Title: CHARM: Composing Heterogeneous AcceleRators for Matrix Multiply on Versal ACAP Architecture
Dense matrix multiply (MM) serves as one of the most heavily used kernels in deep learning applications. To cope with the high computation demands of these applications, heterogeneous architectures featuring both FPGA and dedicated ASIC accelerators have emerged as promising platforms. For example, the AMD/Xilinx Versal ACAP architecture combines general-purpose CPU cores and programmable logic (PL) with AI Engine processors (AIE) optimized for AI/ML. An array of 400 AI Engine processors executing at 1 GHz can theoretically provide up to 6.4 TFLOPs performance for 32-bit floating-point (fp32) data. However, machine learning models often contain both large and small MM operations. While large MM operations can be parallelized efficiently across many cores, small MM operations typically cannot. In our investigation, we observe that executing some small MM layers from the BERT natural language processing model on a large, monolithic MM accelerator in Versal ACAP achieved less than 5% of the theoretical peak performance. Therefore, one key question arises: How can we design accelerators to fully use the abundant computation resources under limited communication bandwidth for end-to-end applications with multiple MM layers of diverse sizes?
We identify the biggest system throughput bottleneck resulting from the mismatch of massive computation resources of one monolithic accelerator and the various MM layers of small sizes in the application. To resolve this problem, we propose the CHARM framework to compose multiple diverse MM accelerator architectures working concurrently towards different layers within one application. CHARM includes analytical models which guide design space exploration to determine accelerator partitions and layer scheduling. To facilitate the system designs, CHARM automatically generates code, enabling thorough onboard design verification. We deploy the CHARM framework for four different deep learning applications, including BERT, ViT, NCF, MLP, on the AMD/Xilinx Versal ACAP VCK190 evaluation board. Our experiments show that we achieve 1.46 TFLOPs, 1.61 TFLOPs, 1.74 TFLOPs, and 2.94 TFLOPs inference throughput for BERT, ViT, NCF, MLP, respectively, which obtain 5.40x, 32.51x, 1.00x and 1.00x throughput gains compared to one monolithic accelerator. more »« less
Zhuang, Jinming; Lau, Jason; Ye, Hanchen; Yang, Zhuoping; Ji, Shixin; Lo, Jack; Denolf, Kristof; Neuendorffer, Stephen; Jones, Alex; Hu, Jingtong; et al(
, ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems)
Dense matrix multiply (MM) serves as one of the most heavily used kernels in deep learning applications. To cope with the high computation demands of these applications, heterogeneous architectures featuring both FPGA and dedicated ASIC accelerators have emerged as promising platforms. For example, the AMD/Xilinx Versal ACAP architecture combines general-purpose CPU cores and programmable logic with AI Engine processors optimized for AI/ML. An array of 400 AI Engine processors executing at 1 GHz can provide up to 6.4 TFLOPS performance for 32-bit floating-point (FP32) data. However, machine learning models often contain both large and small MM operations. While large MM operations can be parallelized efficiently across many cores, small MM operations typically cannot. We observe that executing some small MM layers from the BERT natural language processing model on a large, monolithic MM accelerator in Versal ACAP achieved less than 5% of the theoretical peak performance. Therefore, one key question arises:How can we design accelerators to fully use the abundant computation resources under limited communication bandwidth for end-to-end applications with multiple MM layers of diverse sizes?
We identify the biggest system throughput bottleneck resulting from the mismatch between massive computation resources of one monolithic accelerator and the various MM layers of small sizes in the application. To resolve this problem, we propose the CHARM framework to composemultiple diverse MM accelerator architecturesworking concurrently on different layers within one application. CHARM includes analytical models which guide design space exploration to determine accelerator partitions and layer scheduling. To facilitate system designs, CHARM automatically generates code, enabling thorough onboard design verification. We deploy the CHARM framework on four different deep learning applications in FP32, INT16, and INT8 data types, including BERT, ViT, NCF, and MLP, on the AMD/Xilinx Versal ACAP VCK190 evaluation board. Our experiments show that we achieve 1.46 TFLOPS, 1.61 TFLOPS, 1.74 TFLOPS, and 2.94 TFLOPS inference throughput for BERT, ViT, NCF, and MLP in FP32 data type, respectively, which obtain 5.29\(\times\), 32.51\(\times\), 1.00\(\times\), and 1.00\(\times\)throughput gains compared to one monolithic accelerator. CHARM achieves the maximum throughput of 1.91 TOPS, 1.18 TOPS, 4.06 TOPS, and 5.81 TOPS in the INT16 data type for the four applications. The maximum throughput achieved by CHARM in the INT8 data type is 3.65 TOPS, 1.28 TOPS, 10.19 TOPS, and 21.58 TOPS, respectively. We have open-sourced our tools, including detailed step-by-step guides to reproduce all the results presented in this paper and to enable other users to learn and leverage CHARM framework and tools in their end-to-end systems:https://github.com/arc-research-lab/CHARM.
Arbitrary-precision integer multiplication is the core kernel of many applications including scientific computing, cryptographic algorithms, etc. Existing acceleration of arbitrary-precision integer multiplication includes CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, and ASICs. To leverage the hardware intrinsics low-bit function units (32/64-bit), arbitrary-precision integer multiplication can be calculated using Karatsuba decomposition, and Schoolbook decomposition by decomposing the two large operands into several small operands, generating a set of low-bit multiplications that can be processed either in a spatial or sequential manner on the low-bit function units, e.g., CPU vector instructions, GPU CUDA cores, FPGA digital signal processing (DSP) blocks. Among these accelerators, reconfigurable computing, e.g., FPGA accelerators are promised to provide both good energy efficiency and flexibility. We implement the state-of-the-art (SOTA) FPGA accelerator and compare it with the SOTA libraries on CPUs and GPUs. Surprisingly, in terms of energy efficiency, we find that the FPGA has the lowest energy efficiency, i.e., 0.29x of the CPU and 0.17x of the GPU with the same generation fabrication. Therefore, key questions arise: Where do the energy efficiency gains of CPUs and GPUs come from? Can reconfigurable computing do better? If can, how to achieve that? We first identify that the biggest energy efficiency gains of the CPUs and GPUs come from the dedicated vector units, i.e., vector instruction units in CPUs and CUDA cores in GPUs. FPGA uses DSPs and lookup tables (LUTs) to compose the needed computation, which incurs overhead when compared to using vector units directly. New reconfigurable computing, e.g., “FPGA+vector units” is a novel and feasible solution to improve energy efficiency. In this paper, we propose to map arbitrary-precision integer multiplication onto such a “FPGA+vector units” platform, i.e., AMD/Xilinx Versal ACAP architecture, a heterogeneous reconfigurable computing platform that features 400 AI engine tensor cores (AIE) running at 1 GHz, FPGA programmable logic (PL), and a general-purpose CPU in the system fabricated with the TSMC 7nm technology. Designing on Versal ACAP incurs several challenges and we propose AIM: Arbitrary-precision Integer Multiplication on Versal ACAP to automate and optimize the design. AIM accelerator is composed of AIEs, PL, and CPU. AIM framework includes analytical models to guide design space exploration and AIM automatic code generation to facilitate the system design and on-board design verification. We deploy the AIM framework on three different applications, including large integer multiplication (LIM), RSA, and Mandelbrot, on the AMD/Xilinx Versal ACAP VCK190 evaluation board. Our experimental results show that compared to existing accelerators, AIM achieves up to 12.6x, and 2.1x energy efficiency gains over the Intel Xeon Ice Lake 6346 CPU, and NVidia A5000 GPU respectively, which brings reconfigurable computing the most energy-efficient platform among CPUs and GPUs.
As the increasing complexity of Neural Network(NN) models leads to high demands for computation, AMD introduces a heterogeneous programmable system-on-chip (SoC), i.e., Versal ACAP architectures featured with programmable logic(PL), CPUs, and dedicated AI engines (AIE) ASICs which has a theoretical throughput up to 6.4 TFLOPs for FP32, 25.6 TOPs for INT16 and 102.4 TOPs for INT8. However, the higher level of complexity makes it non-trivial to achieve the theoretical performance even for well-studied applications like matrix-matrix multiply. In this paper, we provide AutoMM, an automatic white-box framework that can systematically generate the design for MM accelerators on Versal which achieves 3.7 TFLOPs, 7.5 TOPs, and 28.2 TOPs for FP32, INT16, and INT8 data type respectively. Our designs are tested on board and achieve gains of 7.20x (FP32), 3.26x (INT16), 6.23x (INT8) energy efficiency than AMD U250, 2.32x (FP32) than Nvidia Jetson TX2, 1.06x (FP32), 1.70x (INT8) than Nvidia A100.
Zhuang, Jinming; Yang, Zhuoping; Ji, Shixin; Huang, Heng; Jones, Alex K.; Hu, Jingtong; Shi, Yiyu; Zhou, Peipei(
, ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays)
With the increase in the computation intensity of the chip, the mismatch between computation layer shapes and the available computation resource significantly limits the utilization of the chip. Driven by this observation, prior works discuss spatial accelerators or dataflow architecture to maximize the throughput. However, using spatial accelerators could potentially increase the execution latency. In this work, we first systematically investigate two execution models: (1) sequentially (temporally) launch one monolithic accelerator, and (2) spatially launch multiple accelerators. From the observations, we find that there is a latency throughput tradeoff between these two execution models, and combining these two strategies together can give us a more efficient latency throughput Pareto front. To achieve this, we propose spatial sequential architecture (SSR) and SSR design automation framework to explore both strategies together when deploying deep learning inference. We use the 7nm AMD Versal ACAP VCK190 board to implement SSR accelerators for four end-to-end transformer-based deep learning models. SSR achieves average throughput gains of 2.53x, 35.71x, and 14.20x under different batch sizes compared to the 8nm Nvidia GPU A10G, 16nm AMD FPGAs ZCU102, and U250. The average energy efficiency gains are 8.51x, 6.75x, and 21.22x, respectively. Compared with the sequential-only solution and spatial-only solution on VCK190, our spatial-sequential-hybrid solutions achieve higher throughput under the same latency requirement and lower latency under the same throughput requirement. We also use SSR analytical models to demonstrate how to use SSR to optimize solutions on other computing platforms, e.g., 14nm Intel Stratix 10 NX.
Zhang, Chengming; Geng, Tong; Guo, Anqi; Tian, Jiannan; Herbordt, Martin; Li, Ang; Tao, Dingwen(
, 2022 32nd International Conference on Field-Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL 2022))
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have drawn tremendous attention due to their unique capability to extend Machine Learning (ML) approaches to applications broadly-defined as having unstructured data, especially graphs. Compared with other Machine Learning (ML) modalities, the acceleration of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) is more challenging due to the irregularity and heterogeneity derived from graph typologies. Existing efforts, however, have focused mainly on handling graphs’ irregularity and have not studied their heterogeneity. To this end we propose H-GCN, a PL (Programmable Logic) and AIE (AI Engine) based hybrid accelerator that leverages the emerging heterogeneity of Xilinx Versal Adaptive Compute Acceleration Platforms (ACAPs) to achieve high-performance GNN inference. In particular, H-GCN partitions each graph into three subgraphs based on its inherent heterogeneity, and processes them using PL and AIE, respectively. To further improve performance, we explore the sparsity support of AIE and develop an efficient density-aware method to automatically map tiles of sparse matrix-matrix multiplication (SpMM) onto the systolic tensor array. Compared with state-of-the-art GCN accelerators, H-GCN achieves, on average, speedups of 1.1∼2.3×.
Zhuang, Jinming, Lau, Jason, Ye, Hanchen, Yang, Zhuoping, Du, Yubo, Lo, Jack, Denolf, Kristof, Neuendorffer, Stephen, Jones, Alex, Hu, Jingtong, Chen, Deming, Cong, Jason, and Zhou, Peipei.
"CHARM: Composing Heterogeneous AcceleRators for Matrix Multiply on Versal ACAP Architecture". Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays (). Country unknown/Code not available. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543622.3573210.https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10432083.
@article{osti_10432083,
place = {Country unknown/Code not available},
title = {CHARM: Composing Heterogeneous AcceleRators for Matrix Multiply on Versal ACAP Architecture},
url = {https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10432083},
DOI = {10.1145/3543622.3573210},
abstractNote = {Dense matrix multiply (MM) serves as one of the most heavily used kernels in deep learning applications. To cope with the high computation demands of these applications, heterogeneous architectures featuring both FPGA and dedicated ASIC accelerators have emerged as promising platforms. For example, the AMD/Xilinx Versal ACAP architecture combines general-purpose CPU cores and programmable logic (PL) with AI Engine processors (AIE) optimized for AI/ML. An array of 400 AI Engine processors executing at 1 GHz can theoretically provide up to 6.4 TFLOPs performance for 32-bit floating-point (fp32) data. However, machine learning models often contain both large and small MM operations. While large MM operations can be parallelized efficiently across many cores, small MM operations typically cannot. In our investigation, we observe that executing some small MM layers from the BERT natural language processing model on a large, monolithic MM accelerator in Versal ACAP achieved less than 5% of the theoretical peak performance. Therefore, one key question arises: How can we design accelerators to fully use the abundant computation resources under limited communication bandwidth for end-to-end applications with multiple MM layers of diverse sizes? We identify the biggest system throughput bottleneck resulting from the mismatch of massive computation resources of one monolithic accelerator and the various MM layers of small sizes in the application. To resolve this problem, we propose the CHARM framework to compose multiple diverse MM accelerator architectures working concurrently towards different layers within one application. CHARM includes analytical models which guide design space exploration to determine accelerator partitions and layer scheduling. To facilitate the system designs, CHARM automatically generates code, enabling thorough onboard design verification. We deploy the CHARM framework for four different deep learning applications, including BERT, ViT, NCF, MLP, on the AMD/Xilinx Versal ACAP VCK190 evaluation board. Our experiments show that we achieve 1.46 TFLOPs, 1.61 TFLOPs, 1.74 TFLOPs, and 2.94 TFLOPs inference throughput for BERT, ViT, NCF, MLP, respectively, which obtain 5.40x, 32.51x, 1.00x and 1.00x throughput gains compared to one monolithic accelerator.},
journal = {Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays},
author = {Zhuang, Jinming and Lau, Jason and Ye, Hanchen and Yang, Zhuoping and Du, Yubo and Lo, Jack and Denolf, Kristof and Neuendorffer, Stephen and Jones, Alex and Hu, Jingtong and Chen, Deming and Cong, Jason and Zhou, Peipei},
}
Warning: Leaving National Science Foundation Website
You are now leaving the National Science Foundation website to go to a non-government website.
Website:
NSF takes no responsibility for and exercises no control over the views expressed or the accuracy of
the information contained on this site. Also be aware that NSF's privacy policy does not apply to this site.
