An official website of the United States government
ABSTRACT G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute one of the most prominent families of integral membrane receptor proteins that mediate most transmembrane signaling processes. Malfunction of these signal transduction processes is one of the underlying causes of many human pathologies (Parkinson's, Huntington's, heart diseases, etc), provoking that GPCRs are the largest family of druggable proteins. However, these receptors have been targeted traditionally by orthosteric ligands, which usually causes side effects due to the simultaneous targeting of homologous receptor subtypes. Allosteric modulation offers a promising alternative approach to circumvent this problematic and, thus, comprehending its details is a most important task. Here we use the Cannabinoid type‐1 receptor (CB1R) in trying to shed light on this issue, focusing on positive allosteric modulation. This is done by using the protein‐dipole Langevin‐dipole (PDLD) within the linear response approximation (LRA) framework (PDLD/S‐2000) along with our coarse‐grained (CG) model of membrane proteins to evaluate the dissociation constants (KBs) and cooperativity factors (αs) for a diverse series of CB1R positive allosteric modulators belonging to the 2‐phenylindole structural class, considering CP55940 as an agonist. The agreement with the experimental data evinces that significantly populated allosteric modulator:CB1R and allosteric modulator:CP55940:CB1R complexes have been identified and characterized successfully. Analyzing them, it has been determined that CB1R positive allosteric modulation lies in an outwards displacement of transmembrane α helix (TM) 4 extracellular end and in the regulation of the range of motion of a compound TM7 movement for binary and ternary complexes, respectively. In this respect, we achieved a better comprehension of the molecular architecture of CB1R positive allosteric site, identifying Lys1923.28and Gly1943.30as key residues regarding electrostatic interactions inside this cavity, and to rationalize (at both structural and molecular level) the exhibited stereoselectivity in relation to positive allosteric modulation activity by considered CB1R allosteric modulators. Additionally, putative/postulated allosteric binding sites have been screened successfully, identifying the real CB1R positive allosteric site, and most structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies of CB1R 2‐phenylindole allosteric modulators have been rationalized. All these findings point out towards the predictive value of the methodology used in the current work, which can be applied to other biophysical systems of interest. The results presented in this study contribute significantly to understand GPCRs allosteric modulation and, hopefully, will encourage a more thorough exploration of the topic.
more »
« less
A Statistical Journey through the Topological Determinants of the β2 Adrenergic Receptor Dynamics
Activation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is mediated by molecular switches throughout the transmembrane region of the receptor. In this work, we continued along the path of a previous computational study wherein energy transport in the β2 Adrenergic Receptor (β2-AR) was examined and allosteric switches were identified in the molecular structure through the reorganization of energy transport networks during activation. In this work, we further investigated the allosteric properties of β2-AR, using Protein Contact Networks (PCNs). In this paper, we report an extensive statistical analysis of the topological and structural properties of β2-AR along its molecular dynamics trajectory to identify the activation pattern of this molecular system. The results show a distinct character to the activation that both helps to understand the allosteric switching previously identified and confirms the relevance of the network formalism to uncover relevant functional features of protein molecules.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1854271
- PAR ID:
- 10422038
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Entropy
- Volume:
- 24
- Issue:
- 7
- ISSN:
- 1099-4300
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 998
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest group of membrane receptors for transmembrane signal transduction. Ligand-induced activation of GPCRs triggers G protein activation followed by various signaling cascades. Understanding the structural and energetic determinants of ligand binding to GPCRs and GPCRs to G proteins is crucial to the design of pharmacological treatments targeting specific conformations of these proteins to precisely control their signaling properties. In this study, we focused on interactions of a prototypical GPCR, beta-2 adrenergic receptor (β 2 AR), with its endogenous agonist, norepinephrine (NE), and the stimulatory G protein (G s ). Using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we demonstrated the stabilization of cationic NE, NE(+), binding to β 2 AR by G s protein recruitment, in line with experimental observations. We also captured the partial dissociation of the ligand from β 2 AR and the conformational interconversions of G s between closed and open conformations in the NE(+)–β 2 AR–G s ternary complex while it is still bound to the receptor. The variation of NE(+) binding poses was found to alter G s α subunit (G s α) conformational transitions. Our simulations showed that the interdomain movement and the stacking of G s α α1 and α5 helices are significant for increasing the distance between the G s α and β 2 AR, which may indicate a partial dissociation of G s α The distance increase commences when G s α is predominantly in an open state and can be triggered by the intracellular loop 3 (ICL3) of β 2 AR interacting with G s α, causing conformational changes of the α5 helix. Our results help explain molecular mechanisms of ligand and GPCR-mediated modulation of G protein activation.more » « less
-
While the COVID-19 pandemic continues to worsen, effective medicines that target the life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 are still under development. As more highly infective and dangerous variants of the coronavirus emerge, the protective power of vaccines will decrease or vanish. Thus, the development of drugs, which are free of drug resistance is direly needed. The aim of this study is to identify allosteric binding modulators from a large compound library to inhibit the binding between the Spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2). The binding of the Spike protein to hACE2 is the first step of the infection of host cells by the coronavirus. We first built a compound library containing 77 448 antiviral compounds. Molecular docking was then conducted to preliminarily screen compounds which can potently bind to the Spike protein at two allosteric binding sites. Next, molecular dynamics simulations were performed to accurately calculate the binding affinity between the spike protein and an identified compound from docking screening and to investigate whether the compound can interfere with the binding between the Spike protein and hACE2. We successfully identified two possible drug binding sites on the Spike protein and discovered a series of antiviral compounds which can weaken the interaction between the Spike protein and hACE2 receptor through conformational changes of the key Spike residues at the Spike–hACE2 binding interface induced by the binding of the ligand at the allosteric binding site. We also applied our screening protocol to another compound library which consists of 3407 compounds for which the inhibitory activities of Spike/hACE2 binding were measured. Encouragingly, in vitro data supports that the identified compounds can inhibit the Spike–ACE2 binding. Thus, we developed a promising computational protocol to discover allosteric inhibitors of the binding of the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 to the hACE2 receptor, and several promising allosteric modulators were discovered.more » « less
-
Abstract The gonadotropins follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) are key regulators of sexual development and the reproductive cycle in vertebrates. Unlike most G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), the FSHR and LHR have large extracellular domains containing multiple leucine-rich repeats, which leads to an elaborate mechanism of receptor activation via orthosteric sites that is difficult to manipulate synthetically. To bypass the orthosteric mechanism, in this study using carp as a model organism we identified allosteric sites capable of receptor activation on the transmembrane domain, which are spatially separated from the orthosteric sites. We have further generated pharmacophore hypothesis based on the structural motifs and exposed residues of these cavities. Using available online small compound libraries consisting of >70000 small molecules, we have thereon used receptor cavity-based hypothesis and other screening stages to identify potential modulators of the allosteric binding site on the carp FSHR and LHRin-silico. We then examined byin vitrotransactivation assay the effect of four candidate compounds on FSHR and LHR, as compared to the activity of native ligands. Our results reveal both specific and dual effective allosteric modulators for FSHR and LHR, demonstrating the potential of our approach for efficient pharmacophore-based screening.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Many intracellular signaling pathways are composed of molecular switches, proteins that transition between two states— on and off . Typically, signaling is initiated when an external stimulus activates its cognate receptor that, in turn, causes downstream switches to transition from off to on using one of the following mechanisms: activation, in which the transition rate from the off state to the on state increases; derepression, in which the transition rate from the on state to the off state decreases; and concerted, in which activation and derepression operate simultaneously. We use mathematical modeling to compare these signaling mechanisms in terms of their dose–response curves, response times, and abilities to process upstream fluctuations. Our analysis elucidates several operating principles for molecular switches. First, activation increases the sensitivity of the pathway, whereas derepression decreases sensitivity. Second, activation generates response times that decrease with signal strength, whereas derepression causes response times to increase with signal strength. These opposing features allow the concerted mechanism to not only show dose–response alignment, but also to decouple the response time from stimulus strength. However, these potentially beneficial properties come at the expense of increased susceptibility to upstream fluctuations. We demonstrate that these operating principles also hold when the models are extended to include additional features, such as receptor removal, kinetic proofreading, and cascades of switches. In total, we show how the architecture of molecular switches govern their response properties. We also discuss the biological implications of our findings.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.3390/e24070998
