
-
Yortsos, Yannis (Ed.)Abstract Transfer learning (TL), which enables neural networks (NNs) to generalize out-of-distribution via targeted re-training, is becoming a powerful tool in scientific machine learning (ML) applications such as weather/climate prediction and turbulence modeling. Effective TL requires knowing (1) how to re-train NNs? and (2) what physics are learned during TL? Here, we present novel analyses and a framework addressing (1)–(2) for a broad range of multi-scale, nonlinear, dynamical systems. Our approach combines spectral (e.g. Fourier) analyses of such systems with spectral analyses of convolutional NNs, revealing physical connections between the systems and what the NN learns (a combination of low-, high-, band-pass filters and Gabor filters). Integrating these analyses, we introduce a general framework that identifies the best re-training procedure for a given problem based on physics and NN theory. As test case, we explain the physics of TL in subgrid-scale modeling of several setups of 2D turbulence. Furthermore, these analyses show that in these cases, the shallowest convolution layers are the best to re-train, which is consistent with our physics-guided framework but is against the common wisdom guiding TL in the ML literature. Our work provides a new avenue for optimal and explainable TL, and a step toward fully explainable NNs, for wide-ranging applications in science and engineering, such as climate change modeling.more » « less
