The performance of computational methods and software to identify differentially expressed features in single‐cell RNA‐sequencing (scRNA‐seq) has been shown to be influenced by several factors, including the choice of the normalization method used and the choice of the experimental platform (or library preparation protocol) to profile gene expression in individual cells. Currently, it is up to the practitioner to choose the most appropriate differential expression (DE) method out of over 100 DE tools available to date, each relying on their own assumptions to model scRNA‐seq expression features. To model the technological variability in cross‐platform scRNA‐seq data, here we propose to use Tweedie generalized linear models that can flexibly capture a large dynamic range of observed scRNA‐seq expression profiles across experimental platforms induced by platform‐ and gene‐specific statistical properties such as heavy tails, sparsity, and gene expression distributions. We also propose a zero‐inflated Tweedie model that allows zero probability mass to exceed a traditional Tweedie distribution to model zero‐inflated scRNA‐seq data with excessive zero counts. Using both synthetic and published plate‐ and droplet‐based scRNA‐seq datasets, we perform a systematic benchmark evaluation of more than 10 representative DE methods and demonstrate that our method (Tweedieverse) outperforms the state‐of‐the‐art DE approaches across experimental platforms in terms of statistical power and false discovery rate control. Our open‐source software (R/Bioconductor package) is available at
The ability to profile transcriptomes and characterize global gene expression changes has been greatly enabled by the development of RNA sequencing technologies (RNA-seq). However, the process of generating sequencing-compatible cDNA libraries from RNA samples can be time-consuming and expensive, especially for bacterial mRNAs which lack poly(A)-tails that are often used to streamline this process for eukaryotic samples. Compared to the increasing throughput and decreasing cost of sequencing, library preparation has had limited advances. Here, we describe bacterial-multiplexed-seq (BaM-seq), an approach that enables simple barcoding of many bacterial RNA samples that decreases the time and cost of library preparation. We also present targeted-bacterial-multiplexed-seq (TBaM-seq) that allows for differential expression analysis of specific gene panels with over 100-fold enrichment in read coverage. In addition, we introduce the concept of transcriptome redistribution based on TBaM-seq that dramatically reduces the required sequencing depth while still allowing for quantification of both highly and lowly abundant transcripts. These methods accurately measure gene expression changes with high technical reproducibility and agreement with gold standard, lower throughput approaches. Together, use of these library preparation protocols allows for fast, affordable generation of sequencing libraries.
more » « less- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10400187
- Publisher / Repository:
- Oxford University Press
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2631-9268
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract https://github.com/himelmallick/Tweedieverse . -
more » « less
Abstract Molecular ecologists seek to genotype hundreds to thousands of loci from hundreds to thousands of individuals at minimal cost per sample. Current methods, such as restriction‐site‐associated
DNA sequencing (RAD seq) and sequence capture, are constrained by costs associated with inefficient use of sequencing data and sample preparation. Here, we introduceRAD cap, an approach that combines the major benefits ofRAD seq (low cost with specific start positions) with those of sequence capture (repeatable sequencing of specific loci) to significantly increase efficiency and reduce costs relative to current approaches.RAD cap uses a new version of dual‐digestRAD seq (3RAD ) to identify candidateSNP loci for capture bait design and subsequently uses custom sequence capture baits to consistently enrich candidateSNP loci across many individuals. We combined this approach with a new library preparation method for identifying and removingPCR duplicates from 3RAD libraries, which allows researchers to processRAD seq data using traditional pipelines, and we tested theRAD cap method by genotyping sets of 96–384Wisteria plants. Our results demonstrate that ourRAD cap method: (i) methodologically reduces (to <5%) and allows computational removal ofPCR duplicate reads from data, (ii) achieves 80–90% reads on target in 11 of 12 enrichments, (iii) returns consistent coverage (≥4×) across >90% of individuals at up to 99.8% of the targeted loci, (iv) produces consistently high occupancy matrices of genotypes across hundreds of individuals and (v) costs significantly less than current approaches. -
One important characteristic of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data is its high sparsity, where the gene-cell count data matrix contains high proportion of zeros. The sparsity has motivated widespread discussions on dropouts and missing data, as well as imputation algorithms of scRNA-seq analysis. Here, we aim to investigate whether there exist genes that are more prone to be under-detected in scRNA-seq, and if yes, what commonalities those genes may share. From public data sources, we gathered paired bulk RNA-seq and scRNA-seq data from 53 human samples, which were generated in diverse biological contexts. We derived pseudo-bulk gene expression by averaging the scRNA-seq data across cells. Comparisons of the paired bulk and pseudo-bulk gene expression profiles revealed that there indeed exists a collection of genes that are frequently under-detected in scRNA-seq compared to bulk RNA-seq. This result was robust to randomization when unpaired bulk and pseudo-bulk gene expression profiles were compared. We performed motif search to the last 350 bp of the identified genes, and observed an enrichment of poly(T) motif. The poly(T) motif toward the tails of those genes may be able to form hairpin structures with the poly(A) tails of their mRNA transcripts, making it difficult for their mRNA transcripts to be captured during scRNA-seq library preparation, which is a mechanistic conjecture of why certain genes may be more prone to be under-detected in scRNA-seq.more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract Summary With the advancements of high-throughput single-cell RNA-sequencing protocols, there has been a rapid increase in the tools available to perform an array of analyses on the gene expression data that results from such studies. For example, there exist methods for pseudo-time series analysis, differential cell usage, cell-type detection RNA-velocity in single cells, etc. Most analysis pipelines validate their results using known marker genes (which are not widely available for all types of analysis) and by using simulated data from gene-count-level simulators. Typically, the impact of using different read-alignment or unique molecular identifier (UMI) deduplication methods has not been widely explored. Assessments based on simulation tend to start at the level of assuming a simulated count matrix, ignoring the effect that different approaches for resolving UMI counts from the raw read data may produce. Here, we present minnow, a comprehensive sequence-level droplet-based single-cell RNA-sequencing (dscRNA-seq) experiment simulation framework. Minnow accounts for important sequence-level characteristics of experimental scRNA-seq datasets and models effects such as polymerase chain reaction amplification, cellular barcodes (CB) and UMI selection and sequence fragmentation and sequencing. It also closely matches the gene-level ambiguity characteristics that are observed in real scRNA-seq experiments. Using minnow, we explore the performance of some common processing pipelines to produce gene-by-cell count matrices from droplet-bases scRNA-seq data, demonstrate the effect that realistic levels of gene-level sequence ambiguity can have on accurate quantification and show a typical use-case of minnow in assessing the output generated by different quantification pipelines on the simulated experiment.
Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
-
Abstract Background Quantification of gene expression from RNA-seq data is a prerequisite for transcriptome analysis such as differential gene expression analysis and gene co-expression network construction. Individual RNA-seq experiments are larger and combining multiple experiments from sequence repositories can result in datasets with thousands of samples. Processing hundreds to thousands of RNA-seq data can result in challenges related to data management, access to sufficient computational resources, navigation of high-performance computing (HPC) systems, installation of required software dependencies, and reproducibility. Processing of larger and deeper RNA-seq experiments will become more common as sequencing technology matures. Results GEMmaker, is a nf-core compliant, Nextflow workflow, that quantifies gene expression from small to massive RNA-seq datasets. GEMmaker ensures results are highly reproducible through the use of versioned containerized software that can be executed on a single workstation, institutional compute cluster, Kubernetes platform or the cloud. GEMmaker supports popular alignment and quantification tools providing results in raw and normalized formats. GEMmaker is unique in that it can scale to process thousands of local or remote stored samples without exceeding available data storage. Conclusions Workflows that quantify gene expression are not new, and many already address issues of portability, reusability, and scale in terms of access to CPUs. GEMmaker provides these benefits and adds the ability to scale despite low data storage infrastructure. This allows users to process hundreds to thousands of RNA-seq samples even when data storage resources are limited. GEMmaker is freely available and fully documented with step-by-step setup and execution instructions.more » « less
