An official website of the United States government
Abstract Histones, ubiquitous in eukaryotes as DNA-packing proteins, find their evolutionary origins in archaea. Unlike the characterized histone proteins of a number of methanogenic and themophilic archaea, previous research indicated that HpyA, the sole histone encoded in the model halophile Halobacterium salinarum, is not involved in DNA packaging. Instead, it was found to have widespread but subtle effects on gene expression and to maintain wild type cell morphology. However, the precise function of halophilic histone-like proteins remain unclear. Here we use quantitative phenotyping, genetics, and functional genomics to investigate HpyA function. These experiments revealed that HpyA is important for growth and rod-shaped morphology in reduced salinity. HpyA preferentially binds DNA at discrete genomic sites under low salt to regulate expression of ion uptake, particularly iron. HpyA also globally but indirectly activates other ion uptake and nucleotide biosynthesis pathways in a salt-dependent manner. Taken together, these results demonstrate an alternative function for an archaeal histone-like protein as a transcriptional regulator, with its function tuned to the physiological stressors of the hypersaline environment.
more »
« less
The Hypersaline Archaeal Histones HpyA and HstA Are DNA Binding Proteins That Defy Categorization According to Commonly Used Functional Criteria
ABSTRACT Histone proteins are found across diverse lineages of Archaea , many of which package DNA and form chromatin. However, previous research has led to the hypothesis that the histone-like proteins of high-salt-adapted archaea, or halophiles, function differently. The sole histone protein encoded by the model halophilic species Halobacterium salinarum , HpyA, is nonessential and expressed at levels too low to enable genome-wide DNA packaging. Instead, HpyA mediates the transcriptional response to salt stress. Here we compare the features of genome-wide binding of HpyA to those of HstA, the sole histone of another model halophile, Haloferax volcanii . hstA , like hpyA , is a nonessential gene. To better understand HpyA and HstA functions, protein-DNA binding data (chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing [ChIP-seq]) of these halophilic histones are compared to publicly available ChIP-seq data from DNA binding proteins across all domains of life, including transcription factors (TFs), nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs), and histones. These analyses demonstrate that HpyA and HstA bind the genome infrequently in discrete regions, which is similar to TFs but unlike NAPs, which bind a much larger genomic fraction. However, unlike TFs that typically bind in intergenic regions, HpyA and HstA binding sites are located in both coding and intergenic regions. The genome-wide dinucleotide periodicity known to facilitate histone binding was undetectable in the genomes of both species. Instead, TF-like and histone-like binding sequence preferences were detected for HstA and HpyA, respectively. Taken together, these data suggest that halophilic archaeal histones are unlikely to facilitate genome-wide chromatin formation and that their function defies categorization as a TF, NAP, or histone. IMPORTANCE Most cells in eukaryotic species—from yeast to humans—possess histone proteins that pack and unpack DNA in response to environmental cues. These essential proteins regulate genes necessary for important cellular processes, including development and stress protection. Although the histone fold domain originated in the domain of life Archaea , the function of archaeal histone-like proteins is not well understood relative to those of eukaryotes. We recently discovered that, unlike histones of eukaryotes, histones in hypersaline-adapted archaeal species do not package DNA and can act as transcription factors (TFs) to regulate stress response gene expression. However, the function of histones across species of hypersaline-adapted archaea still remains unclear. Here, we compare hypersaline histone function to a variety of DNA binding proteins across the tree of life, revealing histone-like behavior in some respects and specific transcriptional regulatory function in others.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1651117
- PAR ID:
- 10420920
- Editor(s):
- Komeili, Arash
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- mBio
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 2150-7511
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Garner, Ethan (Ed.)For microbial cells, an appropriate response to changing environmental conditions is critical for viability. Transcription regulatory proteins, or transcription factors (TF) sense environmental signals to change gene expression. However, it remains unclear how TFs and their corresponding gene regulatory networks are selected over evolutionary time scales. The function of TFs and how they evolve are particularly understudied in archaeal organisms. Here, we identified, characterized, and compared the function of the RosR TF across three related hypersaline-adapted archaeal model species. RosR was previously characterized as a global regulator of gene expression during oxidative stress in the species Halobacterium salinarum ( hsRosR). Here, we use functional genomics and quantitative phenotyping to demonstrate that, despite strong sequence conservation of RosR across species, its function diverges substantially. Surprisingly, RosR in Haloferax volcanii ( hvRosR) and Haloferax mediterranei ( hmRosR) regulates genes whose products function in motility and the membrane, leading to significant defects in motility when RosR is deleted. Given weak conservation and degeneration in cis-regulatory sequences recognized by the RosR TF across species, we hypothesize that the RosR regulatory network is readily rewired during evolution across related species of archaea.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Characterizing genome-wide binding profiles of transcription factors (TFs) is essential for understanding biological processes. Although techniques have been developed to assess binding profiles within a population of cells, determining them at a single-cell level remains elusive. Here, we report scFAN (single-cell factor analysis network), a deep learning model that predicts genome-wide TF binding profiles in individual cells. scFAN is pretrained on genome-wide bulk assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (ATAC-seq), DNA sequence, and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) data and uses single-cell ATAC-seq to predict TF binding in individual cells. We demonstrate the efficacy of scFAN by both studying sequence motifs enriched within predicted binding peaks and using predicted TFs for discovering cell types. We develop a new metric “TF activity score” to characterize each cell and show that activity scores can reliably capture cell identities. scFAN allows us to discover and study cellular identities and heterogeneity based on chromatin accessibility profiles.more » « less
-
DNA base damage arises frequently in living cells and needs to be removed by base excision repair (BER) to prevent mutagenesis and genome instability. Both the formation and repair of base damage occur in chromatin and are conceivably affected by DNA-binding proteins such as transcription factors (TFs). However, to what extent TF binding affects base damage distribution and BER in cells is unclear. Here, we used a genome-wide damage mapping method, N -methylpurine-sequencing (NMP-seq), and characterized alkylation damage distribution and BER at TF binding sites in yeast cells treated with the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). Our data show that alkylation damage formation was mainly suppressed at the binding sites of yeast TFs ARS binding factor 1 (Abf1) and rDNA enhancer binding protein 1 (Reb1), but individual hotspots with elevated damage levels were also found. Additionally, Abf1 and Reb1 binding strongly inhibits BER in vivo and in vitro, causing slow repair both within the core motif and its adjacent DNA. Repair of ultraviolet (UV) damage by nucleotide excision repair (NER) was also inhibited by TF binding. Interestingly, TF binding inhibits a larger DNA region for NER relative to BER. The observed effects are caused by the TF–DNA interaction, because damage formation and BER can be restored by depletion of Abf1 or Reb1 protein from the nucleus. Thus, our data reveal that TF binding significantly modulates alkylation base damage formation and inhibits repair by the BER pathway. The interplay between base damage formation and BER may play an important role in affecting mutation frequency in gene regulatory regions.more » « less
-
Abstract Assessing the dynamics of chromatin features and transcription factor (TF) binding at scale remains a significant challenge in plants. Here, we present PHILO (Plant HIgh-throughput LOw input) ChIP-seq, a high-throughput ChIP-seq platform that enables the cost-effective and extensive capture of TF binding and genome-wide distributions of histone modifications. The PHILO ChIP-seq pipeline is adaptable to many plant species, requires very little starting material (1mg), and provides the option to use MNase (micrococcal nuclease) for chromatin fragmentation. By employing H3K9ac PHILO ChIP-seq on eight Arabidopsis thaliana jasmonic acid (JA) pathway mutants, with the simultaneous processing of over 100 samples, we not only recapitulated but also expanded the current understanding of the intricate interplay between the master TFs MYC2/3/4 and various chromatin regulators. Additionally, our analyses brought to light previously unknown histone acetylation patterns within the regulatory regions of MYC2 target genes in Arabidopsis, which is also conserved in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). In summary, our PHILO ChIP-seq platform demonstrates its high effectiveness in investigating TF binding and chromatin dynamics on a large scale in plants, paving the way for the cost-efficient realization of complex experimental setups.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.03449-22
