Whether and to what extent kindergarten children's executive functions (EF) constitute promising targets of early intervention is currently unclear. This study examined whether kindergarten children's EF predicted their second‐grade academic achievement and behavior. This was done using (a) a longitudinal and nationally representative sample (N = 8,920, Mage = 97.6 months), (b) multiple measures of EF, academic achievement, and behavior, and (c) extensive statistical control including for domain‐specific and domain‐general lagged dependent variables. All three measures of EF—working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control—positively and significantly predicted reading, mathematics, and science achievement. In addition, inhibitory control negatively predicted both externalizing and internalizing problem behaviors. Children's EF constitute promising targets of experimentally evaluated interventions for increasing academic and behavioral functioning. 
                        more » 
                        « less   
                    
                            
                            Framing Executive Function as a Construct and its Relation to Academic Achievement
                        
                    
    
            The goal of this work is to provide a framework for understanding the relationship between executive function (EF) to reading and other academic achievements to promote future work in this area. After briefly reviewing extant theoretical and empirical support about what is known in this area, we then more deeply evaluate the construct of EF itself. This is necessary because EF means any number of things to any number of individuals, scientists included. Review of several pertinent conceptualizations of EF, including our own, reveals agreement that EF is domain general (although the meaning of domain generality is varied); additional commonalities include a focus on control/management and goal direction. However, there is less agreement on whether EF is singular or plural, or whether EF is one or more “thing(s)” versus process(es). These alternatives are discussed with a focus on the implications for understanding the role of EF for important functional outcomes. 
        more » 
        « less   
        
    
                            - Award ID(s):
- 1760760
- PAR ID:
- 10416737
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Mind, Brain, and Education
- ISSN:
- 1751-2271
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
- 
            
- 
            Abstract Throughout history, recreational mathematics has always played a prominent role in advancing research. Following in this tradition, in this paper we extend some recent work with crazy sequential representations of numbers− equations made of sequences of one through nine (or nine through one) that evaluate to a number. All previous work on this type of puzzle has focused only on base ten numbers and whether a solution existed. We generalize this concept and examine how this extends to arbitrary bases, the ranges of possible numbers, the combinatorial challenge of finding the numbers, efficient algorithms, and some interesting patterns across any base. For the analysis, we focus on bases three through ten. Further, we outline several interesting mathematical and algorithmic complexity problems related to this area that have yet to be considered.more » « less
- 
            The Gulf of Alaska is rimmed by a Mesozoic- Cenozoic accretionary wedge complex comprised of the Chugach and the Prince William terranes. This study focuses on understanding the history and relationship between turbidites of the Chugach and Prince William terranes in the Prince William Sound area: the Campanian-Maastrichtian Valdez Group and the Paleocene-Eocene Orca Group. Critical in understanding this system is the Contact fault system, a poorly understood collection of fault strands that has traditionally been viewed as the terrane boundary between the two (Winkler and Plafker 1975; Plafker et al. 1977; Tysdal and Case 1979; Dumoulin 1988; Bol and Gibbons 1992; Bol and Roeske 1993; Arkle et al. 2013). It was thought to be an original accretionary fault that separates terranes (Plafker et al. 1977; Nokleberg et al., 1986; Dumoulin, 1988); however, more recent work has characterized it as a sequence of faults that may be related to internal deformation of the accretionary complex (Bol and Gibbons, 1992; Bol and Roeske, 1993). The main goal of this study is to determine whether the Contact fault functions as a terrane boundary across Prince William Sound by presenting new detrital zircon U-Pb ages from either side of the fault system (Fig. 1). First, we specifically focus on understanding the age relationships between the Valdez Group and the Orca Group on either side of the Jack Bay fault and the Landlock fault in Valdez Arm, northeastern Prince William Sound (Fig. 2). Second, we focus on strands of the Contact fault system in three other locations: Unakwik Inlet, Kings Bay, and Seward (Fig. 3). This second goal of this study is to determine the nature of the Landlock block, an area currently defined by the convergence of the Jack Bay and Landlock faults (Fig. 2). Early maps portrayed the Landlock block as Valdez Group (Moffit, 1954; Winkler and Plafker, 1975), but the current location of the Contact fault in Jack Bay includes the block as part of the Orca Group (Dumoulin, 1998; Bol and Roeske, 1993). Therefore, an important question is the affinity of the rocks of the Landlock block, whether they are Orca Group or Valdez Group.more » « less
- 
            Executive function (EF) is wrought with confusion around how it is conceptualized and measured. The roots of EF trace back to unusual neurological case studies beginning in the 19th century and war injuries in the early 20th century. Since then, EF has taken on quite a number of meanings and operationalizations. This presentation will compare a variety of current perspectives on EF, review key issues relevant to its understanding, and offer (at least one) path forward, to allow for greater coherence in this complex field.more » « less
- 
            Abstract How do children form beliefs about the infinity of space, time, and number? We asked whether children held similar beliefs about infinity across domains, and whether beliefs in infinity for domains like space and time might be scaffolded upon numerical knowledge (e.g., knowledge successors within the count list). To test these questions, 112 U.S. children (aged 4;0–7;11) completed an interview regarding their beliefs about infinite space, time, and number. We also measured their knowledge of counting, and other factors that might impact performance on linguistic assessments of infinity belief (e.g., working memory, ability to respond to hypothetical questions). We found that beliefs about infinity were very high across all three domains, suggesting that infinity beliefs may arise early in development for space, time, and number. Second, we found that—across all three domains—children were more likely to believe that it is always possible to add a unit than to believe that the domain is endless. Finally, we found that understanding the rules underlying counting predicted children’s belief that it is always possible to add 1 to any number, but did not predict any of the other elements of infinity belief.more » « less
 An official website of the United States government
An official website of the United States government 
				
			 
					 
					
 
                                    