<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Trophic provisioning and parental trade-offs lead to successful reproductive performance in corals after a bleaching event</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher></publisher>
				<date>12/01/2022</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10401546</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.1038/s41598-022-21998-4</idno>
					<title level='j'>Scientific Reports</title>
<idno>2045-2322</idno>
<biblScope unit="volume">12</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>					

					<author>Lisa J. Rodrigues</author><author>Jacqueline L. Padilla-Gamiño</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[Abstract                          Warming ocean temperatures are severely compromising the health and resilience of coral reefs worldwide. Coral bleaching can affect coral physiology and the energy available for corals to reproduce. Mechanisms associated with reproductive allocation in corals are poorly understood, especially after a bleaching event occurs. Using isotopic labeling techniques, we traced the acquisition and allocation of carbon from adults to gametes by autotrophy and heterotrophy in previously bleached and non-bleached              Montipora capitata              and              Porites compressa              corals. Experiments revealed that both species: (1) relied only on autotrophy to allocate carbon to gametes, while heterotrophy was less relied upon as a carbon source; (2) experienced a trade-off with less carbon available for adult tissues when provisioning gametes, especially when previously bleached; and (3) used different strategies for allocating carbon to gametes. Over time,              M. capitata              allocated 10% more carbon to gametes despite bleaching by limiting the allocation of carbon to adult tissues, with 50–80% less carbon allocated to bleached compared to non-bleached colonies. Over the same time period,              P. compressa              maintained carbon allocation to adult tissues, before allocating carbon to gametes. Our study highlights the importance of autotrophy for carbon allocation from adult corals to gametes, and species-specific differences in carbon allocation depending on bleaching susceptibility.]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><p>Carbon stored as lipids in eggs <ref type="bibr">31</ref> is particularly important for species with lecithotrophic development, including corals, as larval nutrition is limited to resources contained within the egg <ref type="bibr">32</ref> . To date, it is not known whether the carbon that is translocated to coral eggs is the result of autotrophic or heterotrophic carbon acquisition by the parent. Baumann et al. <ref type="bibr">33</ref> hypothesized that heterotrophic carbon may be disproportionately allocated to lipids in released coral eggs, independent of bleaching status of the parent. In the coral Pocillopora verrucosa, heterotrophy seemed to negatively impact gamete development <ref type="bibr">34</ref> , while there was a positive relationship in the gorgonian Paramuricea clavata <ref type="bibr">35</ref> . To date, only one prior study has traced photosynthate products from adult coral colonies of Stylophora pistillata to their released planulae (i.e., larvae) <ref type="bibr">36</ref> . In this brooding species with fertilization and larval development occurring within parental polyps, there was greater transfer of autotrophic carbon from parents to planula than to eggs <ref type="bibr">36</ref> , suggesting that the species may prioritize transfer of fixed carbon to offspring during embryogenesis. It is unknown how carbon is provisioned by corals that are broadcast spawners, where fertilization occurs in the water column after release of eggs/sperm from polyps. Furthermore, it is unknown how carbon is provisioned by parent to offspring following environmental stress for any coral reproductive strategy.</p><p>To better understand the link between the type of carbon acquisition by parents (autotrophic vs. heterotrophic) and subsequent allocation to offspring, we performed a series of experiments to follow carbon from parents to eggs in two coral species. We compared provisioning of <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C in colonies that had previously bleached and recovered with those colonies that did not bleach during thermal stress (Fig. <ref type="figure">1</ref>). Specifically, we: (1) traced carbon allocation in adult corals after a bleaching event; (2) traced parental provisioning of carbon in adult corals to gametes; (3) assessed provisioning to gametes via autotrophic and heterotrophic pathways; and (4) focused on broadcast spawners with hermaphroditic (Montipora capitata) and gonochoric (Porites compressa) reproductive strategies. </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Methods</head><p>Coral species. We examined carbon acquisition and allocation in two Hawaiian reef-building corals, Montipora capitata and Porites compressa. Both coral species are dominant in K&#257;ne' ohe Bay (O'ahu, Hawai'i, USA), where the study was performed. Montipora capitata is a simultaneous hermaphrodite with buoyant gamete (i.e., egg-sperm) bundles and surface water fertilization <ref type="bibr">37,</ref><ref type="bibr">38</ref> . Porites compressa is a gonochoric spawner with neutrally buoyant eggs and fertilization within the water column <ref type="bibr">39</ref> . To assess parental provisioning to eggs in both species, we focused analyses on female colonies of P. compressa in this study. Both of these species spawn during the summer, although P. compressa has a more extended (summer through fall) and less synchronized spawning period than M. capitata <ref type="bibr">40</ref> . Montipora capitata has higher settlement rates than P. compressa but early settlers have higher mortality and slow growth compared to P. compressa <ref type="bibr">40</ref> .</p><p>Experimental design. Our study was designed to follow the timing of both thermal stress (a naturally occurring bleaching event <ref type="bibr">41</ref> ) and the coral reproductive cycle (development of gametes and release during the spawning season <ref type="bibr">42</ref> ). Our study site, reef K4 (21&#176;26&#8242; 36.6&#8243; N, 157&#176; 48&#8242; 21.6&#8243; W), is a fringing reef located in the central part of K&#257;ne' ohe Bay where water has a residence time of 10-20 days <ref type="bibr">43</ref> . Flow is wave driven and influenced by wind driven long-shore currents originating in the southern portion of the bay <ref type="bibr">[43]</ref><ref type="bibr">[44]</ref><ref type="bibr">[45]</ref> . Between 1 August and 25 September 2015 there was a bleaching event in K&#257;ne' ohe Bay when seawater temperatures ranged from 28.4 to 29.8 &#176;C41 . During this period, corals from multiple reefs throughout K&#257;ne' ohe Bay were impacted <ref type="bibr">41</ref> , including those at reef K4. Throughout K&#257;ne' ohe Bay, 16.6% &#177; 4.7 of Montipora capitata and 19.7% &#177; 0.7 of Porites compressa colonies bleached in 2015, with most colonies visibly recovered within 3-4 months of the event <ref type="bibr">46</ref> .</p><p>In October 2015 when eggs started to develop <ref type="bibr">42</ref> and approximately one month after peak seawater temperatures <ref type="bibr">41</ref> , we tagged visibly bleached and non-bleached colonies of both species at ~ 2 m depth at reef K4. Every 2-3 months colonies were monitored, and tags were cleaned to ensure the identification of the colonies for future collection prior to the spawning season when gametes were fully developed (Fig. <ref type="figure">1</ref>). Both M. capitata and P. compressa have long gametogenic cycles that can last 9-10 months <ref type="bibr">42</ref> and coincide with the recovery of other physiological parameters of adult corals after a bleaching event <ref type="bibr">26</ref> .</p><p>On 27 May 2016 (approximately eight months after the bleaching event), we collected fragments from four previously bleached and four previously non-bleached tagged colonies each of M. capitata and P. compressa. Colony fragments were approximately 10 cm 3 each in size and contained at least eight fingers; similarly sized fragments were used from both species. At the time of collection, all colonies of both species appeared visibly non-bleached (Fig. <ref type="figure">1</ref>); this was confirmed with no significant difference in chlorophyll a (&#181;g/g) concentrations (method described in <ref type="bibr">26</ref> ) between previously bleached and non-bleached adult colonies (Student's t-test for M. capitata: df = 3, F = 0.88, p = 0.4477; P. compressa: df = 7, F = 1.51, p = 0.2656). Coral fragments were transported to outdoor flow-through seawater tanks at the Hawai'i Institute of Marine Biology; the seawater was unfiltered, temperature ranged from 25.2 to 26.4 &#176;C, and light availability ranged from 584 to 1249 &#181;mol photons/m 2 /s. Each fragment was further divided into four nubbins for genetic replication across the following four treatments: autotrophy pulse-chase labeled; autotrophy unlabeled; heterotrophy pulse-chase labeled; and heterotrophy unlabeled.</p><p>On 1 June 2016 we began the autotrophy pulse-chase experiment. Autotrophy pulse-chase labeled and autotrophy unlabeled fragments were isolated in 2 L chambers filled with 0.2 &#181;m-filtered and sterilized seawater to remove all plankton and limit heterotrophy of the nubbins. Chambers were placed in flow-through seawater tanks to maintain a constant ambient temperature through the experiment. One hour after sunrise, the pulse phase of the autotrophy experiment began with the introduction of 0.117 M of 98 at.% 13 C NaHCO 3 was added to each treatment chamber for a final concentration of dissolved inorganic carbon of approximately 26 &#181;mol/l <ref type="bibr">25</ref> . The same volume of unlabeled 0.2 &#181;m-filtered and sterilized seawater was added to each control chamber. After 9 h, the isolation chambers were flushed with unlabeled 0.2 &#181;m-filtered seawater to begin the chase phase. On day 1 (2 June 2016) and day 7 (8 June 2016) of the chase phase, we collected small pieces from each labeled and unlabeled colony for isotopic analyses. Water was exchanged within each chamber every 6 h during the chase period.</p><p>To prepare <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C-labelled rotifers for the heterotrophy pulse-chase experiment, we obtained cultures of native Hawaiian phytoplankton (Nannochloropsis oculata) and rotifers (Brachionus plicatilis). Cultures were maintained in 0.2 &#181;m-filtered and sterilized seawater. The phytoplankton culture was grown with 0.117 M of 98 at.% 13 C NaHCO 3 <ref type="bibr">25</ref> for at least two days and fed to the rotifer culture three times daily for three days prior to their use in the heterotrophy experiment. Resulting &#948; <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C values for labeled and unlabeled phytoplankton were 75.82&#8240; and -15.87&#8240;, respectively; &#948; <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C values of labeled and unlabeled rotifers were 19.32&#8240; and -16.98&#8240;, respectively. On 2 June 2016, heterotrophy pulse-chase labeled and heterotrophy unlabeled fragments were isolated in 2 L chambers filled with 0.2 &#181;m-filtered and sterilized seawater to remove any non-labeled plankton from the chambers. One hour after sunset, the pulse phase of the heterotrophy experiment began with the introduction of 150 ml of <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C-labelled rotifers at a concentration of 2-4 rotifers per ml to each treatment chamber <ref type="bibr">25</ref> . The same volume and concentration of unlabeled rotifers was added to each control chamber. Coral polyps were active and displayed extended tentacles. After eight hours, the isolation chambers were flushed with unlabeled unfiltered seawater to begin the chase phase. On day 1 (3 June 2016) and day 7 (9 June 2016) of the chase phase, we collected small pieces from each labeled and unlabeled colony for isotopic analyses. Coral samples from both pulse-chase experiments were collected and immediately frozen at -80 &#176;C before being transported to Villanova University for further processing.</p><p>Coral tissue was removed from the skeleton using deionized water and an airbrush. Symbiont cells and host tissue were separated with a tissue grinder and centrifugation <ref type="bibr">47</ref> . Separated cells and tissue were pipetted into different tin capsules (EA Consumables, LLC, Marlton, NJ), dried at 60 &#176;C for at least 24 h. We visually checked all samples of symbiont cells and host tissues under a microscope prior to ensure that no skeletal pieces were in the capsules. Then, all capsules were folded into small, uniform pellets in preparation for isotopic analyses.</p><p>On the evenings of 5 and 6 June 2016, some M. capitata colonies released gamete bundles during a natural spawning event (1-2 days after the new moon). These dates coincided with days 3-4 of the chase phase for colonies in the heterotrophic experiment and days 4-5 of the chase phase for colonies in the autotrophic experiment (Fig. <ref type="figure">1</ref>). Gamete bundles were collected from the surface of isolation chambers using pipettes for M. capitata <ref type="bibr">18</ref> . We were unable to collect spawned eggs from P. compressa. This species has been sporadically observed to spawn during and after the full moon <ref type="bibr">38,</ref><ref type="bibr">48</ref> and the timing for gamete release is not as predictable as for M. capitata. To assess the isotopic signature of in situ developing eggs from both species, we preserved an additional fragment from each colony in 1.85% formaldehyde on day 7 of the chase. These fragments were decalcified using Cal-Ex II Fixative/Decalcifier, rinsed in 70% ethanol and developing eggs were dissected from the coral tissue. There was no significant difference in the isotopic values of gamete bundles released during the spawning event and eggs dissected from the same colony (paired t-test: df = 8, t = 0.25, p = 0.8090). Whether released or dissected, gametes bundles/eggs were pipetted into tin capsules, dried at 60 &#176;C for at least 24 h, and folded into small, uniform pellets in preparation for isotopic analyses.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Stable isotope analyses.</head><p>All tin capsules were combusted in an Elementar Pyrocube and the resulting CO 2 gas was analyzed with an Elementar Isoprime100 isotope ratio mass spectrometer at The Academy of Natural Sciences at Drexel University. &#948; <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C values are reported relative to Vienna Peedee Belemnite Limestone Standard (vPDB) (&#948; 13 C = per mil deviation of the ratio of stable carbon 13 C: <ref type="bibr">12</ref> C relative to vPDB). Samples were analyzed in duplicate. Standards, B2150 (EA Consumables, LLC, Marlton, NJ), internal elk tissue, DORM (fish muscle) and bird feather standards had a precision of &#177; 0.14&#8240; for &#948; <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C.</p><p>Statistical analyses. Statistically significant differences in &#948; <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C values were determined separately for each species and trophic pulse-chase experiment with mixed effects modeling (Supplementary Table <ref type="table">1</ref>). These compared the effects of prior bleaching status (bleached, non-bleached), pulse period treatment ( 13 C-labeled, unlabeled), and tissue type (symbiont, host, eggs/bundles), and the repeated effect of time during the chase period (day 1, day 7). Each model included a random effect of genotype and tissue type (symbiont cells, host tissue and egg/bundle) was nested within prior bleaching status. The random and repeated effects were compared with covariance parameter estimates and the fit statistic, -2res log likelihood. Post-hoc Tukey-Kramer tests determined the factors that were significantly different from each other within significant interactions of the main model effects (Supplementary Tables <ref type="table">2</ref><ref type="table">3</ref><ref type="table">4</ref><ref type="table">5</ref>). p &#8804; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We calculated percent enrichment values to compare average labeled values to their respective controls for each pulse-chase experiment and species (Supplementary Table <ref type="table">6</ref>). All statistical analyses were generated using SAS statistical software Version 9.4 of the SAS System for Windows.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Results and discussion</head><p>Pathways for autotrophic acquisition of carbon. Our results provide the first direct evidence of resource allocation of carbon from adult coral colonies to their eggs (Fig. <ref type="figure">2</ref>). Both species relied on autotrophy for carbon allocation to eggs. By day 1 of the chase for Montipora capitata, there was significant incorporation of <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C from autotrophy in symbiont cells (Fig. <ref type="figure">2a</ref>) and host tissue (Fig. <ref type="figure">2b</ref>) in labeled compared to control corals of both bleached and non-bleached adult colonies. Similarly, by days 4-5 there was significant <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C enrichment in labeled compared to control gamete bundles released from both bleached and non-bleached adult colonies (Fig. <ref type="figure">2c</ref>). In M. capitata, the location of <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C allocation and its retention time within adults during the chase phase was different based on prior bleaching status. In bleached colonies, significantly more <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C was allocated to symbiont cells than host tissue, and significantly more <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C was allocated to host tissue than gamete bundles beginning on day 1 of the chase (Fig. <ref type="figure">2a-c</ref>; Supplementary Table <ref type="table">2</ref>). By day 7, <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C was depleted (i.e., lower &#948; 13 C) in both symbiont cells and host tissue of bleached corals with no significant difference between labeled and control colonies (Fig. <ref type="figure">2a</ref>, <ref type="figure">b</ref>). However, eggs of bleached colonies continued to be a significant storage site (i.e., higher &#948; 13 C) for <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C allocation at day 7 (Fig. <ref type="figure">2c</ref>). In contrast, non-bleached colonies retained <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C-label in symbiont cells, host tissue, and eggs through day 7 of the chase (Fig. <ref type="figure">2a-c</ref>). Despite this, there was significantly more 13 C translocated to developing eggs of bleached than non-bleached colonies by day 7 (Fig. <ref type="figure">2c</ref>; Supplementary Table <ref type="table">2</ref>). Altogether these patterns indicate significant prioritization on gamete development over adult tissue maintenance in M. capitata when carbon is autotrophically-acquired, particularly when bleaching has occurred.</p><p>For both bleached and non-bleached Porites compressa, patterns of autotrophic allocation of <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C were similar to that of bleached M. capitata. In P. compressa on day 1 of the chase, there was significantly greater incorporation of <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C in symbiont cells (Fig. <ref type="figure">2d</ref>) and host tissue (Fig. <ref type="figure">2e</ref>) in labeled compared to control corals of both bleached and non-bleached adult colonies (Supplementary Table <ref type="table">3</ref>). There was more <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C allocated to the symbiont than the host regardless of prior bleaching status. By day 7, <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C-label was significantly depleted in symbiont cells and host tissue of both bleached and non-bleached adult colonies (Fig. <ref type="figure">2d</ref>, e; Supplementary Table <ref type="table">3</ref>). Although we were unable to assess the gametes of P. compressa before day 7 of the chase, eggs dissected from both bleached and non-bleached colonies were significantly more enriched in <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C in labeled compared to control corals (Fig. <ref type="figure">2f</ref>). In contrast to M. capitata, there was greater allocation of <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C to eggs of non-bleached than bleached colonies in P. compressa (Fig. <ref type="figure">2f</ref>; Supplementary Table <ref type="table">3</ref>). Adults that did not bleach were able to allocate more autotrophicallyacquired carbon to their eggs than those that did bleach.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Pathways for heterotrophic acquisition of carbon. While prior biochemical studies of adult coral</head><p>colonies hypothesized that heterotrophy would be critical to egg development in M. capitata especially following bleaching and less so in P. compressa <ref type="bibr">26,</ref><ref type="bibr">28</ref> , we find that neither species relied heavily on heterotrophy. Approximately 8 months after a natural bleaching event, resource allocation of both species to their eggs relied predomi- <ref type="url">www.nature.com/scientificreports/</ref> nantly on autotrophically-acquired carbon (Fig. <ref type="figure">2</ref>). In M. capitata, there was little acquisition of heterotrophic 13 C by symbiont cells (Fig. <ref type="figure">2g</ref>) and host tissue (Fig. <ref type="figure">2h</ref>) of adult colonies and developing eggs or released gamete bundles (Fig. <ref type="figure">2i</ref>), except by symbiont cells from bleached colonies at day 7 (Fig. <ref type="figure">2g</ref>; Supplementary Table <ref type="table">4</ref>). Although M. capitata has been shown to feed more heterotrophically while bleached and in the early months of recovery from bleaching <ref type="bibr">47,</ref><ref type="bibr">49,</ref><ref type="bibr">50</ref> , it is more reliant on autotrophy than other conspecifics when non-bleached <ref type="bibr">28</ref> . More recently, &#948; <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C analyses indicated a limited influence of heterotrophy on M. capitata during post-bleaching recovery <ref type="bibr">51</ref> . Our data indicate that carbon from heterotrophy was not incorporated by gametes in M. capitata, suggesting that this source is less critical to gametogenesis than previously hypothesized.</p><p>In contrast, heterotrophic carbon was incorporated into the developing eggs of some non-bleached colonies of P. compressa, although not statistically significant as a group (Fig. <ref type="figure">2l</ref>). Similarly, P. compressa adults showed little to no acquisition of heterotrophic <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C, except by day 1 when there was significant enrichment of <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C by symbiont cells from non-bleached colonies (Fig. <ref type="figure">2j</ref>; Supplementary Table <ref type="table">5</ref>). This indicates that if feeding occurred during the experiment, any associated carbon was metabolized quickly (within hours) of the chase. By day 7, the developing eggs of non-bleached labeled P. compressa were on average 40% more enriched with <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C than non-bleached control colonies (Fig. <ref type="figure">2l</ref>). Like autotrophic acquisition, there was greater allocation of <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C to eggs from non-bleached to bleached colonies of P. compressa following heterotrophy (Fig. <ref type="figure">2l</ref>; Supplementary Table <ref type="table">5</ref>). Accumulation of heterotrophic carbon in P. compressa eggs of some colonies at day 7 (Fig. <ref type="figure">2l</ref>), while not statistically significant, may have been translocated via the host tissue in less than 24 h. Transfer of carbon is known to occur within 24 h between cellular organelles of adult tissues <ref type="bibr">52</ref> and among tissue layers of larvae <ref type="bibr">53</ref> , therefore  , <ref type="figure">e</ref>, <ref type="figure">h</ref>, <ref type="figure">k)</ref>, and <ref type="figure">eggs (c</ref>, <ref type="figure">f</ref>, <ref type="figure">i</ref>, <ref type="figure">l</ref>) for each species. All stable carbon isotopic values (&#948; 13 C) are shown; with control colonies (DI <ref type="bibr">12</ref> C or 12 C-rotifers) in white symbols; labeled colonies (DI <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C or <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C-rotifers) in colored symbionts. Green, blue, or pink symbols indicate statistically significant differences compared to control colonies; and labeled colonies in grey symbols indicate no significant difference compared to control colonies. Complete statistical analyses can be found in Supplementary Tables <ref type="figure">1</ref><ref type="figure">2</ref><ref type="figure">3</ref><ref type="figure">4</ref><ref type="figure">5</ref>.</p><p>translocation from parent to gametes may also occur under similar time periods. Heterotrophic acquisition of carbon to eggs may occur in P. compressa and deserves further investigation.</p><p>Low enrichment values indicate limited evidence of carbon allocation by heterotrophy. This may be due to loss of carbon via respiration of the coral holobiont <ref type="bibr">25</ref> and/or mucus production <ref type="bibr">54</ref> and subsequent uptake of carbon by microbes in coral mucus <ref type="bibr">55</ref> . The timing of the experiment with respect to spawning periods of each species, may have further impacted carbon uptake by heterotrophy. For M. capitata, spawning occurred in the midst of the experiment, while for P. compressa spawning would have occurred approximately two weeks later <ref type="bibr">38,</ref><ref type="bibr">48</ref> . It is important to note that some colonies of P. compressa contained eggs with heterotrophically-acquired carbon, suggesting that coral feeding can contribute to egg development in this species. To date we know little about how or if coral feeding behavior changes as eggs grow and occupy more space in the gastrovascular cavity or how feeding is impacted by the process of bundle formation and preparation for gamete release. Further research is needed to better understand the role of heterotrophy in coral reproduction <ref type="bibr">34,</ref><ref type="bibr">35</ref> .</p><p>Parental provisioning of carbon. Parental provisioning in corals with different reproductive strategies (brooders vs spawners) may occur at different rates and stages during gametogenesis and/or embryogenesis. In our study we found that broadcast spawners transferred carbon mostly autotrophically to eggs within days before their release. Similarly, gametes of M. capitata <ref type="bibr">56</ref> and P. compressa <ref type="bibr">48</ref> both receive symbionts from their parents prior to their release (i.e., vertical transmission), not from the environment (i.e., horizontal transmission). In the brooding coral, Stylophora pistillata translocation of carbon preferentially occurred at the planula (post-fertilization) stage <ref type="bibr">36</ref> , while planulae of S. pistillata are known to receive symbionts both by vertical and horizontal transmission <ref type="bibr">57</ref> . Regardless of trophic source, carbon allocation from parents to gametes may coincide with vertical transmission of symbionts to more effectively supply offspring with resources required immediately upon release.</p><p>Pulse-chase experiments conducted on planulae support this hypothesis. For example, planulae of Pocillopora damicornis relied on carbon supplied by the parent for at least 24 h after being released, then shifted to carbon acquired autotrophically from their own symbionts at 48 h <ref type="bibr">53</ref> . Progressively older larvae relied more on autotrophy for their carbon supply than on parental reserves. Pocillopora damicornis planulae &lt; 5 days old received 16-27% of fixed carbon from their symbionts <ref type="bibr">58</ref> , while nearly one-month old planulae acquired approximately 70-85% of carbon from symbionts <ref type="bibr">59,</ref><ref type="bibr">60</ref> . Similarly-aged Montipora digitata larvae acquired up to 90% of fixed carbon from photosynthate of their symbionts <ref type="bibr">60</ref> . Although it is not known when or by what trophic pathway parental provisioning occurs in P. damicornis (a brooding species with vertical transmission) or M. digitata (a spawning species with vertical transmission), parental sources of carbon are relied upon immediately once offspring reach the water column and for several subsequent days. The initial lack of photosynthate production by symbionts in gametes/larvae of these species may prevent oxidative damage during the first 24 h of release as they drift near the surface and may be at greater risk of heat stress <ref type="bibr">61</ref> . Thus, further emphasizing the importance of parental provisioning of carbon to offspring.</p><p>Parental trade-offs. Trade-off theory indicates that reproduction will generally interfere with maintenance and/or growth of the parent, with metabolic trade-offs becoming more complex when symbiosis is involved <ref type="bibr">62</ref> . For example, in damaged or dislodged coral colonies, metabolic costs associated with regeneration resulted in decreased reproduction <ref type="bibr">63,</ref><ref type="bibr">64</ref> . In our study, we found that coral parents translocated carbon resources to their gametes prior to release, but this occurred at a detriment to carbon storage in adult tissue. Adult colonies of both species experienced a physiological trade-off when supplying their eggs with carbon, especially among those colonies that had previously bleached. Gametes enriched in <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C coincided with depletion of <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C in both symbiont cells and host tissue, evidence of a resource trade-off for parents. Loss of carbon from the parent tissue due to reproduction is expected and has been calculated as part of carbon budgets <ref type="bibr">36,</ref><ref type="bibr">65</ref> , or implicated from field observations and energy reserve analyses <ref type="bibr">15</ref> . This is the first direct measure of that metabolic trade-off as carbon depletion in parental tissues.</p><p>In our study, we cannot assess how much <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C, if any, was lost by adult tissues through respiration. However, no change in <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C between day 1 and 7 in non-bleached symbiont cells (Fig. <ref type="figure">2a</ref>) or host tissue (Fig. <ref type="figure">2b</ref>) of M. capitata (Supplementary Table <ref type="table">2</ref>), suggests that respiration of newly acquired carbon was minimal. A trade-off in carbon allocation occurred within just 7 days of acquisition in our study, suggesting that maintenance of symbiont cells and host tissue are being impacted by carbon requirements for developing gametes over relatively short time periods. In the case of M. capitata this trade-off occurred for carbon acquired autotrophically by previously bleached colonies only, while for P. compressa autotrophically-acquired carbon was translocated from adults to developing eggs by both bleached and non-bleached colonies. Reallocation of carbon away from adults and for egg development occurred in both species.</p><p>Other studies have shown long-term trade-offs for adult colonies that reproduce. For example, reproducing colonies of P. damicornis had half the annual linear extension rate of non-reproducing colonies <ref type="bibr">65</ref> . Long-term trade-offs have also been associated with reproduction following a bleaching event. In Orbicella annularis (previously Montastraea annularis), gametogenesis occurred after bleaching in colonies that had visibly recovered, while colonies that remained visibly bleached consumed their own structural material for maintenance and did not reproduce <ref type="bibr">15,</ref><ref type="bibr">17</ref> . In Acropora spp. reproductive output was proportional to bleaching susceptibility, but growth rates were independent of bleaching severity <ref type="bibr">66</ref> . While bleaching is known to reduce calcification in some Hawaiian species <ref type="bibr">9,</ref><ref type="bibr">47</ref> , reproduction continued despite bleaching <ref type="bibr">18</ref> . To date, long-term trade-offs associated with growth and reproduction after a bleaching event remain unclear <ref type="bibr">67</ref> and warrant further investigation.</p><p>Trophic dynamics and coral metabolism. Heterotrophy in bleached corals is hypothesized to be indicative of a colony under stress and/or a resilience mechanism to survive bleaching <ref type="bibr">50,</ref><ref type="bibr">68</ref> . Adult reliance on heterotrophic acquisition of <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C was lower in our study (i.e., eight months after natural bleaching) compared to eleven months after experimental bleaching for the same species <ref type="bibr">50</ref> . Differences in adult response were probably due to differences in temperature severity as the experimental bleaching was ~ 3 &#176;C warmer than the 2015 natural bleaching event of our study <ref type="bibr">25,</ref><ref type="bibr">69</ref> . In addition, shading, cloud cover, rain events, and flow may all moderate conditions on a reef during some natural bleaching events, allowing affected corals to recover faster <ref type="bibr">69</ref> than with more controlled temperature treatments during experimental bleaching. Our findings suggest that the duration of heterotrophic reliance post-bleaching depends on the severity of the stress.</p><p>While heterotrophic acquisition of carbon seems indicative of bleaching severity in some coral species <ref type="bibr">50,</ref><ref type="bibr">70</ref> , autotrophic acquisition and allocation may be more indicative of the physiological stress on the adult colony. In previously bleached colonies of M. capitata and all colonies of P. compressa, autotrophically-acquired <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C was catabolized, not stored, as it decreased from day 1 to day 7 of the chase (Fig. <ref type="figure">2a-f</ref>). Conversely, newly acquired carbon was stored and maintained in colonies of M. capitata that did not bleach in the 2015 event. Our results show that even if bleached M. capitata colonies recovered (i.e., acquired symbionts and developed gametes), there was still a fundamental difference in carbon requirements between bleached and non-bleached colonies eight months later.</p><p>Species-specific differences in how carbon is allocated following bleaching may reflect differences in the timing of their gametogenic cycles and spawning periods. In Hawai'i, the timing between the bleaching season (Sept-Oct) and the spawning season (May-June) is at least seven months <ref type="bibr">41,</ref><ref type="bibr">71</ref> . Recovery of bleached colonies and the development of gametes can occur within this timeframe. In M. capitata, egg development starts in Aug-Sept, takes approximately eight to ten months and spawning occurs during May-Aug, two to four days after the new moon <ref type="bibr">18,</ref><ref type="bibr">42</ref> . The length of the gametogenic cycle in P. compressa is unknown, but sporadic observations indicate that this species releases gametes during and after the full moon in summer months <ref type="bibr">38,</ref><ref type="bibr">48</ref> . In our experiments, M. capitata had already spawned on days 3-5 of the chase, while P. compressa may have spawned ~ 11-12 days after the conclusion of our study. Significant translocation of <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C from adults to in situ eggs may indicate that P. compressa was allocating resources to eggs and preparing for spawning (Fig. <ref type="figure">2f</ref>, <ref type="figure">l</ref>). Although we were unable to observe spawning in P. compressa, our data clearly show that this species has the capacity to produce gametes after a bleaching event and that carbon was supplied to eggs in both previously bleached and non-bleached colonies. For both species, long-term recovery of bleached colonies occurred in parallel to the development of gametes <ref type="bibr">42</ref> . As thermal stress events become more frequent, intense and longer in duration, the window to recover and develop gametes may shorten, impacting reproductive life history strategies.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Strategies for reproduction following coral bleaching. A comparison of previously bleached and</head><p>non-bleached colonies provides evidence of the physiological impacts that occur eight months after a natural bleaching event in adults and developing gametes. Previously bleached M. capitata depleted carbon storage within symbiont cells (by 80%) and host tissue (by 50%) compared to non-bleached colonies (Fig. <ref type="figure">2a</ref>, <ref type="figure">b</ref>). Yet, translocating carbon to eggs was an energetic priority for both bleached and non-bleached colonies (Fig. <ref type="figure">2c</ref>). Carbon translocation to eggs occurred at the detriment of bleached adult colonies, while carbon storage was maintained in non-bleached adult colonies. Furthermore, previously bleached colonies supplied more <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C to eggs (by 10%) at day 7 than non-bleached colonies (Fig. <ref type="figure">2c</ref>, Supplementary Table <ref type="table">2</ref>). These findings show that the M. capitata prioritized gamete development and that the amount of energy supplied by the parent for this physiological process is not limited by prior bleaching. Previously bleached colonies were able to meet the energy demand for eggs by depleting stored carbon reserves in adults. These results support those by Cox <ref type="bibr">18</ref> and provide a mechanism for continued gametogenesis in M. capitata despite bleaching. Additionally, similar amounts of carbon were translocated to developing eggs despite differences in bleaching susceptibility (Supplementary Table <ref type="table">2</ref>). This supports previous findings that identified low phenotypic and biochemical variability of eggs in M. capitata from parents with distinct morphology, physiology, and exposure to environmental stress <ref type="bibr">72</ref> .</p><p>In P. compressa, gametogenesis continued after bleaching and developing eggs were provisioned with newly acquired carbon in previously bleached and non-bleached colonies. Although <ref type="bibr">13</ref> C was incorporated autotrophically to eggs in P. compressa (Fig. <ref type="figure">2f</ref>, <ref type="figure">l</ref>), there was no difference in incorporation of carbon by symbiont cells or host tissue in bleached compared to non-bleached colonies via either trophic pathway (Supplementary Tables <ref type="table">3</ref>, <ref type="table">5</ref>). This suggests that P. compressa adults had physiologically recovered from the bleaching event <ref type="bibr">26</ref> . Yet, we observed at least one remaining impact of the bleaching event in their developing eggs, as 45-80% less carbon was translocated to eggs of previously bleached than non-bleached colonies (Fig. <ref type="figure">2f</ref>, <ref type="figure">l</ref>). Porites compressa may only supply carbon to eggs when there is surplus available and after the adult has recovered. While bleached P. compressa produced eggs and may spawn after a bleaching event, non-bleached colonies likely spawn earlier or produce more, or larger eggs compared to bleached colonies.</p><p>Our study highlights two different strategies of coral parental provisioning with important consequences for the survival of adults and offspring in the context of future and repeated bleaching events. By increasing carbon allocated to eggs, bleached M. capitata prioritized gametogenesis at the expense of the adult colony. Higher investment in reproduction may help compensate for the low survival of early recruits of this species <ref type="bibr">40</ref> . For P. compressa, there was no difference in the allocation of carbon to the host tissues of bleached and non-bleached adult colonies. However, less carbon was transferred to eggs of bleached colonies, and this may lead to smaller and/ or fewer eggs in bleached colonies. Since P. compressa has less evolutionary pressure to produce large amounts of gametes <ref type="bibr">40</ref> , this strategy for carbon allocation may maintain reproductive potential after a bleaching event.</p></div><note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_0"><p>Scientific Reports | (2022) 12:18702 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21998-4</p></note>
			<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_1"><p>Scientific Reports | (2022) 12:18702 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21998-4</p></note>
			<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_2"><p>Vol.:(0123456789) Scientific Reports | (2022) 12:18702 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21998-4</p></note>
			<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_3"><p>Vol:.(1234567890) Scientific Reports | (2022) 12:18702 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21998-4</p></note>
		</body>
		</text>
</TEI>
