An official website of the United States government
In modern workplaces, the well-being and productivity of employees are increasingly recognized as essential for organizational success. This study explores the impact of lighting interventions—specifically, Correlated Color Temperature (CCT) and illumination intensity—on stress and cognitive function restoration among office workers. A between-subjects experimental design involving 100 participants assessed the effects of various lighting conditions on stress responses and cognitive performance after exposure to stress-inducing and cognitive fatigue tasks. Five experimental conditions were studied: 100 lux & 7000 K, 100 lux & 3000 K, 1000 lux & 7000 K, 1000 lux & 3000 K, and a baseline condition of 500 lux at 3700 K. Results indicated that lighting conditions significantly influence both physiological stress markers (such as skin conductance level and heart rate) and cognitive performance. Specifically, warm, and dimmed lighting (3000 K, 100 lux) effectively reduced stress markers and perceived stress levels, aligning with theories suggesting the calming effects of warmer white light tones. Conversely, cooler lighting (7000 K) was associated with enhanced cognitive performance and reduced cognitive fatigue, potentially due to its similarity to natural daylight, stimulating an alert state conducive to mental tasks. These findings suggest that lighting interventions offer a non-intrusive strategy to improve well-being and productivity in office environments, particularly addressing acute symptoms.
more »
« less
Subjective Impression of an Office with Biophilic Design and Blue Lighting: A Pilot Study
This paper investigates and compares people’s subjective impression of an office with a biophilic design and blue lighting. Existing studies have examined their influence on perception separately, but how they compare is unclear. Additionally, only a few studies have used an office setting as a case study. To address this research gap, this study collected people’s ratings and rankings of four simulated interior scenes of a private office using an online survey. The scenes include blue lighting, a biophilic design with daylight and view, a biophilic design with indoor plants, and a non-biophilic baseline with conventional white lighting. A total of 284 complete responses were collected and analyzed using a mixed-effect model. It was found that the two biophilic designs improved people’s perception of the office compared to the base case. The biophilic design with access to daylight and view outperformed the space with indoor plants in all the examined perceptual categories, specifically how the office space was perceived by participants as brighter, more comfortable, and spacious. On the contrary, the space with blue lighting decreased people’s ratings in most perceptual attributes in comparison to the baseline. The negative influence was notably significant in how lively, comfortable, bright, and appealing the space was perceived as being by participants. Subjects’ preference rankings of the four simulated office spaces showed a similar pattern.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1640818
- PAR ID:
- 10393472
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Buildings
- Volume:
- 13
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2075-5309
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 42
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Illusory correlation (IC) is a cognitive bias that appears when decisions are based on false perception of patterns from limited data and can prevent subjects from detecting present correlations. It appears in design or psychology studies as a secondary bias, but has not been studied in-depth in engineering design. This research examines the presence of IC during concept evaluation of the engineering design process and how current engineering design education may mitigate the appearance of IC. To examine IC, different products at four different sketch quality levels and render quality levels, from quick hand drawing to shaded product render, were presented to participants through a survey-based data collection instrument. The four sketch and/or render quality levels simulate the variety of presented drawings when a design engineer is evaluating colleagues’ concepts during group work. Participants, 70 undergraduate (novice) and 21 graduate (advanced) engineering students at a major southeast US institution, were asked to rank these products based on a series of function-based and preference-based attributes. The collected data were analyzed to see if sketch and/or render quality impacted participants’ ability to gage functionality of the presented products. Results indicated no statistically significant linear correlation between better rankings of products and the sketch and/or render quality level of the provided depictions for function-based questions; however, a non-linear relationship was present for preference-based questions where participants gave higher rankings to products drawn at intermediate quality levels. No statistically significant differences were found in the strength of correlations between rankings and sketch and/or render quality levels in the comparison of novice and advanced student designers, but advanced student designers’ perception of product functionality was more strongly correlated to pre-determined baseline answers based on user ratings of the selected products. This may indicate less vulnerability to IC bias with more design engineering education due to a stronger intuition for and understanding of product functionality based on visual inspection.more » « less
-
The perception of distance is a complex process that often involves sensory information beyond that of just vision. In this work, we investigated if depth perception based on auditory information can be calibrated, a process by which perceptual accuracy of depth judgments can be improved by providing feedback and then performing corrective actions. We further investigated if perceptual learning through carryover effects of calibration occurs in different levels of a virtual environment’s visibility based on different levels of virtual lighting. Users performed an auditory depth judgment task over several trials in which they walked where they perceived an aural sound to be, yielding absolute estimates of perceived distance. This task was performed in three sequential phases: pretest, calibration, posttest. Feedback on the perceptual accuracy of distance estimates was only provided in the calibration phase, allowing to study the calibration of auditory depth perception. We employed a 2 (Visibility of virtual environment) ×3 (Phase) ×5 (Target Distance) multi-factorial design, manipulating the phase and target distance as within-subjects factors, and the visibility of the virtual environment as a between-subjects factor. Our results revealed that users generally tend to underestimate aurally perceived distances in VR similar to the distance compression effects that commonly occur in visual distance perception in VR. We found that auditory depth estimates, obtained using an absolute measure, can be calibrated to become more accurate through feedback and corrective action. In terms of environment visibility, we find that environments visible enough to reveal their extent may contain visual information that users attune to in scaling aurally perceived depth.more » « less
-
Algorithmic decision-making using rankings— prevalent in areas from hiring and bail to university admissions— raises concerns of potential bias. In this paper, we explore the alignment between people’s perceptions of fairness and two popular fairness metrics designed for rankings. In a crowdsourced experiment with 480 participants, people rated the perceived fairness of a hypothetical scholarship distribution scenario. Results suggest a strong inclination towards relying on explicit score values. There is also evidence of people’s preference for one fairness metric, NDKL, over the other metric, ARP. Qualitative results paint a more complex picture: some participants endorse meritocratic award schemes and express concerns about fairness metrics being used to modify rankings; while other participants acknowledge socio-economic factors in score-based rankings as justification for adjusting rankings. In summary, we find that operationalizing algorithmic fairness in practice is a balancing act between mitigating harms towards marginalized groups and societal conventions of leveraging traditional performance scores such as grades in decision-making contexts.more » « less
-
Spatial perception of our hand is closely linked to our ability to move the hand accurately. We might therefore expect that reach planning would take into account any changes in perceived hand position; in other words, that perception and action relating to the hand should depend on a common sensorimotor map. However, there is evidence to suggest that changes in perceived hand position affect a body representation that functions separately from the body representation used to control movement. Here, we examined target-directed reaching before and after participants either did (Mismatch group) or did not (Veridical group) experience a cue conflict known to elicit recalibration in perceived hand position. For the reaching task, participants grasped a robotic manipulandum that positioned their unseen hand for each trial. Participants then briskly moved the handle straight ahead to a visual target, receiving no performance feedback. For the perceptual calibration task, participants estimated the locations of visual, proprioceptive, or combined cues about their unseen hand. The Mismatch group experienced a gradual 70-mm forward mismatch between visual and proprioceptive cues, resulting in forward proprioceptive recalibration. Participants made significantly shorter reaches after this manipulation, consistent with feeling their hand to be further forward than it was, but reaching performance returned to baseline levels after only 10 reaches. The Veridical group, after exposure to veridically aligned visual and proprioceptive cues about the hand, showed no change in reach distance. These results suggest that perceptual recalibration affects the same sensorimotor map that is used to plan target-directed reaches. NEW & NOTEWORTHY If perceived hand position changes, we might assume this affects the sensorimotor map and, in turn, reaches made with that hand. However, there is evidence for separate body representations involved in perception versus action. After a cross-sensory conflict that results in proprioceptive recalibration in the forward direction, participants made shorter reaches as predicted, but only briefly. This suggests perceptual recalibration does affect the sensorimotor map used to plan reaches, but the interaction may be short-lived.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010042
