More Like this

1. Evaluation of the ${}^{35}\mathrm{K}(p,\gamma ){}^{36}\mathrm{Ca}$ reaction rate using the ${}^{37}\mathrm{Ca}(p,d){}^{36}\mathrm{Ca}$ transfer reaction

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.055809  

   Lalanne, L.; Sorlin, O.; Assié, M.; Hammache, F.; de Séréville, N.; Koyama, S.; Suzuki, D.; Flavigny, F.; Beaumel, D.; Blumenfeld, Y.; et al (May 2021, Physical Review C)

   null (Ed.)
2. Implications of the ${}^{36}\mathrm{Ca}-{}^{36}\mathrm{S}$ and ${}^{38}\mathrm{Ca}-{}^{38}\mathrm{Ar}$ difference in mirror charge radii on the neutron matter equation of state

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.022035  

   Brown, B. A.; Minamisono, K.; Piekarewicz, J.; Hergert, H.; Garand, D.; Klose, A.; König, K.; Lantis, J. D.; Liu, Y.; Maaß, B.; et al (May 2020, Physical Review Research)
3. Optical model potentials for deuteron scattering off ${}^{24}\mathrm{Mg},$ ${}^{28}\mathrm{Si},$ ${}^{58}\mathrm{Ni},$ ${}^{90}\mathrm{Zr},$ ${}^{116}\mathrm{Sn},$ and ${}^{208}\mathrm{Pb}$ at $\approx 100 \mathrm{MeV}\text{/}\text{nucleon}$

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.044314  

   Patel, D.; Cuong, D_C; Howard, K_B; Garg, U.; Khoa, Dao_T; Akimune, H.; Berg, G_P_A; Fujiwara, M.; Harakeh, M_N; Itoh, M.; et al (October 2024, Physical Review C)
4. ${}^{28}\mathrm{Si}(p,t){}^{26}\mathrm{Si}$ data reconsidered for the astrophysical ${}^{25}\mathrm{Al}(p,\gamma ){}^{26}\mathrm{Si}$ rate

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.035804  

   Bardayan, D. W. (September 2023, Physical Review C)
5. Shell-model studies of the astrophysical $rp$ -process reactions ${}^{34}\mathrm{S}(p,\gamma ){}^{35}\mathrm{Cl}$ and ${}^{34g,m}\mathrm{Cl}(p,\gamma ){}^{35}\mathrm{Ar}$

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.025801  

   Richter, W. A.; Brown, B. A.; Longland, R.; Wrede, C.; Denissenkov, P.; Fry, C.; Herwig, F.; Kurtulgil, D.; Pignatari, M.; Reifarth, R. (August 2020, Physical Review C)